> Hi, What can you recommend as a user friendly light meter for a Fuji
> GW670 11 with 90 ml lens? I especially like Candid street photos.
> thanks.....
For candid street photos, shoot (color or B&W) negative film and use sunny
16 (f/16 with the shutter set to the film speed). (Although I find that
actual meter readings usually come out closer to "sunny 8" that sunny 16.)
Otherwise, it depends on your budget. I think that Cosina/Voightlander makes
a reasonably priced (US$100 or so) meter that goes in the flash shoe and
looks quite retro/Leica-like, although it's silver, not black.
The Sekonic Twinmate L-208 claims to fit in a flash shoe, but it really
doesn't, but works fine as a generic handheld meter. I wanted the Gossen
that doesn't require a battery but the store was out so I bought the L-208.
The L-208's pretty cheap, but I really don't see any need to spend any more.
David J. Littleboy
Tokyo, Japan
Chris Ellinger - 23 Apr 2004 16:36 GMT
>> Hi, What can you recommend as a user friendly light meter for a Fuji
>> GW670 11 with 90 ml lens? I especially like Candid street photos.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>that doesn't require a battery but the store was out so I bought the L-208.
>The L-208's pretty cheap, but I really don't see any need to spend any more.
I agree with the L-208. It is pretty sensitive, does reflected and
incident, and is all the meter you need for street photos.
Chris Ellinger
Ann Arbor, MI USA
http://www.ellingerphoto.com
Drew Saunders - 23 Apr 2004 18:56 GMT
> Otherwise, it depends on your budget. I think that Cosina/Voightlander makes
> a reasonably priced (US$100 or so) meter that goes in the flash shoe and
> looks quite retro/Leica-like, although it's silver, not black.
$160 from B&H and they make both silver and black:
<http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&
Q=&sku=191968&is=REG>
and
<http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&
Q=&sku=191967&is=REG>

Signature
Drew W. Saunders
dru (at) stanford (dot) eee dee you
> Hi, What can you recommend as a user friendly light meter for a Fuji
> GW670 11 with 90 ml lens? I especially like Candid street photos.
> thanks.....
> JM
I like both my Sekonic L-208 and my Sverdlovsk-2.
The Sekonic L-208 twinmate is very small (around 2.5"x1.5"x1")
slightly retro-looking analogue meter with both reflected
light and incident modes.
The Sverdlovsk-2 is a little larger and not very pretty, but it
gives readings which agree closely with the Sekonic and it has
a nice viewfinder to help aim the meter. It was also very cheap.
Peter.

Signature
pirwin@ktb.net
> Hi, What can you recommend as a user friendly light meter for a Fuji
> GW670 11 with 90 ml lens? I especially like Candid street photos.
Just use print film, the exposure latitude is wide enough where a good guess
is normally good enough. For candid street photo's a light meter would be
too slow and "un-candid"

Signature
Stacey
UrbanVoyeur - 25 Apr 2004 19:22 GMT
Not true. A light meter for candid street photos is NOT too slow.
I use a Fuji 670 II w/ 90 for street photos all the time. I only shoot slide
(Provia 100 & 400) and I use a handheld meter. Either a Luna Star F or a
Zone 6 modified pentax digital spot.
Preparation is the key. Meter before you need to shoot. Take readings in
shadow & sunlight, and in between. Once you know how the street reads, you
can shoot and adjust as necessary.
I've been shooting in the street this way for years using the zone systems
to place highlights and it has never failed me.

Signature
J
http://www.urbanvoyeur.com
> > Hi, What can you recommend as a user friendly light meter for a Fuji
> > GW670 11 with 90 ml lens? I especially like Candid street photos.
>
> Just use print film, the exposure latitude is wide enough where a good guess
> is normally good enough. For candid street photo's a light meter would be
> too slow and "un-candid"
Stacey - 25 Apr 2004 20:17 GMT
> Preparation is the key. Meter before you need to shoot. Take readings in
> shadow & sunlight, and in between.
Until a cloud rolls in.. :-)
My point was light can change rapidly and being able to guess exposure is a
good thing to know how to do, YMMV and I guess where you live the light
stays constant?!

Signature
Stacey
Lear - 25 Apr 2004 20:28 GMT
I used to have my seconik tied to my belt and in the pocket, you chek
incident light, then every 10 minuts or so just to be sure averything
stays the same. If light change, just meter, takes only about 2 secs.
I find a hand held meter liberating in such situation.
Diego k.
>> Preparation is the key. Meter before you need to shoot. Take readings in
>> shadow & sunlight, and in between.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>good thing to know how to do, YMMV and I guess where you live the light
>stays constant?!
Q.G. de Bakker - 25 Apr 2004 20:36 GMT
> > Preparation is the key. Meter before you need to shoot. Take readings in
> > shadow & sunlight, and in between.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> good thing to know how to do, YMMV and I guess where you live the light
> stays constant?!
Guessing is undoutedly faster than measuring. We have a saying over here
that translates (losing the rhyme) to: measuring equals knowing, guessing
equals missing.
A guess is better than a missed shot, but many guesses lead to unusable
shots anyway... I'd rather not put the results of a photographic outing in
the hands of fickle fortune. It doesn't really take very long to use a light
meter.
Stacey - 26 Apr 2004 01:55 GMT
>> My point was light can change rapidly and being able to guess exposure is
>> a good thing to know how to do,
> A guess is better than a missed shot, but many guesses lead to unusable
> shots anyway...
Can't imagine guessing far enough off with print film for that to happen!
Sure use a meter to get a baseline but once you start shooting on the
street the large exposure latitude of print film should easily cover any
mistakes.

Signature
Stacey
Q.G. de Bakker - 28 Apr 2004 20:03 GMT
> Can't imagine guessing far enough off with print film for that to happen!
> Sure use a meter to get a baseline but once you start shooting on the
> street the large exposure latitude of print film should easily cover any
> mistakes.
Covering mistakes, yes...
;-)