> Hi!
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Thanks
> Eric D.
Check the Leica line. Better than any of these.
>Hi!
>
>I'm looking for a news group for binoculars
You might want to try sci.astro.amateur. The requirements are a bit
more stringent for astronomy, but any pair of good astro binoculars
would make a good pair of terrestrial binoculars.
I think that both Sky & Telescope
<URL:http://www.skyandtelescope.com/> and Astronomy
<URL:http://www.astronomy.com/> magazines have good articles online on
how to pick a pair of binoculars.
>if not, I'm trying to decide witch of the three model is the best
>quality to purchase. I like the outdoors, it has to be fog and
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>stock yet, but the dealer said it's comming soon. I wondered if
>anybody have any experience with all three models.
In general, you want to look for fully (i.e., every air to glass
surface) multi-coated optics. The web sites mentioned above will
explain the differences in prism types (roof vs. porro) and prism
glass (Bk7 vs. Bak4), and the trade offs involved.
The Nikons should be nice, if a bit pricey.
I'm definitely not impressed with Bushnell telescopes, so I probably
wouldn't buy their binoculars.
Canon, Celestron, Pentax, and Minolta also make nice binocluars.

Signature
Brian Reynolds | "It's just like flying a spaceship.
reynolds@panix.com | You push some buttons and see
http://www.panix.com/~reynolds/ | what happens." -- Zapp Brannigan
NAR# 54438 |