Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Medium format / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Kiev vs ______ lens testing.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Stacey - 21 Feb 2005 07:07 GMT
http://kievaholic.com/lenstests2.html

Done with a kodak digital back testing various kiev, bronica and 'blad
lenses. This shows why some people like the mir 45 and others don't!  :-)
Also interesting to me how the 55mm shift Arsat compares to the 50mm
Distagon, I knew the 55mm Arsat and the 60mm curtagon were both good
lenses. The 150mm Tele-xenar looks good as well.

He covers 30mm to 500mm lenses in the test.
Signature


 Stacey

Thom - 21 Feb 2005 10:48 GMT
>http://kievaholic.com/lenstests2.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>He covers 30mm to 500mm lenses in the test.

Thanks for that, is there a similar site for the 35mm cameras like the
FEDS and Zorkies with Industars and Jupiters??

THOM
McLeod - 21 Feb 2005 20:20 GMT
>http://kievaholic.com/lenstests2.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>He covers 30mm to 500mm lenses in the test.

It confirms my personal experiences with the 50mm  
Hasselblad lens as well.  Sharp as a tack in the center but very poor
at the edges, where my Bronica wide angles are much the same
throughout-which isn't great.
Bandicoot - 22 Feb 2005 01:45 GMT
> http://kievaholic.com/lenstests2.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> He covers 30mm to 500mm lenses in the test.

Very interesting, thanks.  The edge performance of the 60mm
Curtagon, in particular, is spectacular.

In this group, at least, the variation between lenses is  _much_  greater
than the sample variation between multiple samples of the same lens,
when he had more than one to test - contrary to the oft repeated
'conventional wisdom'.

Peter
Lassi Hippeläinen - 23 Feb 2005 11:23 GMT
Bandicoot kirjoitti:

>>http://kievaholic.com/lenstests2.html
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Very interesting, thanks.  The edge performance of the 60mm
> Curtagon, in particular, is spectacular.

Unfortunately you can't see the edge performance from that test. If the
6x6 image is taken to be 56x56mm, the circle of sharpness is about 80mm
in diameter, and the corners are 40mm from the centre. That test reaches
only about 28mm from the centre. The equivalent of a 4x4 superslide :-(

Rotating the detector won't help, it should be shifted to the corner.

-- Lassi
Stacey - 24 Feb 2005 00:17 GMT
> Bandicoot kirjoitti:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Unfortunately you can't see the edge performance from that test.

Why not? You can't see the corner performance but you CAN see the edge
performance.

Signature


 Stacey

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.