Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Photo Technique / People Photography / October 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Light in Hair

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jack - 30 Oct 2003 21:01 GMT
Hi
When taking portraits, how important is it to have "light in the hair"?

Thanks
J C - 30 Oct 2003 22:30 GMT
>Hi
>When taking portraits, how important is it to have "light in the hair"?
>
>Thanks

Would depend on the overall effect you're looking for, don't you
think?

-- JC
McLeod - 30 Oct 2003 22:40 GMT
Depends on your subject, background, and look you're going for.  If you
photograph a dark haired subject against a dark background some sort of
separation is needed.
If you photograph someone with thinning hair it tends to make them look
balder than they are, and even sweaty or shiny headed.  Any time the
hairlight is too strong, it can wash out all detail and looks like the
photographer doesn't know what they're doing.
On the other hand, a good hairlight adds dimension to a portrait, and makes
the hair look healthy, and makes your subject look more lively.
So I guess the answer is it depends.

> Hi
> When taking portraits, how important is it to have "light in the hair"?
>
> Thanks
Randall Ainsworth - 30 Oct 2003 23:29 GMT
> When taking portraits, how important is it to have "light in the hair"?

I worked for many years without using a hairlight.  Depends on what you
want the final result to look like.
zeitgeist - 31 Oct 2003 07:48 GMT
> When taking portraits, how important is it to have "light in the hair"?

Hair is the face's frame.   It is the most easily adjustable feature we
have.  If people go to the trouble of selecting a style that suits them then
it is worth the effort to show it.

Also, it is helpful to sculpt the shape of the head, to give some separation
from the background by having a counterpoint light from the key light.  I
think a hair light is the second light a photog should use after getting a
decent mainlight that doesn't require a fill, or if you are going for
Humphrey Bogart look, a stark film noir look of a specular key and a hard
kick light (a hair light thats aimed at the side of the head positioned much
lower, usually opposite the key light)

consider the nicest outdoor light, that delicious twilight where peoples
eyes seem to sparkle and their hair glows like angels.

this reply is echoed to the z-prophoto mailing list at yahoogroups.com
Michael Quack - 31 Oct 2003 15:05 GMT
> When taking portraits, how important is it to
> have "light in the hair"?

Depends on your intentions.

Basically there is not much to add to Zeitgeists answer,
just that I always prefer a controlled soft light as
hair light, mine is a backlight bank that is 15 x 200 cm
wide with front diffusor and louvers, fired by a Hensel
130 cm longlight on a 3200 Ws powerpack.

If you use a single (compact) head, you will likely
return with a highlight hole burnt into your subjects
head.

Signature

Michael Quack <michael@photoquack.de>

http://www.photoquack.de/glamour/1.htm
http://www.photoquack.de/fashion/1.htm

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.