Did you ever try a tripod? Used to say same about Nikkor 400/5.6....
> I might be looking for a dream, but is there a REAL sharp zoom in the
> 100-400 range that works with my D70.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> --
> Nikon D70, Santee, CA
Jimmy G - 09 Jul 2005 17:45 GMT
I now feel that it's inherent lens design that is my nemesis.
At 400mm & max aperture, images are soft. When reducing both, I get much
better images.
I STILL want a fixed 400mm lens. Any deals?
>I might be looking for a dream, but is there a REAL sharp zoom in the
> 100-400 range that works with my D70.
>
> I have a 80-400VR, but am just not satisfied with the resolution as
> compared to my other lenses.
Learn to use it properly.
It's your longlens technique that's to blame, not the lens.
And of course resolution has nothing at all to do with the lens, so you're
talking nonsense even there.
> Something in that price range is a must ($1000-1500).
A 400mm prime will set you back about 10 times as much.
Jimmy G - 14 Jul 2005 03:46 GMT
Why respond like a total jerk when I asked a perfectly polite question.
FU
Jeroen Wenting - 14 Jul 2005 19:05 GMT
and a perfectly polite answer.
If you can't take the heat, don't start the engine.
He asked for a good lens when he has a perfectly good lens already.
The logical conclusion is that he doesn't know how to use that lens, which
is what I told him.
Seems you're incapable of civil concourse...
> Why respond like a total jerk when I asked a perfectly polite question.
>
> FU
Randy Stewart - 21 Jul 2005 15:03 GMT
> >I might be looking for a dream, but is there a REAL sharp zoom in the
> > 100-400 range that works with my D70.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> >
> A 400mm prime will set you back about 10 times as much.
While your reply on lens useage might be correct, there is no information
provided to suggest that it is. A "prime" 400mm lens of good quality should
yield noticably superior images to this zoom used under equal conditions.
A "prime 400mm lens" will cost $10,000 - $15,000? You'd have to hunt hard
for one at that price, and if you found one, you'd be a fool to pay that
much for it.
Either your answers are misleading or ignorant - best left to others.
Jeroen Wenting - 24 Jul 2005 09:33 GMT
>> >I might be looking for a dream, but is there a REAL sharp zoom in the
>> > 100-400 range that works with my D70.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> for one at that price, and if you found one, you'd be a fool to pay that
> much for it.
That's what the 400 f/2.8 AF-S costs over here...
If you don't know what you're talking about best keep your mouth shut.
Randy Stewart - 27 Jul 2005 15:31 GMT
> >> >I might be looking for a dream, but is there a REAL sharp zoom in the
> >> > 100-400 range that works with my D70.
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> That's what the 400 f/2.8 AF-S costs over here...
> If you don't know what you're talking about best keep your mouth shut.
As I said, you'd be a fool.....
Randy Stewart - 27 Jul 2005 15:35 GMT
> >> >I might be looking for a dream, but is there a REAL sharp zoom in the
> >> > 100-400 range that works with my D70.
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> That's what the 400 f/2.8 AF-S costs over here...
> If you don't know what you're talking about best keep your mouth shut.
As I said, you'd be a fool, since there are many other lenses meeting the
requirement of the orginal poster at a small fraction of such cost. Then
consider that the camera cannot begin to capture your lens selection. I
though we were responding to beginning photographer, not someone who buys
equipmeent as a status symbol.
Jeroen Wenting - 31 Jul 2005 06:35 GMT
>> >> >I might be looking for a dream, but is there a REAL sharp zoom in the
>> >> > 100-400 range that works with my D70.
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> though we were responding to beginning photographer, not someone who buys
> equipmeent as a status symbol.
Seeing as he's clearly not satisfied with the 80-400, the next step up in
quality IS the 400mm AF-S...
If he wants a lens in the 400mm range that is.