Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Photo Technique / Nature Photography / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Illusions

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Daniel Rocha - 27 Jan 2006 10:47 GMT
Hello,

I would like to show you, my last update.

If all were just illusions ?

A new serie of b&w pictures, called " Illusions "

http://www.monochromatique.com/illusions/

Thanks for your visit.

Regards,
Daniel.

<> Daniel Rocha - Photographie <>
http://www.monochromatique.com
squirrel - 01 Feb 2006 22:32 GMT
there's more to life than trees
Daniel Rocha - 02 Feb 2006 23:10 GMT
> there's more to life than trees

Probably ! My wish is not to shoot trees, but
to show something else...

Regards,

http://www.monochromatique.com/illusions/

Signature

<> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <>
http://www.monochromatique.com

hey.philip - 03 Feb 2006 19:15 GMT
Daniel - these are brilliant!

I'm embarrassed to admit that I'd never thought multiple exposure much
use beyond making ghosts and pictures of you shaking your own hand.
What a terrible lack of imagination I have.

I'm always excited to find people trying to "show something else..." as
you put it. In a lot of ways I'm not convinced that there is much more
to life than trees 8) but there is so much more to the natural world
than 'gosh how beautiful'. Unfortunately not many photographers explore
this, so kudos to you.

Some of your pics give me a more substantial sense of 'biomass' - that
wonderful abundance - than would a single 'layer' of tree canopy in the
photo. I'd like to try this in colour, to really lay on the green.
Others are a little more unsettling. I can't quite get away from the
ghost thing. Do trees have ghosts? I don't know. It's an interesting
thought.

Merci!

Phil
Daniel Rocha - 05 Feb 2006 22:03 GMT
> Daniel - these are brilliant!

Ho ! Thanks Philip ! :)

> I'm embarrassed to admit that I'd never thought multiple exposure much
> use beyond making ghosts and pictures of you shaking your own hand.

oh... I use multiple exposure for the first time, and I'm happy with the
result ! :)

> What a terrible lack of imagination I have.

Me too...  It's hard.... But when an idea come into the mind, we must
use it !

> I'm always excited to find people trying to "show something else..."
> as you put it.

I try to do this. I love watching beautifull landscapes but I'm also
searching
to show the world as we can't see it.

It's hard... And need to work... hard !

> Some of your pics give me a more substantial sense of 'biomass' - that
> wonderful abundance - than would a single 'layer' of tree canopy in
> the photo.

Really. i have the same vision !

> I'd like to try this in colour, to really lay on the green.

Good idea ! I'll do it too !

> Others are a little more unsettling. I can't quite get away from the
> ghost thing. Do trees have ghosts? I don't know. It's an interesting
> thought.

Ghost is the open door of the imagination. Let the door open !

> Merci!
>
> Phil

Thanks to you Phil ! :)

Signature

<> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <>
http://www.monochromatique.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.