Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Photo Technique / Nature Photography / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

macro lighting

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tizzi - 29 Jan 2006 14:09 GMT
What lighting would people recommend for taking macro shots of flowers?
Should I get a ring flash or a monobloc?
Norm Dresner - 29 Jan 2006 16:30 GMT
> What lighting would people recommend for taking macro shots of flowers?
> Should I get a ring flash or a monobloc?

I shoot flowers in the field, not in  studio.  While my first choice is
natural lighting, perhaps supplemented with a reflector or diffuser, I tried
using a ring light for a while and then shifted to an off-camera hand-held
strobe.  I find that the complete freedom to control the directionality of
the lighting very important.  A diffused (Sto-Fen) on the strobe is
mandatory IMO.

   Norm
Tizzi - 30 Jan 2006 12:52 GMT
Hi Norm

Did the ring flash have any advantages over the off camera strobe?
Norm Dresner - 30 Jan 2006 15:43 GMT
> Hi Norm
>
> Did the ring flash have any advantages over the off camera strobe?

   The supposed advantage of a ring light is its shadow-less nature and
there are some pictures for which this may be desirable.  My preferences are
for more naturally looking illumination.

As far as equipment is concerned, the ring light I have is an ancient
(Soligor IIRC) not-completely-automatic unit that had to be used manually
with several test exposures before I could get decent lighting using the
D70.  I never did try it with either the 35mm film cameras or with the
2-1/4" square because of the uncertainly in the exposure.  I suppose a flash
meter would make all of that moot.

AFAIK There's only one ring light which works fully automatically with my
Nikon D70 but several units (including a Nikon) that work with my film
bodies (N90s & F100).  Since the Sigma ring light is ~$350 and the
off-camera cord and Sto-Fen diffuser totaled about $50, I didn't see much
reason to purchase the new ring light since I could get almost the same
effect by holding the flash right adjacent to the lens barrel.

   Norm
Tizzi - 30 Jan 2006 12:56 GMT
Hi Norm

Did the ring flash have any advantages over the off camera strobe?
Tizzi - 30 Jan 2006 12:58 GMT
Hi Norm

Did the ring flash have any advantages over the off camera strobe?
Thomas Hintze - 07 Feb 2006 20:03 GMT
Norm Dresner artikulierte sich am 29 Jan 2006 wie folgt:

> I shoot flowers in the field, not in  studio.  While my first choice
> is natural lighting, perhaps supplemented with a reflector or
> diffuser,

Absolutely agreed.

Without doubt using flash or not is a matter of taste. Me personally I
like natural light most. Be it overcast light giving smooth lighting or
direct sun adding reflections; which can be avoided using a diffusor (a
simple white umbrella fixed to the tripod in my case).

I only, and that is really seldom, use the ordinary flash handheld if
appropriate when I want to have reflections and sun is absent.

I never used a ring flash. But, it depends.

Greets from Germany

    Thomas
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.