Can't decide if the RB67 50mm is for me, and if so, older model or only new.
I've read strong reviews both raving and trashing the lens (blad owners
trashing). There is no dealer near me that would rent me one for a day let
alone stock one. I'm want to find out more about the lens before I commit
$.
Has anyone seen galleries online where the photographer used this lens?
thanks, Ivan
> Can't decide if the RB67 50mm is for me, and if so, older model or only new.
> I've read strong reviews both raving and trashing the lens (blad owners
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Has anyone seen galleries online where the photographer used this lens?
> thanks, Ivan
I seriously doubt that you can judge the quality of a 6x7-optic on a standard
computer screen.
I own a 50mm for the RB (Sekor C with FLE), a 50mm for the Mamiya 6 and a 43mm
for the Mamiya 7. The RB lens is clearly weaker than the other two lenses...
but this isn't astonishing, the Mamiya rangefinders have the best optics
money can buy, and this is like saying Rolls Royce is better than Mercedes.
Compared to a SL66 4/50 Zeiss Distagon, the Mamiya lens is better. I have a
100x120cm enlargement from a Delta 100 negative made with the 50mm RB lens
here on my office wall, and you can easily see tiny details (<1mm in the enlargement).
Ok, the extreme edges are going softer, but from 40cm distance this isn't
noticeable and this expected from a retrofocus lens.
All in all, an excellent lens, buy it.
Martin
Ivan - 26 Aug 2004 12:37 GMT
> > Can't decide if the RB67 50mm is for me, and if so, older model or only new.
> > I've read strong reviews both raving and trashing the lens (blad owners
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Martin
Thank you for that encouragement Martin, and the information. I know there
are other places besides e-bay to scout for this lens, but I'm having
trouble with ebay sellers that don't know or won't say if the 50 they have
for sale is a floating lens element. I understand there is a point of
production where they started making the lens with FLE.
thanks again, Ivan
>Can't decide if the RB67 50mm is for me, and if so, older model or only new.
>I've read strong reviews both raving and trashing the lens (blad owners
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Has anyone seen galleries online where the photographer used this lens?
>thanks, Ivan
I have the 50mmm and its sharp as a tack, however I am using it less
and less and using my old Super-23 more because of the format. The RB
is not a true IDEAL FORMAT of 4x5 proportions, its a bit squarer. I
fond myself using the 645 back more to same film and I also picked up
a Rollie SL66E (complete kit) for %28 at an estate auction but its
jammed. When its fixed I'll be using it alot more.
THOM
Ivan - 27 Aug 2004 05:37 GMT
> >Can't decide if the RB67 50mm is for me, and if so, older model or only new.
> >I've read strong reviews both raving and trashing the lens (blad owners
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> THOM
Thanks THOM, that's great to hear! Do you know how old your RB50 would be?
I'm trying to get a grasp if it's the older ones that are a problem or NOT.
thanks again for your response.
Ivan