>David,
>
>We need more information to answer this question. What and where are
>you going to be photographing?
I'm not envisioning any long treks into wilderness areas, but it will
be used outdoors. Primarily, at least now, for photographing flowers,
some buildings, some landscapes. Also, I want to try portraits with a
4X5.
>The Cambo weighs 16 lb., the Sinar 8.8
>and the Horseman 10. All will take fine pictures. Based on the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>it). :-). Hint, it is not the camera that takes the picture. Once
>you buy into a system you are pretty much stuck with it.
Given this, maybe the better question would have been "What system?"
Assuming they all pretty much have the accessories I may want later,
and the accessory prices are somewhat the same, would Cambo or
possibly Horseman be a good choice? Sinar add-ons seem a bit pricey.
Thanks to all for the help. I'm looking forward to big negatives and
a more contemplative approach to my photography. 35mm, and sometimes
MF, make it tempting to blast away & hope you get something good.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Professional Shop Rat: 14,420 days in a GM plant.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Phil Tobias - 24 Aug 2004 03:15 GMT
>>Sinar add-ons seem a bit pricey.
They are. But given the Toyota or Chevy Principle that another mentioned, lots
of "folks already own" Sinar add-ons. So there are quite a few used goodies
available at better prices.
Good luck. ...pt
-------------------------------
Business/Communications start at http://www.PhilipTobias.com.
Grow your business using my technical and marketing communications -
Effective writing, graphic design, multimedia, photos, and Web sites.