Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Large Format / November 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

question about Schneider-Kreuznach lens

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
tracym@don'task.com - 13 Sep 2006 01:11 GMT
hi,

I've got a Schneider-Kreuznach lens, Symmar 1: 5, 6/210, 1: 12/370

on my 4x5 camera.  I know it's a standard 210mm lens, but what
does the 1: 12/370 part mean?

thanks,

tracy
Bandicoot - 13 Sep 2006 01:04 GMT
> hi,
>
> I've got a Schneider-Kreuznach lens, Symmar 1: 5, 6/210, 1: 12/370
>
> on my 4x5 camera.  I know it's a standard 210mm lens, but what
> does the 1: 12/370 part mean?

The Symmar is a (nearly) symmetrical design with both the individual cells
(in front of and behind the shutter) capable of forming an image, and the
two together cancelling out (well, nearly) many of the aberrations.  A 'side
effect' of the symmetrical design is that it is also a "convertible" lens.

This means that you can remove one of the cells and use just the other as a
lens of somewhat reduced quality but longer focal length.  In the case of
the Symmar design the results when 'converted' are better with just the rear
cell than with just the front one, and you will find that the front cell
unscrews from the shutter with a sturdier screw-thread than on most lenses,
precisely because it is designed to be removed and replaced in this way.
(You can remove the rear cell instead and get almost the same focal length
as with the front cell removed, but at slightly less bellows draw.)  Symmars
in their original shutters normally have a second set of aperture markings
on the shutter for use when converted, and these are normally marked in
green, matching the green designation on the front ring of the lens.

With the 210mm f5.6, the converted focal length is 370mm, with a maximum
aperture of f12 - hence the markings you see.  There should be a second
aperture scale that starts at f12 too, but if not you can ask here and
someone will tell you how to find where to mark the scale.

I have this lens too, and at 210mm it is very good.  Converted it is less
so, but still very useable, and the converted lens is not a bad thing for
portraits.

Peter
tracym@don'task.com - 13 Sep 2006 03:02 GMT
>The Symmar is a (nearly) symmetrical design with both the individual cells
>(in front of and behind the shutter) capable of forming an image, and the
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>on the shutter for use when converted, and these are normally marked in
>green, matching the green designation on the front ring of the lens.

I checked it, and it does have the 1: 12/370 in green, but not the
second set of markings,  It has one gray or silver set on the top,
going from 6.8 to 64, and from 400 to T (the T is green), and on the
bottom the aperture & F-stop markings are also in gray or silver, and
go in reverse order:  T to 400, and 64 to 6.8.

Is the set on the bottom for the converted lens?

>With the 210mm f5.6, the converted focal length is 370mm, with a maximum
>aperture of f12 - hence the markings you see.  There should be a second
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>so, but still very useable, and the converted lens is not a bad thing for
>portraits.

Thank you very much,

Tracy

PS I took a lcass but haven't used this camera in a while.
David Nebenzahl - 13 Sep 2006 03:41 GMT
tracym@don'task.com spake thus:

> I checked it, and it does have the 1: 12/370 in green, but not the
> second set of markings,  It has one gray or silver set on the top,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Is the set on the bottom for the converted lens?

No, because it's the same as the one on the top (6.8 - 64). You need a
scale that goes from 12 to ?? (probably 64, maybe 128). By the way, the
T-400 scale is for the shutter.

Signature

Napoleon won the battle of Waterloo. The German Wehrmacht won World War
II. The United States won in Vietnam, and the Soviets in Afghanistan.
The Zealots won against the Romans, and Ehud Olmert won the Second
Lebanon War.

- Uri Avnery, Israeli peace activist
(http://counterpunch.org/avnery09022006.html)

Dan Fromm - 13 Sep 2006 12:54 GMT
> >The Symmar is a (nearly) symmetrical design with both the individual cells
> >(in front of and behind the shutter) capable of forming an image, and the
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> PS I took a lcass but haven't used this camera in a while.

Hmm.  You have a lens whose maximum aperture is f/5.6 in a shutter
whose aperture scale starts at f/6.8.  Your lens cells have been moved
from the shutter they were originally delivered in into another
shutter.  You might want to have the shutter's aperture scale replaced
with one that's right for your 210/5.6.
tracym@don'task.com - 25 Sep 2006 02:45 GMT
>Hmm.  You have a lens whose maximum aperture is f/5.6 in a shutter
>whose aperture scale starts at f/6.8.  Your lens cells have been moved
>from the shutter they were originally delivered in into another
>shutter.  You might want to have the shutter's aperture scale replaced
>with one that's right for your 210/5.6.

Well, if the aperture scale for the 370mm  should start at f12, and
if f12 isthe maximum aperture for the lens, then:

The same should be true when it's in 210 mode, right?
In other words, the maximum aperture is f5.6, and the
aperture settings should _start_  at f5.6.  Or something
like that, right?
tracym@don'task.com - 25 Sep 2006 03:48 GMT
>>Hmm.  You have a lens whose maximum aperture is f/5.6 in a shutter
>>whose aperture scale starts at f/6.8.  Your lens cells have been moved
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>aperture settings should _start_  at f5.6.  Or something
>like that, right?

I mean, when I was using this lens as a normal 210mm lens
in  class, I did not have problems with getting aperture
settings and etc. right, and got quite nice results, and
I was a beginning photography student who jumped
into this with other intermediate to advanced people.

So this setup can't be quite all that bad......
Greg "_" - 27 Sep 2006 02:47 GMT
> >>Hmm.  You have a lens whose maximum aperture is f/5.6 in a shutter
> >>whose aperture scale starts at f/6.8.  Your lens cells have been moved
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> So this setup can't be quite all that bad......

Hum? a relative beginner? looking for validation without examples
for proof.
Signature

Reality-Is finding that perfect picture
and never looking back.

www.gregblankphoto.com

Greg "_" - 27 Sep 2006 02:42 GMT
> >Hmm.  You have a lens whose maximum aperture is f/5.6 in a shutter
> >whose aperture scale starts at f/6.8.  Your lens cells have been moved
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> aperture settings should _start_  at f5.6.  Or something
> like that, right?

You'd think: but the configuration of the elements probably
has different light gathering abilities therefore under different FL's
give differing exposures. even when they share the same over all
opening of the aperture.
Signature

Reality-Is finding that perfect picture
and never looking back.

www.gregblankphoto.com

PCR - 13 Sep 2006 01:52 GMT
The lens is a convertable lens.  If you remove the front element it bcomes a
F12 370mm lens.
PCR
> hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> tracy
tracym@don'task.com - 13 Sep 2006 02:28 GMT
>The lens is a convertable lens.  If you remove the front element it bcomes a
>F12 370mm lens.

Thank you very much.

tracy
2Capture - 13 Sep 2006 19:43 GMT
intersting.,..never knew that the lens is 2 part and can change to
magnify more.

Isn't this regarded as one of the sharpest lens'?
Richard Knoppow - 19 Sep 2006 22:25 GMT
> intersting.,..never knew that the lens is 2 part and can
> change to
> magnify more.
>
> Isn't this regarded as one of the sharpest lens'?

  Its a very good lens but the convertible feature required
some compromise in design. The later version was not made to
be convertible and has somewhat better correction. However,
many lenses can be used as "convertibles" provided the cells
will form an image. Symmars, Dagors, Convertible Protars,
are all essentially double meniscus lenses and either side
may be used alone. The image quality is not as good as the
combined lens and coverage is less.
  The Zeiss Convertible Protar, and to some degree the
Convertible Symmar, have each cell corrected for coma, Dagor
cells do not. In a combined lens this aberration is
corrected by the symmetry. Coma causes spots of light to
become blured in a tear-drop shape away from the center of
the image. It is reduced by stopping the lens down. Dagor
cells don't get acceptably sharp at the corners until about
f/45. A Convertible Protar or Symmar will be sharp at
somewhat larger stops.
  Convertible lenses were very popular in the days when
most LF images were contact printed because they are
economical. Some were sold in sets, for instance, the Zeiss
Convertible Protar (also made by Bausch & Lomb) was sold in
sets of up to four cells of different focal lengths which
could be used individually or in groups for a variety of
focal lengths.

Signature

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com

Matt Clara - 21 Sep 2006 03:42 GMT
>> intersting.,..never knew that the lens is 2 part and can change to
>> magnify more.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> was sold in sets of up to four cells of different focal lengths which
> could be used individually or in groups for a variety of focal lengths.

And Cooke has brought back the Series XV with the XVa.
http://tinyurl.com/hq9w3 (goes to Cooke Optics website)
Richard Knoppow - 21 Sep 2006 21:56 GMT
>>> intersting.,..never knew that the lens is 2 part and can
>>> change to
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> And Cooke has brought back the Series XV with the XVa.
> http://tinyurl.com/hq9w3 (goes to Cooke Optics website)

   The TT&H Cooke Convertible Series 15 was a unique
design. Each cell has four elements in two air-spaced
groups. There may be some advantage to this construction but
the original lens had excessive flare because of having four
glass-air surfaces in each cell, double the number of the
Zeiss Convertible Protar. Since the new Cooke lens is
multi-coated this is of no concern. I don't have the patent
for the original so I don't know what the design approach
was. Older English patents do not seem to be available on
the web. However, its designer, H.W.Lee, was one of the
great lens designers so I have no doubt its an outstanding
lens.
 It would be interesting to know the merits of the
design relative to the Plasmat type which is the basis of
most of the large format camera lenses and a great many
enlarging lenses for all formates today.
  The Plasmat is derived from the Dagor by air-spacing the
negative element of each half. This gives the designer the
ability to change the curvature of the two surfaces plus
he/she has the spacing as another variable. Compared to the
Dagor a Plasmat has much less spherical aberration (a
problem wtih Dagors) and is capable of excellent correction
for astigmatism. The application of air-spacing to the
Protar type may have resulted in a similar improvement but
it may not be much compared to a modern Plasmat. BTW,
Plasmats also suffered from excessive flare so the design
was not much exploited until the availability of good lens
coatings post WW-2.

Signature

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com

Richard Knoppow - 29 Nov 2006 21:21 GMT
> hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> tracy

  I've just gone over this thread again. I missed the part
about the aperture scale on the shutter starting at f/6.8.
Its not the right scale for this lens so probably the lens
was remounted in this shutter. Its not difficult to
calibrate the f/stops of a lens, I've posted instructions
here before but will do so again. Symmar lenses were
supplied in Compur shutters and were mounted without
adaptors so probably the cell spacing is OK. You can check
this by focusing on a very distant object and seeing how
sharp the image stays at the corners. If the cell spacing is
way off the marginal image will be quite blurry.
  The f/stops of a lens are not in general the physical
size of the aperture but rather the size of what is called
the entrance pupil. The entrance pupil is the _image_ of the
aperture as seen from the front of the lens. It is either
magnified or reduced by the front cell, depending on where
the front cell is positive (as in the Symmar) or negative
(as in a Triplet or Tessar). Where there is only a single
lens located behind the aperture stop, as in many
convertible lenses when only one cell is used, the aperture
stop _is_ the entrance pupil and its physical size is the
quantity you want. Usually, the marked focal length is close
enough to the actual focal length to use it for calculating
the stop. Just devide the focal length by the diameter of
the stop.
 To measure the size of the entrance pupil you will need a
white card with a small hole in it and a small light source,
a pencil flashlight will do. You also need a flat mirror
that will fit over the front of the lens. While a
first-surface mirror is ideal an ordinary shaving or makeup
mirror will do providing its flat (not magnifying).
  The first step is to focus the lens exactly at infinity.
This is done by "autocollimating", the lens acts as its own
collimator. A collimator is a device that emmits light that
is in parallel lines, that is, appears to come from an
infinite distance.
  Place the flat mirror over the lens. Place the white card
behind the lens with the flashlight behind the hole. The
mirror will reflect the image of the light back to the card.
Adjust the reflection so that the image is near the hole.
Focus for as sharp an image as you can get. The lens is now
focused exactly at infinity. Now, leave the card and
flashlight in place and remove the mirror. Place a
translucent screen over the lens, ordinary thin writing
paper will do. There will be a round circle of light on the
paper. This is the entrance pupil. Measure its diameter and
devide the focal length of the lens by it. This is the
f/stop. Once you have set this up you can calibrate a new
stop scale for the lens.
  For stops using only a single element on the back of the
shutter you can still use this method or simply measure the
size of the iris since, again, the physical size of the stop
and the size of the entrance pupil are the same when there
is no lens in front of the iris.
  There are a number of ways to make aperture scales
ranging from simply marking them on tape or paint over the
old plate (turn it around and paint the back for instance),
to having a new one engraved.
  You can use your view camera as a sort of optical bench
for making these measurements.
  This is a pretty old lens but its worth e-mailing
Schneider to find out if they have an aperture plate stuck
away somewhere. They can only say no.
  Schneider has a fair amount of information on
discontinued lenses on their web site so you may be able to
find one which shows the proper cell spacing or, perhaps,
the same e-mail could ask about that. If the new shutter is
the same as the original the spacing will be OK.
 I have one of these lenses. Its a very good lens and
performance of the back element by itself is reasonably good
at small stops. BTW, the front element can also be used by
itself. The threads of front and back are different, at
least on my lens, so you can't move the front cell to the
back, which is the ideal position for it. However, the
difference in correction between the two positions is small.
There is an advantage to using the cell in front: the cells
of this type of lens has principle points (where the light
appears to come from) located such that the lens appears to
be slightly retrofocus when in the "normal" position on the
back of the shutter, and slightly telephoto when in front.
Thus, the front position reduces bellows draw by more than
just the physical thickness of the shutter. It makes it
possible to use some very long lenses on cameras which do
not have enough bellows draw when the lens is in the "ideal"
position.

Signature

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.