Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Photo Technique / Nature Photography / October 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

A good reason to Watermark All your images on the Internet

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
PWW - 14 Oct 2005 22:20 GMT
"Nebraska Weather Photos Passed Off As Hurricane Katrina

Local Photographer Says Others Take Credit For His Work"

http://www.theomahachannel.com/weather/5096316/detail.html

PWW
Signature

PWW (Paul Wayne Wilson)
Over 1,000 Photographs Online at,
http://PhotoStockFile.com

Jeroen Wenting - 16 Oct 2005 10:57 GMT
A good reason to Watermark All your images on the InternetDon't post in
HTML, it's rude.

Watermarking is useless. Unless you make it so intrusive noone wants to look
at your work anyway (and certainly won't buy it) it's not going to deter
anyone. They'll just crop or clone it out in a few minutes work.
PWW - 17 Oct 2005 13:06 GMT
> Jeroen Wenting" <jwenting at hornet dot demon dot nl> wrote:
> Watermarking is useless.

It is absolutely not useless. But good business sense. My images are my
business. And I value my images.

> Jeroen Wenting" <jwenting at hornet dot demon dot nl> wrote:
> Unless you make it so intrusive noone wants to look
> at your work anyway (and certainly won't buy it)

Hmmm, I get a lot of people looking at my images on my websites. Hmmm, I get
a lot of people to buy and license my images from my watermarked images. So
that just shot down that theory.

> Jeroen Wenting" <jwenting at hornet dot demon dot nl> wrote:
>  it's not going to deter
> anyone. They'll just crop or clone it out in a few minutes work.

To say watermarking will not "deter anyone" is just plain wrong. Most web
surfing people (who like to steal images off the internet and use them as
their own) don't have the expertise or the pro applications to Photoshop the
Watermark out of a image, let alone do a decent job of it. So right there
you have stopped many potential thieves.

Sure there are always some Photoshop knowledgeable thieves that might try
and "Clone Stamp" the watermark out. But even the Photoshop aware thieves
will have a problem getting a quality image even if they do spend a fair
amount of time on it. Plus, that is another reason not to put large size
images up online. That also makes it easier for the thieves to Photoshop the
watermark out.

I do photography for a living! Do you?
Signature

PWW (Paul Wayne Wilson)
Over 1,000 Photographs Online at,
http://PhotoStockFile.com

- 22 Oct 2005 00:05 GMT
>Watermarking is useless. Unless you make it so intrusive noone wants to look
>at your work anyway (and certainly won't buy it) it's not going to deter
>anyone. They'll just crop or clone it out in a few minutes work.

Funny, the cropping and cloning I've found done to some of my
photos didn't stop the watermark from being detected.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.