Photo Forum / Film Photography / Medium format / May 2004
Newbie interested in experimenting with MF - suggestions?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Chris Brown - 10 May 2004 14:24 GMT Hi all. I've been lurking here for a little while, and I'm hoping I can pick up a few pointers.
I'm currently shooting both digital and 35mm. Digital-wise, I'm using a 10D SLR, mainly with prime lenses, and tend to use mostly aperture-priority or full manual, using partial metering to expose for the highlights, as though I was shooting slides. For 35mm, I'm using a Voigtlander Bessa-R rangefinder with either Velvia or B&W print film, and in both media types, I find the "manual" method of shooting suits my style.
Of late, I've become curious about medium format equipment, and I think it would be fun to experiment, but I have absolutely no clue about equipment. There's plenty of stuff for 35mm lens and camera systems on the 'net, but MF stuff seems to be a bit rarer.
So if I was to look at renting some medium format equipment and shooting a few slides, given my background, what sort of thing would be a good starting point? Intuitively, I'm thinking I want to be looking at either a MF rangefinder or SLR, on the basis that those types of cameras would be most familliar, but am willing to consider alternatives. Any ideas?
JR - 10 May 2004 15:51 GMT Mamiya 6 or 7 are great RF types of cameras. You can always play around with a Holga for like $30, or look into LOTS of good used equipment. I bought a Mamiya RZ67 II system, but that isn't the cheapest. The Mamiya 645e system can be had for $700 new. The Pentax 645 system is nice as well, and the Pentax 67 system is a great alternative to the mamiya 7. Its more of an SLR type than a RF type but it's nice. The thing would be to start at the size of negative you want. 6x4.5, 6x6, 6x7, or 6x9. All of them are considered medium format. This first choice will cut down your choices in cameras. For example, unless you get the Hassy H1 system at around $5K, you must go 6x6 for a Hassy...If you want 6x7 in a RF style camerta, the Mamiya 7 is the way to go. If 645 slr style, the Mamiya 645, Pentax 645, Contax 645 are all available. If you want the option at a later date, then the Mamiya RZ can take 645, 6x6, and 6x7 backs. 6x9 is a bigger negative but there are some issues with film flatness on some cameras.
JR
David J. Littleboy - 10 May 2004 15:56 GMT > Hi all. I've been lurking here for a little while, and I'm hoping I can pick > up a few pointers. [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > rangefinder or SLR, on the basis that those types of cameras would be most > familliar, but am willing to consider alternatives. Any ideas? Other than the Pentax 67, you'll find the MF SLRs _quite_ different beasts to work with than 35mm and digital SLRs. And even the Pentax is large enough that you may find it weird. If you want to try an MF SLR, I'd recommend buying, not renting, on the grounds that it'll take time to get used to an MF SLR.
For renting, I'd think the Mamiya 7 would make sense, since it should be similar to the Bessa. The 80mm lens is a tad wider than a 50mm lens (it's more like a 42mm lens), but it's a sharp lens.
One problem with MF rangefinders, though, is that there aren't a lot of options that work well for portraits: lenses don't focus close enough (Mamiya 7), or don't exist at all. Also, close ups are difficult. For portraits and closeups, MF SLRs are, of course, wonderful.
One nasty problem with MF is getting your images digitized. MF scanners are expensive. But even 645 with the Nikon 9000 will knock your socks off relative to 35mm or the 10D, even at A4, if you are at all fussy about detail.
David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan
Chris Brown - 10 May 2004 16:10 GMT >For renting, I'd think the Mamiya 7 would make sense, since it should be >similar to the Bessa. The 80mm lens is a tad wider than a 50mm lens (it's >more like a 42mm lens), but it's a sharp lens. My web searches thus far have suggested that that Mamiya is worth a look, so it's useful to see a couple of posts that seem to confirm this.
What are they like to carry on mountain hikes? I've gone on fairly long treks with a 10D and 3 lenses, and wouldn't fancy carrying much more weight than that.
>One problem with MF rangefinders, though, is that there aren't a lot of >options that work well for portraits: lenses don't focus close enough >(Mamiya 7), or don't exist at all. Also, close ups are difficult. For >portraits and closeups, MF SLRs are, of course, wonderful. My main use would be for landscape stuff - my 10D and the 50mm f/1.4 and 100mm f/2.8 lenses give me pretty much everything I want for potraits, but the extra detail offered by MF for wide-angle landscape shots is quite attractive. If anything, the 80mm lens you mentioned would be a bit long for my likeing. I'm mostly using a 35mm lens on my Bessa, and like the angle of view that gives me.
>One nasty problem with MF is getting your images digitized. This has occured to me. I'm thinking that if I stick to slides, then if I just want to look at the photos, I can use a loupe or project them. For prints up to A4, I've found that I ncan get acceptable results from 35mm and Velvia by using the 10D and a macro lens to photograph the slide and then tweaking it in Photoshop. If you haven't tried this, I can say it works better than you might expect, and produces decent results up to A4, although obviously it'll be a long way from getting the extra detail from a 6*6 piece of Velvia for a large print.
Scanning technology will also improve over time, of course, and it's not like the slides will be going anywhere in the meantime. In p[articular, flatbed scanners are improving dramatically, and who knows what they will be capable of in a few years?
Thanks for the input
Michael Benveniste - 10 May 2004 17:17 GMT > Other than the Pentax 67, you'll find the MF SLRs _quite_ different beasts > to work with than 35mm and digital SLRs. And even the Pentax is large enough > that you may find it weird. If you want to try an MF SLR, I'd recommend > buying, not renting, on the grounds that it'll take time to get used to an > MF SLR. I'm trying this route myself. I've purchased a Pentax 645 with 75mm and 135mm lenses. So around midweek, I'll get to see a) what condition the stuff is in and b) if my poor aging eyes will let me focus accurately enough to make use of it.
 Signature Michael Benveniste -- mhb-offer@clearether.com Spam and UCE professionally evaluated for $419. Use this email address only to submit mail for evaluation.
Michael Benveniste - 13 May 2004 02:46 GMT >I'm trying this route myself. I've purchased a Pentax 645 with 75mm and >135mm lenses. So around midweek, I'll get to see a) what condition the >stuff is in and b) if my poor aging eyes will let me focus accurately >enough to make use of it. Follow up. Everything looks to be in good shape. Had a bit of a scare when I first looked through the finder, but someone had twisted the diopter adjustment almost off the scale. After recentering, things seem to snap in and out of focus just fine.
The sacrificial roll of $1.49 NPC has been loaded, and I'm about to blast away. Ah, the joy of a new toy.
 Signature Michael Benveniste -- mhb-offer@clearether.com Spam and UCE professionally evaluated for $419. Use this email address only to submit mail for evaluation.
Pete - 13 May 2004 14:29 GMT You know, you can try out MF very cheaply by getting yourself a nice vintage folder or TLR. And it doesn't have to be an expensive Super Ikonta or Rolleiflex. I love folders, myself, simply because they are so uncomplicated. Little can go wrong with these. They are basically just a support for the roll film and a lens/shutter combination. There are zero electronics, and other than the shutter and lens, virtually zero mechanicals as well.
I like Polaroid pack film cameras too. Those are medium format too, and even almost large format.
My picks for inexpensive folders would be Agfa Isolette or any of the 6x9 or 6x6 Zeiss-Ikon Nettars. The lesser, mid-level lenses like Apotars on the Agfas and Novars in the Zeiss cameras are plenty good when used to best advantage (stopped down, as usual, and with a hood). You might also be surprised at how good a very cheap plastic Holga or Woca camera can be, and how much fun it is to experiment with one.
Chris Brown - 22 May 2004 22:41 GMT >You know, you can try out MF very cheaply by getting yourself a nice vintage >folder or TLR. And it doesn't have to be an expensive Super Ikonta or >Rolleiflex. Update: I'm now the proud owner of a Yashimat 124G TLR, after a most productive trawl round various London camera shops (saw an absolutely *gorgeous* large format field camera which folded into a really nice walnut/cherry wood (not sure which) case - a real work of art *drool*). It's in lovely condition, and I got it for a reasonable price. Now loaded up with a roll of Velvia, and we'll see how it goes. :-)
Also invested in an Epson 4870, on the basis that it does a reasonable job on 35mm as well (it's giving me better A3 prints from Velvia than I was expecting).
Thanks for all your help guys. Now if I can *just* get used to this mirror-image finder business...
Michael Benveniste - 13 May 2004 05:46 GMT >I'm trying this route myself. I've purchased a Pentax 645 with 75mm and >135mm lenses. So around midweek, I'll get to see a) what condition the >stuff is in and b) if my poor aging eyes will let me focus accurately >enough to make use of it. Follow up. Everything looks to be in good shape. Had a bit of a scare when I first looked through the finder, but someone had twisted the diopter adjustment almost off the scale. After recentering, things seem to snap in and out of focus just fine.
The sacrificial roll of $1.49 NPC has been loaded, and I'm about to blast away. Ah, the joy of a new toy.
 Signature Michael Benveniste -- mhb-offer@clearether.com Spam and UCE professionally evaluated for $419. Use this email address only to submit mail for evaluation.
Bob Monaghan - 11 May 2004 00:38 GMT WARNING!!! looking at projected medium format slides may be hazardous to your tolerance of lesser quality images from 35mm and digital formats! ;-)
renting is a good idea since ergonomics are usually more important to most users than minor differences between lens quality etc., see list of rental sources by state/phone at http://medfmt.8k.com/mf/rental.html
see http://medfmt.8k.com/mf/index.html and mf/cameras.html for camera links and related buying articles (at top of mf/index.html)
see Danny Gonzalez's pro's hands-on camera reviews and pros/cons notes at http://medfmt.8k.com/mf/gindex.html
see mf/features.html for a chart of what camera types best match sundry types of shooting situations (portraits..)....
see mf/system.html for systems oriented approach to camera system buys
see mf/available.html for lenses available by format and cost/brand (B&H)
see mf/value.html for best buys on MF gear and mf/budget.html for budget MF options under $1,000 US$
see http://medfmt.8k.com/bronslideprojp.html for MF slide projector options - there are lots of older used MF slide projectors for 645 and 6x6 slides which are available at often very low cost; 6x7cm and larger options are more $$ or older/bulkier in budget range ;-)
if you are looking at current cameras, the B&H catalog for pro photographers which covers MF and LF gear is a great resource (may be free if you sound like a likely buyer ;-), call or email B&H etc.); lists cameras, lenses, accessories and all that ;-)
used gear prices are now at historic lows in real dollar terms for many MF SLRs etc.; you can probably try out a basic camera kit, and if you don't like it, sell it on ebay with little loss in $$ (versus weeks of renting costs anyway ;-)
keep in mind that you may end up with multiple MF kits over time, many of us do - a TLR is handy for some types of situations, an SLR for closeups or telephotos and so on, RF for fast or dim light work, mini-view MF for architecture, and so on. MF lets you justify buying all these toys because each is a bit different or useful in creating particular kinds of images ;-)
hope this helps
bobm
 Signature *********************************************************************** * Robert Monaghan POB 752182 Southern Methodist Univ. Dallas Tx 75275 * ********************Standard Disclaimers Apply*************************
Chris Brown - 13 May 2004 11:27 GMT >WARNING!!! looking at projected medium format slides may be hazardous to >your tolerance of lesser quality images from 35mm and digital formats! ;-) Lots of useful links there, thanks muchly!
>keep in mind that you may end up with multiple MF kits over time, many of >us do - a TLR is handy for some types of situations, an SLR for closeups >or telephotos and so on, RF for fast or dim light work, mini-view MF for >architecture, and so on. MF lets you justify buying all these toys because >each is a bit different or useful in creating particular kinds of images >;-) Uh-oh, not too sure my wife will be impressed by that. ;-)
|
|
|