 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / Film Photography / Medium format / November 2006I'M GOING DIGITAL!
Yes I am! No I'm not. Yes I am! No I'm not. Yes I am! No I'm not. Yes I am! No I'm not. Yes I am! No I'm not. Does bipolar count as digital? Yes? No? > Yes I am! > No I'm not. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Does bipolar count as digital? Yes? No? So sad. One of those freaky, tragic accidents. > Yes I am! > No I'm not. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Does bipolar count as digital? Yes? No? Bipolar is normally analog, looks like you bias is off and you have broken into parasitic oscillations. Scott >> Yes I am! >> No I'm not. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Bipolar is normally analog, looks like you bias is off and you have > broken into parasitic oscillations. That was exactly how I reacted to the grapefruit grape seed distinction. Sheesh. I am blind, not illiterate. I left that part alone although I wanted like hell to nail someone on it. Not worth my time though Grapeseed has been known as an antioxidant for a long time. It is not the best antioxidant, but it is ok. I prefer to get my grapeseed in a glass of red wine. Has the exact impact. Ask any French guy > Yes I am! > No I'm not. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Does bipolar count as digital? Yes? No? I usually shoot with my digital camera. (Nikon d70s) I love the immediate feedback I get from seeing the picture after it is taken. I think I can tell everyone whoever goes to digital, do not, do not, do not delete images until you get home. You would be surprised how good/different the images will look on the computer. The screen on the back of the camera does not do images justice. I cannot tell you how many pictures I almost deleted b/c I thought they did not work and feel in love with them when I got home. Think about film, how many pictures have you loved and hated the next day? Or even minute. > > Yes I am! > > No I'm not. [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > in love with them when I got home. Think about film, how many > pictures have you loved and hated the next day? Or even minute. There should be a warning message on each digital camera body: DO NOT DELETE IMAGES! NEVER! The problem is that when having memory card instead of a film you take more photos than with an analogue, isn't it? I'll stay with 12 non-eraseable frames on 120 film... Cheers, Maciej >> > Yes I am! >> > No I'm not. [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] >There should be a warning message on each digital camera body: >DO NOT DELETE IMAGES! NEVER! November 27, 2006, from Lloyd Erlick, I agree, but for an additional reason (although the reasons above are valid for me, too). I have a file of negatives dating from the sixties. I'm basically a pack-rat, and hardly any negatives have escaped me. Now that I'm an incipient old-fart, I can look back with fresh perception. People change as time goes on, so our relation with our own work changes. Often when I look over old work I see pictures I never saw before. Sometimes I think my past self was not capable of seeing the best ones. Throwing away pictures before we have a chance to examine them over the years is a waste of a precious personal resource. Just by holding our own work we can know both the work and ourselves better. In particular, digital (or digitized ...) pictures are great because of that wonderful slideshow function. I like to have work I'm editing playing on the screen when I'm doing other things because it's practically subliminal ... (and, as an aside, as I discovered last night, my own work playing on the screen is a great antidote to the Borat movie; my mind's eye needed a shower and shave after that one ...). >The problem is that when having memory card instead of a film you take >more photos than with an analogue, isn't it? > >I'll stay with 12 non-eraseable frames on 120 film... Me too! regards, --le ________________________________ Lloyd Erlick Portraits, Toronto. website: www.heylloyd.com telephone: 416-686-0326 email: portrait@heylloyd.com ________________________________  Signature>Cheers, >Maciej In article <18qlm2ltncnb7leb8n6p0fdgenhjkqujb1@4ax.com>, Lloyd Erlick <Lloyd at @the-wire. dot com> wrote: > November 27, 2006, from Lloyd Erlick, > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > any negatives have escaped me. Now that I'm > an incipient old-fart, Gees you must be at least 50 :) >I can look back with > fresh perception. People change as time goes > on, Yes fungus and hair grows in strange places. >so our relation with our own work > changes. After you alienate all your friends and relative your stuck looking at old pictures. > Often when I look over old work I > see pictures I never saw before. Sometimes I > think my past self was not capable of seeing > the best ones. Male or female? > Throwing away pictures before we have a > chance to examine them over the years is a > waste of a precious personal resource. Just > by holding our own work we can know both the > work and ourselves better. How much of a klutz I was. > In particular, digital (or digitized ...) > pictures are great because of that wonderful [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > email: portrait@heylloyd.com > ________________________________ Signature"As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron." - H. L. Mencken, in the Baltimore Sun, July 26, 1920. Reality-Is finding that perfect picture and never looking back. www.gregblankphoto.com Lloyd Erlick wrote:> On 26 Nov 2006 09:53:19 -0800, > I have a file of negatives dating from the > sixties. I'm basically a pack-rat, and hardly > any negatives have escaped me. Now that I'm > an incipient old-fart, I can look back with > fresh perception. I am the same. Significance of some of our photographs back then tell us that we were doing the right thing by making them, even if we were unsure at the time. I am happy that you made such. Post them somewhere so that we may join you. == another Olde Pharte j yazdi: > Yes I am! > No I'm not. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Does bipolar count as digital? Yes? No? Welcome to the Psychiatric Hotline. If you are obsessive-compulsive, please press 1 repeatedly. If you are co-dependent, please ask someone to press 2. If you have multiple personalities, please press 3, 4, 5 and 6. If you are paranoid-delusional, we know who you are and what you want. Just stay on the line until we can trace the call. If you are schizophrenic, listen carefully and a little voice will tell you which number to press. If you are manic-depressive, it doesn't matter which number you press. No one will answer. ;-) Duncan > j yazdi: >> Yes I am! [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >> >> Does bipolar count as digital? Yes? No? j schrieb: > Yes I am! You're on the way to hell... Digital is bad! Andreas SignatureFotos unter http://www.gugau-foto.de/ Schottland unter http://www.whisky-guide.de/ > Yes I am! > No I'm not. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Does bipolar count as digital? Yes? No? I'll let you pick between 10 options. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.