Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Medium format / June 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Rolleicords?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Matt McGrattan - 27 Jun 2004 11:18 GMT
Hi,

I've been using a couple of medium format cameras for a little bit - a
Lubitel 1 and a Fuji rangefinder (GS645)...

I've been finding myself using the Lubitel a lot (even though it's
ostensibly a much poorer camera than the Fuji) because I like the TLR
layout and viewfinder and also because I like the 6x6 square shots.

Anyway, at some point soon I'd like to pick up a better 6x6 TLR and
I've spotted a few Rolleicords around for low prices on eBay. Often
fairly basic models with Triotars can be had cheaply...

Are these any good? Am I likely to see a significant improvement from
the Lubitel?

What would be a reasonable price for one (either in UKP or US $)?

Thanks,

Matt
Photodad2 - 27 Jun 2004 11:34 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Matt

I am not familiar with the Lubitel, but I use a Rolleicord III (c. 1953).
It has been a great camera for me.  How many 50+ year old cameras do you
know that still work flawlessly?

One of my biggest photographic regrets is that I sold my Rolleicord Vb years
ago when I got out of the wedding business.  It was an incredible camera,
with a sharper lens than my III, interchangeable hoods, and other
improvements that made it much easier to use.

If you can afford the $200-$300 dollars (US) that a Vb costs, that's your
best bet.  But you can get a III like mine for less than $100 US, and it's a
good camera also.

Walt
Martin Francis - 27 Jun 2004 12:09 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> What would be a reasonable price for one (either in UKP or US $)?

I only used a Rolleicord once, and that was to test it before I gave it to
someone as a gift. The negs were rather sharp, though falloff seemed
apparent at wider apertures.

I bought it (a rather old, tatty one- 1930s, perhaps) for the princely sum
of ?30 from a local camera seller.

Signature

Martin Francis  http://www.sixbysix.co.uk
"Go not to Usenet for counsel, for it will say both no, and yes, and
no, and yes...."

David J. Littleboy - 27 Jun 2004 12:11 GMT
> Anyway, at some point soon I'd like to pick up a better 6x6 TLR and
> I've spotted a few Rolleicords around for low prices on eBay. Often
> fairly basic models with Triotars can be had cheaply...
>
> Are these any good? Am I likely to see a significant improvement from
> the Lubitel?

I'd recommend holding out for a real Rolleiflex. Check out the bargain grade
'flexes at KEH.

http://www.keh.com/hmpg/index.cfm

That 2.8D Xenotar looks real nice...

David J. Littleboy
Tokyo, Japan
Stacey - 27 Jun 2004 19:13 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I've spotted a few Rolleicords around for low prices on eBay. Often
> fairly basic models with Triotars can be had cheaply...

I'd step up to at least a tessar/xenar model. Also the early ones had
uncoated lenses which need care to use without getting flare problems. I
have a cord V with a coated xenar lens and it's nice. The other problem
with those old rolleis is they have an extra dim focus screen which is all
but unuseable IMHO. I upgraded mine with a Maxwell screen but they aren't
cheap. For the price of a good screen installed into a cord, you can buy a
minoltacord which already has a brighter screen and a lens that is just as
good.

Signature


 Stacey

Lassi =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hippel=E4inen?= - 29 Jun 2004 22:22 GMT
>... The other problem
> with those old rolleis is they have an extra dim focus screen which is all
> but unuseable IMHO. I upgraded mine with a Maxwell screen but they aren't
> cheap. For the price of a good screen installed into a cord, you can buy a
> minoltacord which already has a brighter screen and a lens that is just as
> good.

A few days ago I was lucky enough to get a Rolleigrid to my old 'flex.
It's only a slab of plastic, but still the effect is pretty stunning.

-- Lassi
Stacey - 30 Jun 2004 01:26 GMT
Lassi Hippeläinen wrote:

>>... The other problem
>> with those old rolleis is they have an extra dim focus screen which is
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> A few days ago I was lucky enough to get a Rolleigrid to my old 'flex.
> It's only a slab of plastic, but still the effect is pretty stunning.

Almost anything is better than the -ground piece of glass- those old
rollei's came with!
Signature


 Stacey

KFritch - 30 Jun 2004 13:16 GMT
The viewing screens on the later Rolleis like the Vb and 3.5F weren't all that
bad.
Oddly enough, though, I've found that in really dim situations, the older
MX-EVS is best for me since I can fit a focuspot to it.  These were made by
Kalart and seem only to fit the older 3.5 rolleflexes.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.