Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Photo Technique / Nature Photography / August 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

avoiding red eye when photographing owls

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bill Hilton - 12 Jul 2005 00:54 GMT
Anyone using fill flash on large owls and *not* getting red-eye?  I've
found the early AM pet roosting spot for a Great Horned Owl and two of
its large chicks but it's almost directly back-lit from the only spot I
can shoot from, so I need fill flash.  I can get them full frame with
700 mm (equiv to about 900 mm with the digital body I'm using) so
probably about 20 yards distance.

The problem is that I get red-eye when they're lQQking my direction and
they're not very interesting when looking to the side.  I'm using a
Canon 550EX flash off-camera at - 1.67 stops with a Better Beamer
extender on a 500 mm lens and have the flash mounted several inches
above the lens with a Wimberley flash bracket.  I've never had a
problem with red eye in birds before with this setup but with these
larger birds with huge eyes at this distance it's a problem.

I also tried removing the flash from the bracket and holding it to one
side about 2 ft from the body (about as far as the cord will stretch)
but still get some red-eye, so I was wondering how people avoid it.  I
have a wireless flash controller (ST-E2) so I could move the flash even
further and still fire it in E-TTL mode but it's a hassle to do this.

I know how to 'fix' red-eye in Photoshop but I prefer to get it right
in the camera, partly because I may need to send in the RAW file at
some point and partly because I just prefer getting it right in-camera.

Anyone know how far off-camera the flash needs to be for this type
situation?  I can post a few sample shots if anyone wants to see the
problem.

Bill
vixen2yall - 12 Jul 2005 04:09 GMT
> Anyone using fill flash on large owls and *not* getting red-eye?  <snip>

any way you can get the flash about 1 foot off/above the camera? if you
can move the flash higher that the lense it should eliminate the redeye
your getting. (or green eye in most animals)

cheers
kat
Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark) - 14 Jul 2005 02:17 GMT
> Anyone using fill flash on large owls and *not* getting red-eye?  I've
> found the early AM pet roosting spot for a Great Horned Owl and two of
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Bill

Hi Bill,
Boy, this newsgroup is very slow.  A couple of years ago
you would probably have gotten a couple of dozen responses.
Where did everyone go?

Regarding the red eye problem, angle off axis is pretty much
the only solution.  The red eye problem is a reflection off
the back of the eyeball.  When the angle is large, that reflection
does not make it out of the eye, hitting the inside of the eye.
A pre-flash helps a little on humans; I don't know about owls.

I've seen a lot of "white eye" with flash on birds.  I've never seen
red eye, but then I've never used a flash on an owl.

Roger
Bill Hilton - 14 Jul 2005 04:38 GMT
> Roger writes ...
>
>Regarding the red eye problem, angle off axis is pretty
>much the only solution.  The red eye problem is a reflection
>off the back of the eyeball.

Hi Roger,

Yes, I know what causes it and 'theoretically' how to avoid it, but was
looking for specific data on how far off-camera one has to move the
flash for Great Horned owls at these distances.

>A pre-flash helps a little on humans; I don't know about owls.

At this distance the pre-flash (red eye reduction mode option) doesn't
help.

>I've seen a lot of "white eye" with flash on birds.  I've never
>seen red eye

I can fix that (grin) ... here are four crops showing the problem using
the flash bracket like I normally do, then what happens when I move the
flash about 18" or so further off (about as long as the off-camera
flash cord will stretch before it pulls too much on the tripod) ...
http://members.aol.com/bhilton665/owl_redeye.jpg ... this reduces the
red eye more or less, depending on the bird and how he has his head
turned, I think.  Actually I can live with the bottom-left shot.

When putting this jpeg together I realized I had only seen a couple of
other cases of red eye even when using flash thousands of times ...
then I realized that a Burrowing owl I shot a couple of weeks ago
looked great even though I used fill flash on him too ...
http://members.aol.com/bhilton665/bowl_detail.jpg (this shot the flash
is off but the two previous frames it was on and they look fine) ...
I'm not sure if this Burrowing owl is fine because I'm much closer or
because I'm at a better angle (he was about chest high while the Great
Horned owls were maybe 30 ft off the ground) or because the eye
structure is different in the burrowing owl compared to the GH owl.
Probably the angle and distance.

At any rate I'll keep working on it so long as the owls let me practice
on them.  They were gone today, but we did find a Lesser Nighthawk nest
with newly born fuzzy chicks ...

Bill
Bill Hilton - 17 Jul 2005 21:00 GMT
>I'll keep working on it so long as the owls let me practice
>on them.

Today I found a sure-fire way to avoid red eye in owls ...
http://members.aol.com/bhilton665/redeye_3.jpg

>but we did find a Lesser Nighthawk nest
>with newly born fuzzy chicks

Here is one of the better shots of mom and kids ... these guys blend
into the rocks like no other bird I've seen.
http://members.aol.com/bhilton665/nh.jpg

Bill
Alan Justice - 07 Aug 2005 17:00 GMT
('scuse late replay, haven't been here lately.)

So have you found a workable solution?  I shot some Northern Spotted Owls
using flash as the main light.  I got redeye even when they were looking so
far to the side I could only see one eye (on-camera flash).  But when I
waited for a shaft of early morning light to hit the own sitting on a
moss-covered old growth redwood limb, I did not use flash and the shot was
magical.  Maybe that's the key:  Wait for the right light.  Now isn't that
helpful?

Did you try angling the 550EX up with the catchlight screen up?

--
- Alan Justice

> Anyone using fill flash on large owls and *not* getting red-eye?  I've
> found the early AM pet roosting spot for a Great Horned Owl and two of
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Bill
Bill Hilton - 07 Aug 2005 19:04 GMT
>Alan Justice writes ...
>
> So have you found a workable solution?

Besides shooting the other end, like this ...
http://members.aol.com/bhilton665/redeye_3.jpg ?

Holding the flash off-camera a couple of feet fixed the worst of it,
especially when I moved the flash to the other side of where they are
lQQking.  If I were doing a lot of this I'd just take the flash
completely off-camera and use the ST-E2 remote IR controller, which
still keeps full E-TTL functionality.

>Wait for the right light.

They were back lit ... the 'right light' would require a 10-11 hour
wait :)  In the wild you often have to do the best you can with the
light you have at the moment.

>Did you try angling the 550EX up with the catchlight screen up?

This will only give you a catchlight in the eye (if they are close
enough).  I needed fill light, which is entirely different.

Bill
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.