Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Medium format / September 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

How much do I lose by forgetting to rewind?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mxsmanic - 27 Sep 2003 01:51 GMT
If I forget to rewind an A12 back before opening it, about how many
frames can I expect to lose?  I'd guess not more than two ... right?

Also, if I do this, how do I get the back to let me turn the crank until
the film is rewound (since it seems to reset and assume that putting the
insert back in means that you are loading a fresh roll)?  In my case I
ran through twelve "exposures" just to advance the film, then took it
out again.

Signature

Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.

Fred Leif - 27 Sep 2003 04:13 GMT
Hmmm, the A12 back doesn't require 'rewinding'... what you are doing is
finishing moving the film and paper on to the take-up reel.  I'd guess
you're about right with two frames exposed to light..  Once you reinsert the
insert and lock it in the A12 back, you should be able to wind it until you
feel a reduced tension.  Then take it out as usual.

When you take it out, the counter resets again and is ready to be loaded
with a fresh roll - after moving the spool to the 'take up' position, of
course.

> If I forget to rewind an A12 back before opening it, about how many
> frames can I expect to lose?  I'd guess not more than two ... right?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> ran through twelve "exposures" just to advance the film, then took it
> out again.
Mxsmanic - 27 Sep 2003 11:36 GMT
> Hmmm, the A12 back doesn't require 'rewinding'... what you are doing is
> finishing moving the film and paper on to the take-up reel.

Well, you know what I mean.  When I removed the insert I saw the tail
end of the emulsion still only about half way across the film plate, and
I knew I had forgotten to wind up the film on the take-up reel.

> I'd guess you're about right with two frames exposed to light..
> Once you reinsert the insert and lock it in the A12 back, you
> should be able to wind it until you feel a reduced tension.
> Then take it out as usual.

I tried that, but apparently taking out the insert resets something, and
when I put it back in, I could only wind it a certain distance, then it
stopped--as it does when positioning a fresh roll to the first exposure.

In my confusion it did not occur to me that I could simply wind the
remaining film manually onto the take-up spool.

Signature

Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.

J Stafford - 27 Sep 2003 15:26 GMT
> [...]

Hey Genius!  Read the friggin manual.  You don't need a college degree for that.
Mxsmanic - 27 Sep 2003 21:24 GMT
> Hey Genius!  Read the friggin manual.  You don't need
> a college degree for that.

The manual doesn't contain a procedure for the mistake I made, as far as
I know.

Signature

Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.

Stacey - 28 Sep 2003 01:14 GMT
>> [...]
>
> Hey Genius!  Read the friggin manual.  You don't need a college degree for
> that.

Pathetic....
Signature


 Stacey

J Stafford - 28 Sep 2003 01:18 GMT
> >> [...]
> >
> > Hey Genius!  Read the friggin manual.  You don't need a college degree for
> > that.
>
> Pathetic....

You have some kind of agenda? Speak up.
Mxsmanic - 28 Sep 2003 05:36 GMT
> You have some kind of agenda? Speak up.

Oo-wee-oo!

Signature

Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.

Stacey - 28 Sep 2003 19:28 GMT
>> >> [...]
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> You have some kind of agenda? Speak up.

You seem to... He asked a simple question (does the manual explain how many
frames are lost or how to deal with this user mistake?) and you THROW this
college degree stuff back into it.

Signature


 Stacey

J Stafford - 28 Sep 2003 19:49 GMT
>  
> > You have some kind of agenda? Speak up.
>
> You seem to... He asked a simple question (does the manual explain how many
> frames are lost or how to deal with this user mistake?) and you THROW this
> college degree stuff back into it.

Oh that. Yeah, I was crossing subjects. Mixmaster's trolling got me.
Stacey - 28 Sep 2003 20:03 GMT
>>  
>> > You have some kind of agenda? Speak up.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Oh that. Yeah, I was crossing subjects. Mixmaster's trolling got me.

Oh I don't think he's trolling, it's just there is zero point in argueing
with him if you =think= you are going to change his mind. Don't need a
college degree to figure that one out.  :-)
Signature


 Stacey

Stacey - 27 Sep 2003 04:20 GMT
> If I forget to rewind an A12 back before opening it, about how many
> frames can I expect to lose?  I'd guess not more than two ... right?

Sounds about right. I opened the back on my pentacon once after I wound off
the last frame without winding the roll off and lightly fogged the edges of
the last two frames. Some of it was still useable..

> Also, if I do this, how do I get the back to let me turn the crank until
> the film is rewound (since it seems to reset and assume that putting the
> insert back in means that you are loading a fresh roll)?  

By the time you wind it to the 1st frame, it should all be on the takeup
spool.

Signature


 Stacey

Q.G. de Bakker - 27 Sep 2003 08:16 GMT
> > Also, if I do this, how do I get the back to let me turn the crank until
> > the film is rewound (since it seems to reset and assume that putting the
> > insert back in means that you are loading a fresh roll)?
>
> By the time you wind it to the 1st frame, it should all be on the takeup
> spool.

And should the back block before, why not open it again? There's no need to
be afraid that fogged parts will be "overfogged".
Mxsmanic - 27 Sep 2003 11:37 GMT
> And should the back block before, why not open it again? There's no need to
> be afraid that fogged parts will be "overfogged".

It has occurred to me that I could just wind it by hand on the insert.
I don't know that putting the insert back into the film back would
really offer much additional protection by that point.

Signature

Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.

Andrew Price - 27 Sep 2003 20:53 GMT
>Sounds about right. I opened the back on my pentacon once after I wound off
>the last frame without winding the roll off and lightly fogged the edges of
>the last two frames. Some of it was still useable..

Subsidiary question, Stacey:  how many winding movements do you find
you need after exposing the last shot, to ensure that the film is
fully wound onto to the take-up spool:

- for your P6

and

- for your K60?

In both instances, I've never been game to wind less than 7/8 times,
but I have the feeling that this may be excessive.
Stacey - 28 Sep 2003 01:12 GMT
>>Sounds about right. I opened the back on my pentacon once after I wound
>>off the last frame without winding the roll off and lightly fogged the
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> In both instances, I've never been game to wind less than 7/8 times,
> but I have the feeling that this may be excessive.

Never counted. It's ussually pretty easy to feel when it gets easier which
means it's wound onto the takeup spool.
Signature


 Stacey

nathantw - 27 Sep 2003 17:05 GMT
You lose about 2 or 3 frames.

> If I forget to rewind an A12 back before opening it, about how many
> frames can I expect to lose?  I'd guess not more than two ... right?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> ran through twelve "exposures" just to advance the film, then took it
> out again.
Mxsmanic - 27 Sep 2003 21:24 GMT
> You lose about 2 or 3 frames.

I figured two at most.  Three is 25% of the roll, which doesn't make me
happy (that's about €6-€7 shot).  Thanks for the info, though.  I guess
I'll find out when I develop it.

Signature

Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.

Fine Art Photographer - 27 Sep 2003 23:48 GMT
From: Mxsmanic

Apparently this kinda shook you up a little when you saw the film was not wound
all the way onto the take up spool.

On thing that you can do, and not have to remember any thing technical at all.
Is to remount the back onto your camera, pull the darkslide, put the lens cap
on the lens, trip the shutter, wind, trip, wind, trip.  This will will finish
winding the film onto the take up spool.  And is simple to remember.  (:>)

Of course the best solution to this is remember to wind the film all the way
immediately after the last photo.  But We are all human, and make mistakes.  

Hope this helps.

Lauvone
www.lauvone.com
Mxsmanic - 28 Sep 2003 05:37 GMT
> Apparently this kinda shook you up a little when you saw the film was not wound
> all the way onto the take up spool.

It does send an icy chill down the spine, the intensity of which varies
with the value of the shots on that roll.

> On thing that you can do, and not have to remember any thing technical at all.
> Is to remount the back onto your camera, pull the darkslide, put the lens cap
> on the lens, trip the shutter, wind, trip, wind, trip.  This will will finish
> winding the film onto the take up spool.  And is simple to remember.  (:>)

Hmm ... not a bad idea.  I did not have the presence of mind to think of
that at the time.

Signature

Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.

J Stafford - 28 Sep 2003 16:23 GMT
> > Apparently this kinda shook you up a little when you saw the film was not wound
> > all the way onto the take up spool.
>
> It does send an icy chill down the spine, the intensity of which varies
> with the value of the shots on that roll.

Rexlax. The chances that you had anything at all worthwhile on that roll
are almost nil.
Mxsmanic - 28 Sep 2003 16:58 GMT
> Rexlax. The chances that you had anything at all worthwhile on that roll
> are almost nil.

It was not a critical roll, but there are obviously shots I'd like to
see, anyway.  Each exposure costs about €2 in film and development, and
far more than that in time.

Signature

Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.

Q.G. de Bakker - 27 Sep 2003 23:59 GMT
> I figured two at most.  Three is 25% of the roll, which doesn't make me
> happy (that's about ?6-?7 shot).  Thanks for the info, though.  I guess
> I'll find out when I develop it.

Please let us know when you have.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.