Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Photo Technique / Nature Photography / May 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

A few boring flowers

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jan Bøgh - 27 Apr 2006 16:30 GMT
Hi

Todat I tried another use of my 300 mm than the ususal. I have retrieved my
very old extension tubes without any kind of automatics and combined the
whole set with my good, old and very faithful 300 mm and a flash.

http://jan.boegh.net/Album/AdHoc/slides/2006.04.27-16.46.19.html

A few examples of the result here:

http://jan.boegh.net/Album/Natur/skoven/slides/2006.04.27-11.12.55.html
http://jan.boegh.net/Album/Natur/skoven/slides/2006.04.27-11.14.html
http://jan.boegh.net/Album/Natur/skoven/slides/2006.04.27-11.40.01.html

It's a very different way of doing closeups, but I find it quite rewarding.

regards

Signature

A few photos can be found on http://jan.boegh.net/foto.htm 

silvercelt - 29 Apr 2006 14:01 GMT
They are not nice photos, I like the second and third one best
Kernix - 08 May 2006 18:28 GMT
How far away are you from the subjects? To me they look like they could
have used a flash to punch up the brightness - they look a little
underexposed or just flat due to the lack of light. Composisiton is
fine though.
Jan Bøgh - 08 May 2006 20:31 GMT
Kernix skrev i 1147109317.434166.16630@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com
dette:
> How far away are you from the subjects? To me they look like they
> could have used a flash to punch up the brightness - they look a
> little underexposed or just flat due to the lack of light.
> Composisiton is fine though.

A couples of meters. And I have used a little flash - iirc 1/4th af full
power from a Nikon SB-800 flash.
The two first is as I intended, when it comes to exposure - I wanted to pass
on the feeling of a dark forrest flor to the spectator. I think You can see
the use of flash on the second (the anemone) - the almost absolutely lack of
shadow from the stamens.

My reason for posting was I found it a little curious to use a 300 mm for
closeups. Usually I would have used my 100 mm Macro instead.

This weekend I used my 300 mm i a more usual way:
http://jan.boegh.net/Album/Natur/skoven/slides/2006.05.07-13.31.03.html
A real wild roe deer. I used between 1 and 2 hours to get reasonable near
the creature. Next time in a zoo :-)

regards
Jan

Signature

A few photos can be found on http://jan.boegh.net/foto.htm
Pics from an old part of Lisboa in Portugal:
http://jan.boegh.net/Album/Verden/Lissabon/Alfama/slides/_DSC0244.html

Kernix - 08 May 2006 21:30 GMT
Well, I've read and agree is that the best use of flash is when you
can;t tell that a flash was used.

The 300 mm gave you the nice shallow dof which is nice.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.