Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Medium format / April 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

source for folder bellows?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Stacey - 26 Apr 2004 06:08 GMT
I have a neat old welti 6X4.5 range finder with a tessar. It has an
interesting "bed focus" rather than front cell focusing and the first
images look promising but... the bellows has some pinholes and basically
are shot. They are too brittle to bother with patching. I already did some
patching and got about 4 good images then new holes appeared!

So my question, where is a good source for small bellows? This camera seems
worthy of spending some money on but of course not worth spending $300 on
either. The camera seems well made but the bellows aren't as good as say
the ikonta's bellows. Unfortunatly the 6X4.5 ikonta bellows is too small on
the lens end so I can't pirate one from a dead one of those. TIA for any
advice.
Signature


 Stacey

RWatson767 - 26 Apr 2004 06:47 GMT
Stacey
>source for folder bellows?

Unfortunatly the 6X4.5 ikonta bellows is too small on the lens end so I can't
pirate one from a dead one of those. TIA for any
advice.

Try a bellows from a polaroid land ca mera. The 100-200 series. They are
usually cheap at thrift stores and the like.
Bob  AZ
Marv Soloff - 26 Apr 2004 08:37 GMT
Second the Polaroid bellows - but try for one from a series 80 or 80a
Polaroid.

Regards,

Marv

> Stacey
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> usually cheap at thrift stores and the like.
> Bob  AZ
Gordon Moat - 26 Apr 2004 20:54 GMT
> I have a neat old welti 6X4.5 range finder with a tessar. It has an
> interesting "bed focus" rather than front cell focusing and the first
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> advice.
> --

Some of the older roll film Polaroid folder cameras have very good bellows
materials. Unfortunately, some trimming would be needed to fit it into a
smaller folder camera. The material is slightly thinner than the older bellows
materials of other cameras. You could cut on two sides, then glue it to a
smaller size, then install, and still have it close. With cutting down other
bellows, often it could be too large, and not allow the folder camera to
close.

The really small bellows are very tough to find. The one source I sent you I
think sold out of the smallest bellows very quickly. I find it much easier to
repair the larger cameras. I have done one 6x9 repair using a cut down
Polaroid bellows off one of the old pack film cameras. One issue is that
larger pleats in the replacement bellows might make the final frame even
smaller.

Anyway, I wish you luck with your bellows repair/replacement. Hopefully, you
will get your folder camera working well, and enjoy using that camera.

Ciao!

Gordon Moat
A G Studio
<http://www.allgstudio.com
jjs - 26 Apr 2004 21:33 GMT
Stacey, can you post the actual dimensions of the bellows you need? I have a
couple that I can check. If they fit, they are yours for postage.
Stacey - 27 Apr 2004 01:07 GMT
> Stacey, can you post the actual dimensions of the bellows you need? I have
> a couple that I can check. If they fit, they are yours for postage.

The outside dimensions in mm: the small end is 45mm X 43mm, the big end is
55mm X 65mm and it's 70mm long extended. Thanx for checking!
Signature


 Stacey

jjs - 27 Apr 2004 01:37 GMT
> The outside dimensions in mm: the small end is 45mm X 43mm, the big end is
> 55mm X 65mm and it's 70mm long extended. Thanx for checking!

Excellent. I'll look in the Big Box tonight.
jjs - 27 Apr 2004 02:39 GMT
> > The outside dimensions in mm: the small end is 45mm X 43mm, the big end is
> > 55mm X 65mm and it's 70mm long extended. Thanx for checking!
>
> Excellent. I'll look in the Big Box tonight.

You are right, Stacey. It is a difficult size. I have two (front) 37x43mm
by (rear) 70x90. Sorry.
Stacey - 27 Apr 2004 02:40 GMT
>> The outside dimensions in mm: the small end is 45mm X 43mm, the big end
>> is 55mm X 65mm and it's 70mm long extended. Thanx for checking!
>
> Excellent. I'll look in the Big Box tonight.

Thanx to microsoft worms, the e-mail connected to this account fills up
every 15 minutes. You'll have to respond here....
Signature


 Stacey

Winfried Buechsenschuetz - 28 Apr 2004 09:45 GMT

> The really small bellows are very tough to find.

Some months ago I bought a bag full of bellows of various dimensions.
I found two bellows (out of 50 pcs) which seem to have dimensions
similar to 6x4.5 (one of these in bad shape) but I have to check this
in detail on a 6x4.5 folder.

> One issue is that
> larger pleats in the replacement bellows might make the final frame even
> smaller.

ACK. I found that there are at least three or four slightly different
dimensions for the rear end of bellows designed for 6x9 format, and
depending on the shape of the last pleat and the shapes of the edges
of the camera to glue it on (on most cameras you would have to destroy
quite a few rivets and folded seams of sheet metal parts to remove the
film screen) they will reduce the effective image size.

In the bag full of bellows I also found some designed for 6.5x11
format but I am everything but sure whether their rear end will fit a
6x9 film screen when cutting down the last two or three pleats.

Winfried
Gordon Moat - 28 Apr 2004 19:54 GMT
> > The really small bellows are very tough to find.
>
> Some months ago I bought a bag full of bellows of various dimensions.
> I found two bellows (out of 50 pcs) which seem to have dimensions
> similar to 6x4.5 (one of these in bad shape) but I have to check this
> in detail on a 6x4.5 folder.

On my one 645 folder, the original leather and cloth backed bellows was easy to repair. I
checked one source for a replacement, but nothing was nice the correct size. I think too large
a bellows, and the camera would no longer close.

> > One issue is that
> > larger pleats in the replacement bellows might make the final frame even
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> quite a few rivets and folded seams of sheet metal parts to remove the
> film screen) they will reduce the effective image size.

I had an okay time with the AGFA folders, since the metal film rails are held in with screws.
The long sides were okay, but on the short edges, the bellows intrudes slightly. Anyway, I am
still getting 56 mm by 85 mm, so the intrusion is slight.

> In the bag full of bellows I also found some designed for 6.5x11
> format but I am everything but sure whether their rear end will fit a
> 6x9 film screen when cutting down the last two or three pleats.

I thought about using the larger Polaroid pack film camera bellows on the 6x9 folders. It is
thin enough, and strong enough, so I could cut down four sides, and glue it to the smaller
size. However, I think the larger pleat folds would intrude more on the frame. The older
slightly smaller roll film Polaroid bellows would have less of a problem. With the 6.5x11 that
you found, one thing to check is the pleat depth, and hopefully it is close to the original.
Also, the thickness when reglued could be another issue, and could prevent the camera from
closing.

Ciao!

Gordon Moat
A G Studio
<http://www.allgstudio.com
Stacey - 29 Apr 2004 00:14 GMT
> I have a neat old welti 6X4.5 range finder with a tessar. It has an
> interesting "bed focus" rather than front cell focusing and the first
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> small on the lens end so I can't pirate one from a dead one of those. TIA
> for any advice.

Thanx for all the advice, I found a place in the UK who quoted me ~$40 to
make a replacement from the original. Sounded reasonable to me and I'll
report back when it arrives as to the fit and quality etc..
Signature


 Stacey

Lassi =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hippel=E4inen?= - 29 Apr 2004 07:08 GMT
> Thanx for all the advice, I found a place in the UK who quoted me ~$40 to
> make a replacement from the original. Sounded reasonable to me and I'll
> report back when it arrives as to the fit and quality etc..

Has anybody bothered to ask a nearby shoemaker? Seems to me that the
requirements of bellows (supple, weatherproof, tight seams, etc.) are
pretty much the same as for boots...

-- Lassi
Stacey - 29 Apr 2004 08:14 GMT
Lassi Hippeläinen wrote:

>> Thanx for all the advice, I found a place in the UK who quoted me ~$40 to
>> make a replacement from the original. Sounded reasonable to me and I'll
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> requirements of bellows (supple, weatherproof, tight seams, etc.) are
> pretty much the same as for boots...

The problem with folding cameras is the leather is VERY thin so it will
still fold up. This bellows for example must extend to 70mm yet fold to 7mm
for the camera to close. BTW are their still actual shoemakers anywhere?
Signature


 Stacey

Lassi =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hippel=E4inen?= - 29 Apr 2004 08:37 GMT
> Lassi Hippeläinen wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> still fold up. This bellows for example must extend to 70mm yet fold to 7mm
> for the camera to close. BTW are their still actual shoemakers anywhere?

I didn't mean something as thick as in cowboy boots. The materials used
in handgloves, for example, should be better. For $40 you'd expect to
get something as simple as bellows.

And yes, there are people who still make a living that way. Either
making or repairing boots, shoes, gloves, saddles etc. I'm living
downtown, and I've seen two shops within walking distance from my home.

-- Lassi
Stacey - 30 Apr 2004 04:00 GMT
Lassi Hippeläinen wrote:

> And yes, there are people who still make a living that way. Either
> making or repairing boots, shoes, gloves, saddles etc. I'm living
> downtown, and I've seen two shops within walking distance from my home.

Oh I've seen shoe -repair- shops, but haven't seen anyone who is hand making
shoes lately..
Signature


 Stacey

Winfried Buechsenschuetz - 30 Apr 2004 07:06 GMT
> The problem with folding cameras is the leather is VERY thin so it will
> still fold up.

Actually most bellows of folding cameras are NOT made of leather but
from a multi-layer material, mostly with a synthetic coat (there WERE
synthetic materials before WWII), strips of cardboard to hold the
pleats, and an inner liner of rubberized cloth (similar or identical
to shutter curtain material). There are some bellows with different
design but I did not stumble across a genuine leather bellows yet.

There are some 'recipes' available on the net recommending substitutes
for the original materials which probably are hard to get nowadays
(except for shutter curtain material).

> This bellows for example must extend to 70mm yet fold to 7mm
> for the camera to close. BTW are their still actual shoemakers anywhere?

As mentioned by others most 'shoemakers' are just 'low grade
craftsmen' (as they are specified by german law which prohibited most
craftsmen from opening their own shop unless they have a master
degree). There are very few still making shoes, but handmade shoes are
expensive. I know a (real) shoemaker in the neighbourhood who did a
great jobs in repairing some camera bags for me, one required quite a
bit of hand stitching.

Winfried
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.