Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Medium format / April 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Really Impressive Bokeh-Old Polaroid Lenses

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jim-Ed Browne - 24 Apr 2004 22:11 GMT
Check out the optics in the old rollfilm consumer Polaroids sometime.
I'm not sure what the best way to use them with a modern system camera
might be, but I've seen them put on small technical and press cameras.
I've also seen the 80mm or so front standard assenblies of the old
Pathfinders mounted on tubes for use with 35mm focal plane cameras.
They can be used then with aperture priority or by figuring out the
f-stops of the Waterhouse stops.

You want bokeh, there it is.
Minolta shooter (Colyn) - 24 Apr 2004 23:10 GMT
>Check out the optics in the old rollfilm consumer Polaroids sometime.
>I'm not sure what the best way to use them with a modern system camera
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> You want bokeh, there it is.

I put a Wollensak Raptar 127mm f/4.5 lens from a pathfinder 110 on a
model 250 pack camera.. never thought to try it on a 35..

If I don't sell the camera, I might try it..

Colyn Goodson

http://home.swbell.net/colyng

Camera manuals and mercury battery fix
http://www.colyngoodson.com
Bandicoot - 25 Apr 2004 01:01 GMT
> >Check out the optics in the old rollfilm consumer Polaroids sometime.
> >I'm not sure what the best way to use them with a modern system camera
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> If I don't sell the camera, I might try it..

One of my 'when-I-get-around-to-it' projects is to drill a hole in a metal
Pentax body cap to mount a Polaroid MP4 Prontor shutter in.  I can then use
my MP4 lenses on a 35mm camera with bellows, or indeed in the field with
moderate convenience by using a helicoid extension tube.

Any of the MP4 lenses could be used, and I expect I'd get infinity focus
with the 135mm and possibly the 127mm with the helicoid, probably not with
the 105mm or less.  That would then be a 135mm portrait lens with a leaf
shutter that would sync. flash at any speed - stick an auxilliary finder in
the hotshoe and it wouldn't be impossibly inconvenient to use.

But the real reason I want to play about with this is for macro work.  Even
with MLU a focal plane shutter produces more movement than a leaf shutter,
and with the 35mm and 17mm lenses one is talking serious magnification.

May or may not be worthwhile, but I have (and use) the lenses already and
have the body cap and a spare shutter so what's to lose?  If it works out I
might make one of these up for my 6x6 system as well, though I doubt I'd get
infinity focus on it.

Peter
Dan Fromm - 25 Apr 2004 12:42 GMT
> <large snip>
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>But the real reason I want to play about with this is for macro work.
Even
>with MLU a focal plane shutter produces more movement than a leaf shutter,
>and with the 35mm and 17mm lenses one is talking serious magnification.
> Peter

A #1 Prontor Press will sync flash at any speed up to its highest,
1/125.  If you want to play this game get a cock and shoot Copal #1,
top speed 1/400.

Re short macro lenses on a 35 mm camera, by an odd coincidence I have
the short Tominons, also others.  Its all copy stand work.  With my
FM2n mirror slap and other sources of vibration aren't issues.

Cheers,

Dan
Jim-Ed Browne - 25 Apr 2004 18:51 GMT
My error: the Pathfinder series with its "legit" lenses is NOT what
you want. In fact because so many have been scrapped out for this
okay-but-nothing-special optic it might really become collectible! The
Highlander, a 30 Series rollfilm Polaroid with a rotating front
element for focussing, and the 800, the latest of the 95-type (40
Series rollfilm, front std moves on a very nice rack)are what we are
after. They have a simple shutter and Waterhouse stops selected by a
wheel rotated to a particular EV number. For SLR or focal plane camera
use you take apart the front and remove the shutter blade.

If I had a modern FP Hassy body... These are a "secret weapon" used by
a couple people in the classic portrait business. Having money,
usually they remount the lenses in a "real" shutter,for cosmetic
reasons.
Bandicoot - 25 Apr 2004 18:52 GMT
[SNIP]

> A #1 Prontor Press will sync flash at any speed up to its highest,
> 1/125.  If you want to play this game get a cock and shoot Copal
> #1, top speed 1/400.

Yes, that would be a lot nicer - but I don't happen to have a spare one
knocking around, which I do with the PP.  If the thing works nicely I
suppose I might switch shutters.

Peter
Dan Fromm - 25 Apr 2004 23:41 GMT
> [SNIP]
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Peter
You'll survive with a PP, as I did for several years with an ex-MP4
Copal Press #1.  Stuck all sorts of lenses in front of it.  But my
life has improved since I lucked into an affordable cock & shoot Copal
1 <g>.

Cheers,

Dan
Bandicoot - 25 Apr 2004 23:26 GMT
> > [SNIP]
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Cheers,

I have Copals on a couple of my LF lenses and they are indeed very nice -
finding a good price on one is a rare event though: I envy you that!

Peter
Nick Zentena - 26 Apr 2004 00:51 GMT
> I have Copals on a couple of my LF lenses and they are indeed very nice -
> finding a good price on one is a rare event though: I envy you that!

 The 150mm Xenars come in Compur #1. Usually don't cost very much.
 
 Nick
Bandicoot - 26 Apr 2004 12:21 GMT
> > I have Copals on a couple of my LF lenses and they are indeed very nice -
> > finding a good price on one is a rare event though: I envy you that!
>
>   The 150mm Xenars come in Compur #1. Usually don't cost very much.
>
>   Nick

That's a good point: I don't need one (have a 150mm Sironar-N that I'm happy
with) but the Xenar used would probably cost less than a new shutter,
specially if I looked out for one with damaged optics.  Thanks: I'll keep
that idea in mind...

Peter
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.