: > Is there a site on this camera, its history, accessories, quirks,
: > lenses, etc.?
: Try www.largeformatphotography.info
: I doubt there is a site dedicated to the CC-400. It was the workhorse of
: view cameras in the 60s/70s. Cheap, well-built, no frills.
What a workhorse they were and in my case still is!! I got mine cheap on Ebay
and it even came with the original manual.

Signature
Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------
fwp@deepthought.com
evan clarke - 13 Apr 2005 20:43 GMT
I have one in squeaky mint condition which was branded for Kodak as a Master
View. They are very good, rigid and light cameras..Evan Clarke
> : > Is there a site on this camera, its history, accessories, quirks,
> : > lenses, etc.?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> -------------------
> fwp@deepthought.com
Frank Pittel - 26 Apr 2005 05:43 GMT
Sounds like a great camera. For reasons I don't understand the cc-400 is
looked down on by a lot of people. There is a reason that they were as
popular as they were!
People seem to have a hard time believing me when I tell them that the cc-400
was easy to carry out in the field. It in fact is a lot lighter the it
appears.
: I have one in squeaky mint condition which was branded for Kodak as a Master
: View. They are very good, rigid and light cameras..Evan Clarke
: > : > Is there a site on this camera, its history, accessories, quirks,
: > : > lenses, etc.?
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
: > -------------------
: > fwp@deepthought.com

Signature
Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------
fwp@deepthought.com
Nick Zentena - 26 Apr 2005 10:48 GMT
> People seem to have a hard time believing me when I tell them that the cc-400
> was easy to carry out in the field. It in fact is a lot lighter the it
> appears.
It's not the weight. It's that damn rail. My folding camera is about the
same weight maybe a bit more then my long bellows 400. But it folds into a
nice little package. Much easier to carry.
Nick
Todd Maurer - 28 Apr 2005 19:30 GMT
I used a short rail in the field. Did a lot of landscape work with. The
rail was still a nuisance, though. Finally traded "up" to a self-modified
Speed-graphic. Lost lots of movements but I didn't use most of them anyway.
The CC-400 cameras are definitely great cameras with lots of movements and a
revolving back with bail (bale?) to boot.
Todd

Signature
See fine art photography at: www.konabear.com
>
>> People seem to have a hard time believing me when I tell them that the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Nick