Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Medium format / April 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Best Inexpensive Digital Scanner for MF

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Damon Courtney - 07 Apr 2004 19:56 GMT
Hello all,

   I am looking for advice on the least expensive flatbed scanner I
can get for scanning medium format negatives.  You'll have to forgive
any and all ignorance of the subject, as I am not a photographer or
even a hobbyist.  I am really only looking to do one little project.

   I have medium format negatives (I wish I could tell you the size)
that I need to scan into digital format.  The resulting digital copies
will eventually be printed in no larger than an 8x10 format, and most
of them will fall into the 5x7 range.

   This will probably be the only time in my life that I work with
medium format, so I'm really just looking for the least expensive
solution.  I'm thinking that I don't really need much since I won't be
blowing the pictures up to any great size.  The Epson flatbed Photo
series seems to be a winner, but I just don't know enough about this
to really say which will best suit my needs.

   Can I get away with something as inexpensive as the Epson
Perfection 1670 Photo?  Do I need to buy a special adapter to scan
medium format with this model?  I've seen some people say that you can
put the negative right on the flatbed and just scan that way.  Can you
do this with any scanner?  I don't understand how that works. 0-]

   Any help would be immensely appreciated. 0-]  Please CC me on any
response, as I don't follow this newsgroup.

Thank you,

Damon Courtney
- - 07 Apr 2004 22:15 GMT
Take a look at the Epson 3170.  Amazon has had rebates in the past, so you
might price it there.  The rebate, free shipping and no tax made it a nicely
priced MF scanner that does a decent job.

Doug
Signature

Doug's "MF Film Holder" for batch scanning "strips" of 120/220 medium format
film:
http://home.earthlink.net/~dougfisher/holder/mfholderintro.html

Andrew Price - 07 Apr 2004 22:32 GMT
>Take a look at the Epson 3170.  Amazon has had rebates in the past, so you
>might price it there.  The rebate, free shipping and no tax made it a nicely
>priced MF scanner that does a decent job.

Isn't the transparency hood for the 3170 only designed for 35mm film?
Those that I've seen seem slightly too narrow to accommodate 120
negatives.  In any event, it is considerably narrower than the
aperture of the 3200.
- - 08 Apr 2004 03:39 GMT
The 3170 was designed to handle up to medium format size.  You may be
thinking of the 2400 which looks very similar.  It will only do 35 mm.

Doug
Signature

Doug's "MF Film Holder" for batch scanning "strips" of 120/220 medium format
film:
http://home.earthlink.net/~dougfisher/holder/mfholderintro.html

z-one-b - 08 Apr 2004 04:26 GMT
> Take a look at the Epson 3170.

Is there a site at which full res files can be viewed/downloaded for
evaluation?
eqw
- - 08 Apr 2004 15:18 GMT
This is the only review of the 3170 that I know about:

http://personal.inet.fi/private/luukkanen/3170_review.html

Look at reviews for the 3200 too because the optical system is similar.

Doug
Signature

Doug's "MF Film Holder" for batch scanning "strips" of 120/220 medium format
film:
http://home.earthlink.net/~dougfisher/holder/mfholderintro.html

Peter - 07 Apr 2004 22:57 GMT

>     Can I get away with something as inexpensive as the Epson
> Perfection 1670 Photo?  Do I need to buy a special adapter to scan
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Damon Courtney

You need a scanner with a transparency hood - in other words, a light in
the lid.  These normally don't cover the whole area and should come with
masks to stop stray light getting round the edges and reducing the
contrast.  If they are missing you can always make up something out of
black card.

FWIW I use an Epson 1640 Photo and get good results.  Later models give
better resolution, but you must have a "photo" version.

Peter
Timo Labrenz - 09 Apr 2004 01:30 GMT
peter@somewhere.ie (Peter) schrieb:

> FWIW I use an Epson 1640 Photo and get good results.  Later models
> give better resolution [...]

...only the 1650 doesn't. It doesn't take medium format, only 35mm
slides and negatives.

Timo
Mr 645 - 10 Apr 2004 05:24 GMT
I never had great results from the Epson Perfection series but watch for deals
on the Epson Expression 1680 or 1600
http://www.jonlayephotography.com
McLeod - 11 Apr 2004 16:48 GMT
X-Original-Message-ID:
<memo.20040407225705.2884O@softwell.compulink.co.uk>
X-Agent-Group: rec.photo.equipment.medium-format
X-Agent-Format: 1 1 0 0 1 500000 0 0 1 0 "*" 0
X-Intro: "On Wed, 7 Apr 2004 22:57 +0100 (BST), peter@somewhere.ie
(Peter) wrote:\n"

>>     Can I get away with something as inexpensive as the Epson
>> Perfection 1670 Photo?  Do I need to buy a special adapter to scan
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
>Peter

How do you get the 1640 to recognize medium format film?  I have one
of these and haven't been able to make it scan with medium format
film.  Do you need a special adaptor?
- - 11 Apr 2004 17:56 GMT
> How do you get the 1640 to recognize medium format film?  I have one
> of these and haven't been able to make it scan with medium format
> film.

Some Epson scanners have a limitation built in their software that prevents
you from selecting an area wide enough for MF.  You might download the free
evaluation copy of VueScan or Silverfast SE and see if one of these will
allow you to crop things as you wish.

Doug
Signature

Doug's "MF Film Holder" for batch scanning "strips" of 120/220 medium format
film:
http://home.earthlink.net/~dougfisher/holder/mfholderintro.html

Lassi =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hippel=E4inen?= - 12 Apr 2004 10:40 GMT
> > How do you get the 1640 to recognize medium format film?  I have one
> > of these and haven't been able to make it scan with medium format
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> evaluation copy of VueScan or Silverfast SE and see if one of these will
> allow you to crop things as you wish.

My 1640 didn't have any problems with MF... until I installed a new
version of the driver. After that there were serious problems, because
the new driver was too automatic. It had a built-in assumption that
everybody uses 35mm film, and tried to chop the prescan image to 24x36mm
frames. It worked OK with 35mm, though, and made mass scans faster.

Luckily the driver still has manual controls as an option. Turning off
the automatics helped. There's no substitute for human intelligence.

-- Lassi
Peter - 14 Apr 2004 19:03 GMT
> X-Original-Message-ID:
> <memo.20040407225705.2884O@softwell.compulink.co.uk>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> of these and haven't been able to make it scan with medium format
> film.  Do you need a special adaptor?

Use VueScan :-)

It will scan up to 4x5"

Peter
CorrPro96 - 25 Apr 2004 21:08 GMT
Don't try to get away too cheaply. You will also need good software to correct
your scans. The Epson 3200 Professional model comes with Silverfast Ai and is
probably the cheapest unit for quality scans out there. It will cost you about
$550.00. I use a Microtek Artxscan 120 with Silverfast and I am very happy with
the results I get from 35mm and 120 film.

Rich
Neil Gould - 08 Apr 2004 13:20 GMT
Recently, Damon Courtney <damon@unreality.com> posted:

> Hello all,
>
>     I am looking for advice on the least expensive flatbed scanner I
> can get for scanning medium format negatives.  You'll have to forgive
> any and all ignorance of the subject, as I am not a photographer or
> even a hobbyist.  I am really only looking to do one little project.

How many negatives are you working with, and are they color or b/w? If
they are color, be prepared to learn a lot about color correction; if they
are monochrome, be prepared to learn a lot about managing grain (or to not
be able to get any decent results).

If there are fewer than 100 of these, I'd be tempted to just get the
images printed, as the time and effort involved in scanning them would
hardly be warranted by the results from a low-end scanner. Even flatbed
scans of those prints are likely to be better than what you'd get from
scanning the negatives, and would be adequate for prints on your inkjet at
the sizes you indicate.

Regards,

Neil
????Lonely Boy???? - 08 Apr 2004 15:00 GMT
Epson F3200 scanner - from 135 yo 4X5!

http://www.i-love-epson.co.jp/products/scanner/f3200/f32001.htm

Signature

Please remove NOSPAM when replying!
--
My Underwater Photo Album: http://www.geocities.com/hmlai88/
Have a nice day and eat as much as you can!
===========================================
Lonely Boy
http://www.geocities.com/lonelyb
ICQ: 1176912
----

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.