> Tom,
> I bet you thought rec.photo.technique was a form developed by the people for
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> > Thanks
> > Tom
Actually I wasn't trying to be ignorant. If that was how it came across it
wasn't intended. I don't mind answering any question, whether someone asks it
from ignorance or bliss. But a google search would have been more productive.
Unless Tom got offline help the question still hasn't been answered. (And I
don't know of any. I would have to search as well)
Stan
Visual Arts Photography
Tom - 22 Jul 2003 14:45 GMT
> Actually I wasn't trying to be ignorant. If that was how it came across it
> wasn't intended. I don't mind answering any question, whether someone asks it
> from ignorance or bliss. But a google search would have been more productive.
> Unless Tom got offline help the question still hasn't been answered. (And I
> don't know of any. I would have to search as well)
Fair enough Stan.
I will take another look around and hope for an answer!
;-)
Tom
Dan Gray - 27 Jul 2003 14:19 GMT
I've found a great online gallery.
http://gallery.menalto.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=index
It's really nice.
Dan