>Subject: Two older Fujichrome films, not in Bill Tuthil's table...
>From: ThomasH henrymot@some.net
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>Thanks in advance,
>Thomas
> >Subject: Two older Fujichrome films, not in Bill Tuthil's table...
> >From: ThomasH henrymot@some.net
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> chrome films and before Fuji Sensia as mentioned. Wish I still had some in my
> freezer...
Thanks, maybe someone still has a specification of these
materials for Bill's table? I will dig a bit my collection
of "unnecessary papers and brochures..."
Thomas
> Check out my photos at "LEWISVISION":
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> ***DUE TO SPAM, I NOW BLOCK ALL E-MAIL NOT ON MY LIST, TO BE ADDED TO MY LIST,
> PING ME ON THE NEWSGROUP. SORRY FOR THE INCONVENIENCE. :-) ***
> RF I believe refers to Fujichrome 50, a highly saturated slow speed film
> (not quite as saturated as Velvia but probably more than Kodachrome 25).
Thanks Lewis, I had never heard of RF. Velvia became RVP (V instead of F).
> RD refers to Fujichrome 100, Fujichrome 50's "faster brother".
> Perhaps the 049 refers to some kind of emulsion batch, I don't know.
> Both were excellent films. Shot them in the 80's and early 90's
> before Kodak came out with their Elite chrome films and before Fuji
> Sensia as mentioned. Wish I still had some in my freezer...
That's right, I have seen a lot of RD. Fuji eventually evolved this
emulsion into the Provia line (RDP II) and split off Astia (RAP) as
the natural-color lower-contrast choice. After "sigma-crystal" grain
technology was integrated, RDP II became RDP III, AKA Provia 100F.
If you find datasheets for RD/RF, please send numbers to plug into the
http://creekin.net/films.htm table.
ThomasH - 04 Jan 2005 05:30 GMT
> > RF I believe refers to Fujichrome 50, a highly saturated slow speed film
> > (not quite as saturated as Velvia but probably more than Kodachrome 25).
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> If you find datasheets for RD/RF, please send numbers to plug into the
> http://creekin.net/films.htm table.
Nothing so far! I found however a few references to Fujichrome RF and RD
on the web, none of them led to a spec data! I will keep looking and
ask a friend of mine on the other side of the Great Lake.
Thomas
Lewis Lang - 04 Jan 2005 08:46 GMT
>Subject: Re: Two older Fujichrome films, not in Bill Tuthil's table...
>From: Bill Tuthill can@spam.co
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>If you find datasheets for RD/RF, please send numbers to plug into the
>http://creekin.net/films.htm table.
Sorry, Bill, I don't think I've had those sheets (if I ever did have them)
since the early to possibly mid '90's. Perhaps calling or emailing Fuji and
asking to speak to somone who's either in the professional division (if they
have one) and/or someone whose been there for a while might bring someone who
still has/saved it.
Check out my photos at "LEWISVISION":
http://members.aol.com/Lewisvisn/home.htm
Remove "nospam" to reply
***DUE TO SPAM, I NOW BLOCK ALL E-MAIL NOT ON MY LIST, TO BE ADDED TO MY LIST,
PING ME ON THE NEWSGROUP. SORRY FOR THE INCONVENIENCE. :-) ***
Ted - 16 Jan 2005 03:00 GMT
> If you find datasheets for RD/RF, please send numbers to plug into
> the http://creekin.net/films.htm table.
I used quite a bit of RD (Fujichrome 100). I remember that it had an RMS
11 granularity rating. If that helps....
---
Non-spam e-mail: usenet{AT}tedsimages{dot}com
Visit my Virtual Light Table: http://www.tedsimages.com
Travel, scenic, and fine art photography