Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Large Format / April 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

What camera is this?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
thelasian - 08 Apr 2005 15:36 GMT
Can anyone help settle a dispute and identify this camera:

http://www.geocities.com/thelasian/index.html

Is it a Calumet C400, and is there a website or something on it?

thanks much
Mike - 08 Apr 2005 16:41 GMT
Yes, it looks like a Calumet CC-400

> Can anyone help settle a dispute and identify this camera:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> thanks much
Jean-David Beyer - 08 Apr 2005 16:49 GMT
> Can anyone help settle a dispute and identify this camera:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> thanks much

Looks like a CC-400, but it could be CC-401 (longer monorail).

Signature

 .~.  Jean-David Beyer          Registered Linux User 85642.
 /V\  PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A         Registered Machine   241939.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey    http://counter.li.org
^^-^^ 11:45:00 up 14 days, 1:02, 3 users, load average: 4.37, 4.31, 4.28

thelasian - 08 Apr 2005 17:39 GMT
Is there a site on this camera, its history, accessories, quirks,
lenses, etc.?
PGG - 09 Apr 2005 03:15 GMT
> Is there a site on this camera, its history, accessories, quirks,
> lenses, etc.?

Try www.largeformatphotography.info

I doubt there is a site dedicated to the CC-400.  It was the workhorse of
view cameras in the 60s/70s.  Cheap, well-built, no frills.  
Frank Pittel - 09 Apr 2005 08:23 GMT
: > Is there a site on this camera, its history, accessories, quirks,
: > lenses, etc.?

: Try www.largeformatphotography.info

: I doubt there is a site dedicated to the CC-400.  It was the workhorse of
: view cameras in the 60s/70s.  Cheap, well-built, no frills.  

What a workhorse they were and in my case still is!! I got mine cheap on Ebay
and it even came with the original manual.

Signature

Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------
fwp@deepthought.com

evan clarke - 13 Apr 2005 20:43 GMT
I have one in squeaky mint condition which was branded for Kodak as a Master
View. They are very good, rigid and light cameras..Evan Clarke

> : > Is there a site on this camera, its history, accessories, quirks,
> : > lenses, etc.?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> -------------------
> fwp@deepthought.com
Frank Pittel - 26 Apr 2005 05:43 GMT
Sounds like a great camera. For reasons I don't understand the cc-400 is
looked down on by a lot of people. There is a reason that they were as
popular as they were!

People seem to have a hard time believing me when I tell them that the cc-400
was easy to carry out in the field. It in fact is a lot lighter the it
appears.

: I have one in squeaky mint condition which was branded for Kodak as a Master
: View. They are very good, rigid and light cameras..Evan Clarke

: > : > Is there a site on this camera, its history, accessories, quirks,
: > : > lenses, etc.?
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
: > -------------------
: > fwp@deepthought.com

Signature

Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------
fwp@deepthought.com

Nick Zentena - 26 Apr 2005 10:48 GMT
> People seem to have a hard time believing me when I tell them that the cc-400
> was easy to carry out in the field. It in fact is a lot lighter the it
> appears.

 It's not the weight. It's that damn rail. My folding camera is about the
same weight maybe a bit more then my long bellows 400. But it folds into a
nice little package. Much easier to carry.

    Nick
Todd Maurer - 28 Apr 2005 19:30 GMT
I used  a short rail in the field.  Did a lot of landscape work with.  The
rail was still a nuisance, though.  Finally traded "up" to a self-modified
Speed-graphic.  Lost lots of movements but I didn't use most of them anyway.
The CC-400 cameras are definitely great cameras with lots of movements and a
revolving back with bail (bale?) to boot.

Todd

Signature

See fine art photography at: www.konabear.com

>
>> People seem to have a hard time believing me when I tell them that the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>     Nick
Richard Knoppow - 11 Apr 2005 10:50 GMT
> Can anyone help settle a dispute and identify this camera:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> thanks much

   It is a CC-400. These are very versitile view cameras with no
glamour whatever. They started life as a Kodak model, the Kodak 4x5
Masterview. At some date around the early 1960's the design was aquired
by Calumet who made some minor changes and built the camera in three
versions for many years. The three versions have different length
bellows draw and rail. The CC-401 has a bag bellows and short rail for
use with wide angle lenses, the CC-402 has an extended bellows and
rail.
   Eventually, Calumet sold the design and it was built by Burke &
James and as the Orbit camera, and perhaps a couple of other names.
Don't let its unpreposessing looks fool you about its capability as a
camera.
   Its been a long time since Calumet has made these guys but its just
possible that they may have copied instruction books for them. They do
have a small stock of parts.
   Shown in one of the photos is a reflex finder. There was also a
compendium lens shade and filter holder available.  I have no idea of
current value. I got mine several years ago at a local sale for $150 US
complete with original aluminum case and lens shade but no lens. If you
get an original Calumet case you will probably have to replace the foam
lining, it rots after a while.
   While Calumet lensboards are flat metal with a ridge around the
edge the camera will take 4"x4" lens boards of the type used on
Anniversary Speed Graphics, B&J press cameras, and the graflex View
camera.
   Not ideal for field use because it doesn't fold it is nonetheless a
very good camera usually available at bargain prices.

--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, 90026
dickburk@ix.netcom.com
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.