> FWIW, KEH at least will ship internationally. Adorama might, too. There are
> hassles and inconveniences and expenses associated with buying
> internationally, but get those taken care of leisurely and spend your travel
> time travelling instead of shopping.
> Also FWIW, I'd recommend the Mamiya 7 over the Mamiya 6. I found that for
> rectangular images, 6x7 feels a _lot_ larger than 6x6 cropped to a
> rectangle. I know it's only a 70/56 increase, but a 6x7 slide seems enormous
> next to a 645 one on the light box. (Partly this is because making a 13x19
> print from 645 is beginning to be a stretch (for we unrepentant grain
> sniffers) but razor sharp 16x20s from 6x7 are like falling off a log.
> I know this and have ordered from KEH a couple of times as well as
> Adorama. However, that means I would have to pay customs and taxes,
> which would inflate the price about 30%... compared to just getting
> onto the return plane with the camera on my neck :)
I thought you'd say that<g>. For 15% (which is what I thought VAT was), I'd
rather spend that day seeing something NYC (with an already tested camera)
other than the inside of a camera store. But 30% is seriously painful.
>> Also FWIW, I'd recommend the Mamiya 7 over the Mamiya 6.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> projectors
> are readily available at reasonable cost, but 6x7 is another matter...
That's an issue I keep forgetting: I only make prints.
> The Mamiya 7 with 65mm lens might be a workable choice if I only manage to
> buy
> ONE lens.
That's what I ended up doing. I like the 65mm AOV. I got back into MF with a
Fuji GS645, and since then have found normal "normal" lenses to be too
narrow.
> If two, 80+50mm would be neat. If I wanted to shoot panoramas on 35mm,
> then the 43mm would be really nice.. excuse me, I'm going to return my
> lottery
> ticket now.. :)
Yep. This gets into lottery ticket territory quickly.
When I got the M7, it was a toss-up between the GSW690 and the M7. The lack
of interchangeable lenses on the GSW690 put me off, and I got the M7. But
I've never had enough spare change since then to get the 43/4.5, the
availability of which was the reason for choosing the M7.
The embarrassing thing is that I've done this before. Many years ago, I
bought a new Hassy 500C (which means you can compute the value of "many"
here), but never had enough money to buy another lens for it. I had the
stick shift focusing handle and the meter-in-the-knob meter, and dragged
that thing all over the place; from the Green Mountains of Vermont to
Daibosatsutoge, Yatsugatake, and Mt. Fuji.

Signature
David J. Littleboy
Tokyo, Japan
Toni Nikkanen - 25 Jul 2008 09:33 GMT
> I thought you'd say that<g>. For 15% (which is what I thought VAT was), I'd
> rather spend that day seeing something NYC (with an already tested camera)
> other than the inside of a camera store. But 30% is seriously painful.
Our VAT is 22%, customs tax is something in the order of 3-5%, and
shipping charges are also included.. the formula is something like:
(price + shipping)*1.05*1.22, making 1.3 a very good approximation..
I ended up buying a Mamiya 7 + 65mm from Japan, the price was slightly
cheaper than in Adorama, but I'll be paying a lot more because of
customs and taxes. The good thing is it'll maybe arrive at the
beginning of next week and I'll have some time to test it before I
leave. In the worst case, it'll arrive while I'm already in USA, in
which case I'll take my eminently usable but heavy Pentax 645 system
with me and get aching shoulders (again) :)
> That's an issue I keep forgetting: I only make prints.
Me too, but sometimes I fantasize about wonderful, magnificent projected
slides on my living room wall. Well, no 6x6 slides this time, either...
> Yep. This gets into lottery ticket territory quickly.
I returned the ticket, so tomorrow evening we'll see about buying some
additional lenses - and whether I have to go back to work after vacation ;)
> When I got the M7, it was a toss-up between the GSW690 and the M7. The lack
> of interchangeable lenses on the GSW690 put me off, and I got the M7. But
> I've never had enough spare change since then to get the 43/4.5, the
> availability of which was the reason for choosing the M7.
I've been considering the Fuji GS/GSW 670/690's as well.. but I guess I've
made up my mind now.
> The embarrassing thing is that I've done this before. Many years ago, I
> bought a new Hassy 500C (which means you can compute the value of "many"
> here), but never had enough money to buy another lens for it. I had the
> stick shift focusing handle and the meter-in-the-knob meter, and dragged
> that thing all over the place; from the Green Mountains of Vermont to
> Daibosatsutoge, Yatsugatake, and Mt. Fuji.
Even that isn't going to break one's neck like a loaded Pentax 645 kit :)
It's funny that nowadays if you want a quality camera with a
waist-level finder and Carl Zeiss Planar 80mm optics, a Hasselblad 500
C/M kit will cost less than a Rolleiflex, perhaps even significantly
so. I wonder what those cost when they were sold new?
Andrew Price - 26 Jul 2008 00:15 GMT
>> That's an issue I keep forgetting: I only make prints.
>
>Me too, but sometimes I fantasize about wonderful, magnificent projected
>slides on my living room wall. Well, no 6x6 slides this time, either...
If only 6x7 projectors were not so hideously expensive ...
Alan Browne - 11 Aug 2008 23:28 GMT
>>> That's an issue I keep forgetting: I only make prints.
>> Me too, but sometimes I fantasize about wonderful, magnificent projected
>> slides on my living room wall. Well, no 6x6 slides this time, either...
>
> If only 6x7 projectors were not so hideously expensive ...
sigh. Yes.

Signature
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
-- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out.
>> FWIW, KEH at least will ship internationally. Adorama might, too. There are
>> hassles and inconveniences and expenses associated with buying
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> then the 43mm would be really nice.. excuse me, I'm going to return my lottery
> ticket now.. :)
I have the 80mm and 50mm, but I'm thinking about selling them and
picking up a 65mm instead, and maybe buying the 150mm at a later date.
Greg

Signature
Support the Lo Desert Proto Sites:
http://lodesertprotosites.org
Toni Nikkanen - 25 Jul 2008 21:24 GMT
> I have the 80mm and 50mm, but I'm thinking about selling them and
> picking up a 65mm instead, and maybe buying the 150mm at a later date.
The 150mm would be a nice portrait lens if not for the minimum focusing
distance, so I don't exactly know what I would do with it...
It seems the 65mm is a real winner as everyone is keen on getting it. I guess
I made a good choice then :)
Toni Nikkanen - 29 Jul 2008 17:47 GMT
Got the camera already, shot one roll of Velvia 50 and had it
developed. It is awesome and I am happy with my choice.