Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Medium format / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

How many meters of Rolleiflex TLR still in good condition?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Steven Woody - 06 Jul 2006 17:30 GMT
i just bought a Rolleiflex 3.5e serveral days before, and i found the
meter is totally unusable.  it's not a lineral offset compared with
another good meter ( a in-camera meter of a Contax SLR ),  it offsets 1
to 4 ( even more ) EVs in some different lighting conditions.

i know this is a camera ages one half a century, but i just wanna know
whether this is a common case.  if not, i think i can not accept the
price -- about $600.

BTW: i also found there is no depth of field scale on the camera, is it
normal?

thank you very much.

-
woody
dadiOH - 06 Jul 2006 23:00 GMT
> i just bought a Rolleiflex 3.5e serveral days before, and i found the
> meter is totally unusable.  it's not a lineral offset compared with
> another good meter ( a in-camera meter of a Contax SLR ),  it offsets
> 1 to 4 ( even more ) EVs in some different lighting conditions.

Never had one with a meter (didn't want it) but they never had a sterling
reputation.  Shouldn't be a real big deal to fix if you just have to have
it.
________________

> i know this is a camera ages one half a century, but i just wanna know
> whether this is a common case.  if not, i think i can not accept the
> price -- about $600.

Kinda pricey IMO
___________

> BTW: i also found there is no depth of field scale on the camera, is
> it normal?

It is normally on the focusing knob
http://johnsrolleionlypage.homestead.com/Page_16_resize.jpg

Signature

dadiOH
____________________________

dadiOH's dandies v3.06...
...a help file of info about MP3s, recording from
LP/cassette and tips & tricks on this and that.
Get it at http://mysite.verizon.net/xico

Steven Woody - 07 Jul 2006 02:39 GMT
> > i just bought a Rolleiflex 3.5e serveral days before, and i found the
> > meter is totally unusable.  it's not a lineral offset compared with
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> It is normally on the focusing knob
> http://johnsrolleionlypage.homestead.com/Page_16_resize.jpg

dadiOH,

i need the picture, can you email to me ( narkewoody at gmail dot com
)? the url can not be open here. thank you!
One4All - 07 Jul 2006 04:28 GMT
> i just bought a Rolleiflex 3.5e serveral days before, and i found the
> meter is totally unusable.

That's your first mistake. Why didn't you check this feature out before
you bought it?

> > i know this is a camera ages one half a century

An incomprehensible statement.

> i think i can not accept the price -- about $600.

You have to accept the price: You bought it!

> BTW: i also found there is no depth of field scale on the camera, is it
> normal?

Go on eBay & buy a manual. The DOF scale is on the focusing knob.
Rolleiflexes are great MF cameras. In their prime in the late '50's &
early '60's, they were the camera of choice of photojournalists before
35-mm took over. You do have a Zeiss lens, you know.

You may be able to get the meter problem repaired. Check out:

<midwestcamerarepair.com>

All success with your Rollei!
Steven Woody - 07 Jul 2006 09:53 GMT
> > i just bought a Rolleiflex 3.5e serveral days before, and i found the
> > meter is totally unusable.
>
> That's your first mistake. Why didn't you check this feature out before
> you bought it?

because it's a internal deal, i bought it on the net :-)  the seller
told me that the meter is workable.

> > > i know this is a camera ages one half a century
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> You have to accept the price: You bought it!

i get 7 days to test the camera, if i don't satisfy with it, the seller
promised that i can return it to him.

> > BTW: i also found there is no depth of field scale on the camera, is it
> > normal?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> early '60's, they were the camera of choice of photojournalists before
> 35-mm took over. You do have a Zeiss lens, you know.

i've already download manuals of 3.5F and 3.5 MX-EVS on the net.  i do
know where the DOF scales locate for these models.  i just uncertain
that if there is an exception the the 3.5E.

if you tell me the 3.5E also gets a DOF scale, so i can make sure that
the scale was teared off from the body.

> You may be able to get the meter problem repaired. Check out:
>
> <midwestcamerarepair.com>

thank you.  but ... i am in china :-(

> All success with your Rollei!
Neil Gould - 07 Jul 2006 11:36 GMT
Hello Steven,

Recently, Steven Woody <narkewoody@gmail.com> posted:

>>> i just bought a Rolleiflex 3.5e serveral days before, and i found
>>> the meter is totally unusable.

Have you looked at this site? Sui Fai is a knowkledgable user of Rollei
cameras, and may be able to help you assess your particular model. Here is
his page on the 3.5f model 1:

http://www.siufai.dds.nl/Rolleiflex35F.htm

Neil
Steven Woody - 07 Jul 2006 17:42 GMT
> Hello Steven,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> http://www.siufai.dds.nl/Rolleiflex35F.htm

thank you for the info.  i've already visited the site. and, by far i
have not decided to write an email to disturb anyone. thank you anyway.
Peter Irwin - 07 Jul 2006 14:01 GMT
> if you tell me the 3.5E also gets a DOF scale, so i can make sure that
> the scale was teared off from the body.

Some Rolleiflexes have a white bar on the focussing knob which
changes length when you change aperture on the camera.
Try looking at he focussing knob when chaging the aperture.
It should be obvious then.

Peter.
Signature

pirwin@ktb.net

Steven Woody - 07 Jul 2006 17:38 GMT
> > if you tell me the 3.5E also gets a DOF scale, so i can make sure that
> > the scale was teared off from the body.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Try looking at he focussing knob when chaging the aperture.
> It should be obvious then.

yes! thank you. i noticed the white bar, same as that in 3.5f manual.
but the bar never change its length in spit of how i change the
apperture.

how can i repair it ?  and, how often you guy use the DOF scale?

-
woody
Peter Irwin - 07 Jul 2006 18:49 GMT
> yes! thank you. i noticed the white bar, same as that in 3.5f manual.
> but the bar never change its length in spit of how i change the
> apperture.

It sounds as if there are two things wrong with your camera,
the meter and the DOF scale. If you have not already put a roll
of film through it, I would do so right now. If there is
a place near you that does 120 E6 on a same day basis, I'd
shoot a roll of E6, otherwise shoot B&W negatives.

Neither meter nor DOF scale are in any way essential, so if
everything else is OK it should be usable. Since you have
a return privilege, I'd be inclined to see if you could
renegotiate the price based on the fact that certain features
don't work properly.

These cameras are in no way rare and the price you paid
seems in line with BGN grade from KEH, and BGN grade
from KEH is usually reported as pretty good and working
properly.

Peter.
Signature

pirwin@ktb.net

Steven Woody - 09 Jul 2006 17:41 GMT
thank you for all your input.

-
woody
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.