Flektogon 50 vs Mir 45 for P-6

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Bogdan Karasek - 29 Apr 2008 18:37 GMT

Hi all,

Has anybody done a comparison of these two lenses? How do they compare?
Is one better than the other?

Any positive and/or negative comments welcome.

Cheers,
Bogdan

Signature

________________________________________________________________
Bogdan Karasek
Montréal, Québec bogdan(at)bogdanphoto.com
Canada www.bogdanphoto.com

"I bear witness"
________________________________________________________________

Reply to this Message

Ralf R. Radermacher - 29 Apr 2008 18:53 GMT

> Has anybody done a comparison of these two lenses? How do they compare?
> Is one better than the other?

I've had them both and I've sold the Mir. Single-coated, rotten contrast
and a nasty barrel distortion. Plus the usual clunky mechanics of all
Arsenal lenses, well probably with the sole exception of the 35 mm.

Definitely no fun. Still happy with the Flektogon though.

Ralf

Signature

Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo galleries - updated Jan. 10, 2005
Contarex - Kiev 60 - Horizon 202 - P6 mount lenses

Reply to this Message