I've pretty much decided on Gitzo G-1028 legs for backpacking.
The next step up would be the G-1228, which is almost twice
the weight and offers no advantage for me - the camera I'll be
using on those trips weighs about a pound. My question is on
ball heads. Unfortunately (maybe), B&H seems to be out of
stock of most of the Arca-Swiss ball heads. They have the
Gitzo heads in stock. I was hoping to use this tripod/head
combination for another assignment next week. What is the
collective wisdom regarding the Gitzo heads? They are light
and relatively inexpensive. However, I could buy a junk
tripod for my work next week, which will only be used to
support a flash.
Scott Ranger - 03 Dec 2003 02:38 GMT
Take a look at the Kirk ballheads. I have the smaller of the two and it is
bulletproof. Doesn't weigh much and matches well with my Gitzo Explorer
tripod while costing much less. Don't know anything about the Gitzo heads,
but looking at them, they just don't seem to be of the "right" design for
easy use.
Scott
> I've pretty much decided on Gitzo G-1028 legs for backpacking.
> The next step up would be the G-1228, which is almost twice
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> tripod for my work next week, which will only be used to
> support a flash.
Tim Smith - 03 Dec 2003 04:33 GMT
>I've pretty much decided on Gitzo G-1028 legs for backpacking.
>The next step up would be the G-1228, which is almost twice
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>tripod for my work next week, which will only be used to
>support a flash.
Have a look at:
http://acratech.net/PRODUCTS.HTM
I have their ball head (just got it recently), and it works well. Not
quite as smooth as my Linhof Profi II, but a lot lighter.
Clyde - 03 Dec 2003 04:43 GMT
> ave a look at:
>
> http://acratech.net/PRODUCTS.HTM
Damn, $14 for a film can!
Tim Smith - 04 Dec 2003 04:02 GMT
>> ave a look at:
>>
>> http://acratech.net/PRODUCTS.HTM
>
>Damn, $14 for a film can!
Yeah, isn't that something? Precision-machined aluminum film cans for
your 120/220 rolls.
Anyone know of a source for cheaper 120/220 film cans?
Helmut Faugel - 04 Dec 2003 09:35 GMT
> >> ave a look at:
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Anyone know of a source for cheaper 120/220 film cans?
I've no idea if this is helpfull for people outside europe, but
here in Germany Fujifilm offers a 'container' for five 120/220
films, the price is between one or two euro. A picture of this
container can be found here: http://www.isarfoto.com/img/1173b.jpg
And Brenner Fotoversand offers 12 120/220 film cans for 5.49 euro.

Signature
Helmut Faugel
John Eyles - 05 Dec 2003 23:14 GMT
>Anyone know of a source for cheaper 120/220 film cans?
Yes, the standard small-size plastic bottle for prescription
drugs.
John
Jeff Keller - 03 Dec 2003 05:58 GMT
The Acratech ball head is VERY nice. I've been using it for a little over 6
months. The Arca-Swiss clamping system is the way to go if you use any long
telephoto lenses. Focal length seems to be at least as important as camera
weight. Replacing a bunch of quick release plates when you find your tripod
head isn't good enough is very expensive. I went through 3 Bogen heads
before deciding the quick release was a big part of the stability problem.
A lot of trails have weeds/bushes that might be too tall to see over with
the G1028. Also consider a 3 section leg rather than a 4 section leg. It
saves weight and is generally more stable. (I use a G1026 and a G1227 ...
both have their pluses)
Finally read through the reallyrightstuff.com manual. It has some good
thinking put into it.
Good luck,
-jeff
> >I've pretty much decided on Gitzo G-1028 legs for backpacking.
> >The next step up would be the G-1228, which is almost twice
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> I have their ball head (just got it recently), and it works well. Not
> quite as smooth as my Linhof Profi II, but a lot lighter.
Clyde - 03 Dec 2003 04:43 GMT
> What is the
> collective wisdom regarding the Gitzo heads?
Servicable but you'll end up buying an AS or clone eventually. The
offset head of the Gitzo is funky. The AS is a joy.
MDCORE - 03 Dec 2003 13:43 GMT
>Servicable but you'll end up buying an AS or clone eventually. The
>offset head of the Gitzo is funky. The AS is a joy.
The offset head of the Gitzo IS kind of funky, but on the Explorer tripod
mentioned earlier in this thread, it is just the thing. Because you HAVE to go
horizontal with the center column to get down low with the explorer, having the
ability to rotate where the notch is on the ball head makes it easier to get
the camera in position.
Dukephoto
Clyde - 03 Dec 2003 18:53 GMT
> >Servicable but you'll end up buying an AS or clone eventually. The
> >offset head of the Gitzo is funky. The AS is a joy.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> having the ability to rotate where the notch is on the ball head makes it
> easier to get the camera in position.
The OP was talking about the Mountaineer, which I have, and it certainly
doesn't need the Gitzo head, which I used to have. Personally, I
wouldn't buy an Explorer but whatever suits you.
Andy Williams - 04 Dec 2003 05:28 GMT
Thanks to all who replied. It seems the bottom line is that this is
not a decision to be made in haste based on retailers' stock. I will
buy a cheap tripod to use with my flash next week and mull over the
decision on the ultimate choice for my backcountry equipment.
David C. Ramey - 25 Dec 2003 00:55 GMT
I used to frequent this newsgroup about 3 years ago. I have been gone for
so long, I thought a reintroduction would be in order. I make my living as
a photographer, specializing in Events and Sports. I also take some Nature
photos, but not as many as I would like and I am trying to include more
Nature into my busy schedule. Last year I switched from film to digital. I
use Nikon equipment. I hope I can renew some of my lost techniques, learn
some new ones and contribute where I can. I am based in Alaska.

Signature
David C. Ramey
David Ramey Photography
photo@davidrameyphotography.com
www.davidrameyphotography.com