Photo Forum / Film Photography / Medium format / December 2003
Automatic bounce flash?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
steven.sawyer@banet.net - 20 Dec 2003 22:51 GMT I probably should post this somewhere else, but I'm not quite sure where. I usually use manual flash and just adjust my aperture for the distance as I really don't trust the "automatic" feature on most flash units. I was thinking about bounce flash and was wondering if that "automatic" feature might come in handy there as the whiter and more reflective the ceiling is - the lower output of flash you should get out of an "automatic" unit and vice versa. Is this something that is routinely done?
Mark A - 21 Dec 2003 04:56 GMT > I probably should post this somewhere else, but I'm not quite sure > where. I usually use manual flash and just adjust my aperture for the [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > of an "automatic" unit and vice versa. Is this something that is > routinely done? Many automatic flashes pivot or turn for bounce purposes. The automatic feature works whether used as bounce or straight ahead.
zeitgeist - 21 Dec 2003 06:27 GMT I probably should post this somewhere else, but I'm not quite sure
> where. I usually use manual flash and just adjust my aperture for the > distance as I really don't trust the "automatic" feature on most flash [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > of an "automatic" unit and vice versa. Is this something that is > routinely done? I didn't get my first auto expo flash till the mid 80's, I was in heaven cause I had a choice of 4 f/stops.
Now you can choose an f/stop and the flash will nail it often enough.
I bounce flash alot, usually using side walls for an effect similar to a large light box. use a flash that tilts or swivels and aim it where you want, the sensor eye faces the subject, though these days with TTL you let the camera control the flash.
It works well enough and often enough for digital.
This reply is echoed to the z-prophoto mailing list at yahoogroups.com
steven.sawyer@banet.net - 21 Dec 2003 21:16 GMT OK let me try to elaborate on what I have in mind. If I'm shooting with the flash faced forward (full power) then all I have to do is adjust the aperture to match the distance (of course I'm limited to the aperture range on my camera). However with bounce, off of a ceiling, I can't work like this, since ceiling heights will vary and also the reflectiveness of the ceiling. Therefore if I aimed an "automatic" flash at a ceiling with the automatic sensor also aimed at the ceiling, shouldn't then I get the same amount of illumination at the same horizontal distance from my camera in most ordinary cases? In other words the flash will provide roughly the same amount of light bounced back to the flash unit itself and therefore, within reason, would illuminate my subjects roughly the same as well, meaning that I could retain my method of adjusting aperture to distance.
> I probably should post this somewhere else, but I'm not quite sure > > where. I usually use manual flash and just adjust my aperture for the [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > This reply is echoed to the z-prophoto mailing list at yahoogroups.com Bob Monaghan - 21 Dec 2003 23:20 GMT re: ceiling bounced flash and sensor at ceiling
But you are not photographing the ceiling, you are photographing a subject some distance away, with light bounced off the ceiling. What is important is not how much light bounces off the ceiling, but how much light bounces off the subject. So you aim the strobe light source at the ceiling, to diffuse the light etc., but the sensor at the subject to ensure that enough light is delivered to illuminate the subject for a photo at the given distance and f/stop setting.
Suppose the ceiling is ten feet high, and the subject 40 feet away. If you point at a (white) ceiling only 10 ft away, the sensor is going to see a lot of reflected light and shut off the flashtube fast. But the subject 40 ft away won't get enough light - typically 2 or more stops lost from bouncing off the ceiling, depending on height and color etc. So the subject on film will come out underexposed if you point sensor at ceiling...
hth bobm
 Signature *********************************************************************** * Robert Monaghan POB 752182 Southern Methodist Univ. Dallas Tx 75275 * ********************Standard Disclaimers Apply*************************
steven.sawyer@banet.net - 21 Dec 2003 23:46 GMT But I'm adjusting my aperture for the distance from me (with bounce flash) and the subject? For instance, let's say I test this arrangement with a light meter at 10' and bouncing off a 8' white ceiling, again with automatic flash and with the sensor pointed at the ceiling. My light meter tells me the f-stop and I calculate the guide number. If I continue to use that guide number, to adjust my aperture based on the distance from me to my subject, in the same ceiling/paint combination, I should be OK, within reason. But my point is, will the automatic flash make this the case with a 10' high ceiling, assuming the automatic feature assures me of the same amount of light delivered in most situations, within reason. In other words I'm combining the "automatic" feature with the GN system of exposure. I'm not relying on the flash to measure my light to the subject, I'm doing that myself, I'm just relying on the flash to deliver the same amount of "bounced" light regardless of the ceiling characteristics.
> re: ceiling bounced flash and sensor at ceiling > [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > * Robert Monaghan POB 752182 Southern Methodist Univ. Dallas Tx 75275 * > ********************Standard Disclaimers Apply************************* Bob Monaghan - 22 Dec 2003 00:51 GMT Unless you are shooting on manual mode (for maximum power), then the flash sensor is setup to automatically cutoff the flashtube after it has "seen" a certain amount of light coming back from the subject (e.g., to prevent overexposure from using too much light). So yes, it is the same cutoff point each time. In some auto-strobes (vivitar 283..), different color and density filters are used to provide a series of auto-ranges at different distances...
The problem is that you keep wanting to point the sensor at the ceiling ;-) Doing so will cutoff the flashtube based on the amount of light reflected back from the ceiling, not from the subject. The sensor has to be pointed at the subject to correctly cutoff the flashtube when the amount of light has been received by the lens and sensor, both pointing at the subject.
You don't set the guide number based on light reflected from the white ceiling, but rather on a series of tests with the actual subject. If you have a flashmeter, you can meter at the subject's position and adjust for darker or lighter than average subjects and backgrounds (with experience ;-). Since you seem to be measuring the light from your flash with your "light meter", I am assuming that it is a combo light meter and flashmeter? If so, the owner's manual should have more info on using the flashmeter in it.
the key issue with bouncing off the ceiling is it reduces the maximum range at which you can work, as you lose a stop or two+ in the bounce setup, depending on distance and ceiling color (which can also impact the color of the light reflected to the subject, so purple ceiling may mean purple faces on subjects ;-)
HTH bobm
 Signature *********************************************************************** * Robert Monaghan POB 752182 Southern Methodist Univ. Dallas Tx 75275 * ********************Standard Disclaimers Apply*************************
steven.sawyer@banet.net - 22 Dec 2003 03:25 GMT I suppose I could test this arrangement by just doing it in various situations with my flashmeter (Sekonic L-358). The color issue is very important, the automatic flash sensor is not going to gauge color temperature.
> Unless you are shooting on manual mode (for maximum power), then the flash > sensor is setup to automatically cutoff the flashtube after it has "seen" [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > * Robert Monaghan POB 752182 Southern Methodist Univ. Dallas Tx 75275 * > ********************Standard Disclaimers Apply************************* Sherman - 22 Dec 2003 03:04 GMT > OK let me try to elaborate on what I have in mind. If I'm shooting with the > flash faced forward (full power) then all I have to do is adjust the aperture [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > > > > This reply is echoed to the z-prophoto mailing list at yahoogroups.com The reflectivity of the ceiling is probably very different than that of your subject(s). So your reading won't work at all in most cases. If you are dead set against using automatic mode with the sensor pointed at the subject try taking the guide number of the flash at full power and then using the distance the light travels from flash to ceiling and back to your subject as your distance and set your aperture accordingly then open up at least two or three stops for the light loss of the bounce. That _might_ get you in the ballpark.
Sherman http://www.dunnamphoto.com
steven.sawyer@banet.net - 22 Dec 2003 03:23 GMT It's not that I'm dead set against using the automatic flash feature off of the subject, it's just that I'm using the bounce in conjunction with other flash units aimed at the subject, and those will be at full power. My hunch is that automatic flash is useless if you're using multiple flash units as one unit will pick up the other's flash and cut off early. If the unit is reading off of the ceiling then it will not pick up the output of the other units aimed at the subject. My main concern is maintaining a consistent output to the subject off of the ceiling. I suppose that there are limits to this. Obviously a 40' high ceiling is going to be a problem as well as a sloped ceiling.
> > OK let me try to elaborate on what I have in mind. If I'm shooting with > the [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] > Sherman > http://www.dunnamphoto.com Bob Monaghan - 23 Dec 2003 00:00 GMT probably you should look into the Lighting Cookbook or Fil Hunter and Paul Fuqua, "Light-Science and Magic" (Focal Press, 1990) classic etc.
generally, the main strobe light controls the overall exposure, and fill lights or hair highlights strobes are kept a stop or more below the main light, so the exposure is basically set by the main strobe. In these cases, automatic flash cutoff still works fine for many situations.
when in doubt, you can flash meter the scene and set the required aperture based on film ISO, again something that should be covered in your meter manual for specifics.
if the ceiling is far or colored purple, you can always use a flash diffuser of some sort, ranging from a white card or handkerchief cloth to an inflated commercial diffuser etc. Lots less light loss as well as purer color. finally, you can extend your strobes lighting for $5 or so fresnel from Home Depot, see http://medfmt.8k.com/bronfresnel.html
hth bobm
 Signature *********************************************************************** * Robert Monaghan POB 752182 Southern Methodist Univ. Dallas Tx 75275 * ********************Standard Disclaimers Apply*************************
Nige - 22 Dec 2003 12:53 GMT > OK let me try to elaborate on what I have in mind. If I'm shooting with the > flash faced forward (full power) then all I have to do is adjust the aperture [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > illuminate my subjects roughly the same as well, meaning that I could retain > my method of adjusting aperture to distance. The main problem with your logic is the flash's sensor stays pointed at the subject when you swivel the flash head up/around to bounce (it usually in the part of the flash that doesn't move) so the sensor measures the light reflected from the subject. If your flash doesn't have enough oomph (technical term) then you might get under exposure when bouncing due to the extra distance and loss of light due to the reflective properties of the roof.
Cheers, Nige
steven.sawyer@banet.net - 22 Dec 2003 16:01 GMT Well I could just angle the entire unit toward the ceiling, but I'm looking to get one with a detachable sensor.
> > OK let me try to elaborate on what I have in mind. If I'm shooting with > the [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > Cheers, Nige Neil Gould - 22 Dec 2003 16:40 GMT Recently, steven.sawyer@banet.net <steven.sawyer@banet.net> posted:
> Well I could just angle the entire unit toward the ceiling, but I'm > looking to get one with a detachable sensor. Hmmm. I don't understand what you're trying to accomplish. One wants the light measured off of the subject, not the ceiling. As has been pointed out, you may need a beefy flash unit to be able to illuminate the subject purely by bounce, because the light falls off as the square root of the distance from the subject plus the absorbtion of the reflector (ceiling) and loss from scattered rays that don't reach the subject. In small rooms with bright ceilings and subjects that aren't too far away, this may not be much of an issue, but the power required goes up dramatically as the room size, distance from subject, and reflectivity changes.
Neil
steven.sawyer@banet.net - 22 Dec 2003 20:35 GMT Basically what I'm trying to do is use a bounce as a "manual" flash unit. That is a consistent delivery of light from me to the subject. The bounce will be used in conjunction with other flash units. If I just used it on full power and forgot about the automatic feature, then the amount of light delivered would be dependent on the ceiling height and reflectivity. But if I use the automatic feature to meter what I'm getting back from the ceiling, to the flash unit itself, then I should be able to deliver a consistent amount of light from my position with the camera to the subject. As for the amount reaching the subject, I'll do that work by calculating the aperture using the distance and the Guide Number. I think everyone keeps thinking automatic flash to the subject - I don't want to do this - I'm using the "manual" guide number approach to this. All I want is a consistent output from the bounce regardless of the ceiling (obviously within reason).
> Recently, steven.sawyer@banet.net <steven.sawyer@banet.net> posted: > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Neil Sherman - 23 Dec 2003 04:07 GMT > Basically what I'm trying to do is use a bounce as a "manual" flash unit. > That is a consistent delivery of light from me to the subject. The bounce [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > want is a consistent output from the bounce regardless of the ceiling > (obviously within reason). OK, I think I see what you are driving at here (I can be a little slow but your application is unusual as well).
I have a couple of questions and suggestions if you don't mind. * Is it necessary for the flash to bounce from the ceiling? What I'm asking is if the _angle_ of the light from that particular flash is critical. If the angle isn't critical (and since you are talking about different ceiling heights etc. here I'm thinking it might not be) then- could your requirement be met by using a softbox attachment on the light rather than bouncing it? * If the angle _is_ important then- would it be possible to use a flash extension or even a small light stand to raise the flash above the subject and then bounce it from a white card or reflector attached to the flash head?
Either possibility, softbox or extension/light stand would give you more consistent light than trying to measure the light reflection vs. total distance etc. and you wouldn't have to worry about color balance either.
Just some thoughts. Good luck!
Sherman http://www.dunnamphoto.com
|
|
|