Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Film and Labs / September 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Kodak's Ultra Color film

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Frank Pittel - 28 Aug 2004 23:21 GMT
I've just got the 100 speed roll I got in the trial pack Kodak sent me and I
like what I see. The colors are saturated the way I like them without being
cartoonish. I could see switching to it from Fuji's NPS. I looked around and
noticed that they don't have it available as sheet film. Since 95+% of the film
I shoot is 4x5 this will be a major sticking point in terms of me switching.

I like to use the same film across format (35mm, 120/220, 4x5) and if I can't
get it in 4x5 I'll end up sticking with Fuji print film. Does anyone know if
Kodak has any plans of making it available in sheet film??

Signature

Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------
fwp@deepthought.com

Jim Phelps - 29 Aug 2004 11:29 GMT
> I've just got the 100 speed roll I got in the trial pack Kodak sent me and I
> like what I see. The colors are saturated the way I like them without being
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> get it in 4x5 I'll end up sticking with Fuji print film. Does anyone know if
> Kodak has any plans of making it available in sheet film??

Frank,

  I know this is a dumb comment, but Kodak will give you the best answer.

Jim
Frank Pittel - 30 Aug 2004 17:15 GMT
: > I've just got the 100 speed roll I got in the trial pack Kodak sent me and
: I
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
: if
: > Kodak has any plans of making it available in sheet film??

: Frank,

:    I know this is a dumb comment, but Kodak will give you the best answer.

I called and the person I got on the phone didn't know!! :-(

Signature

Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------
fwp@deepthought.com

Bill Tuthill - 30 Aug 2004 18:01 GMT
> : > I like to use the same film across format (35mm, 120/220, 4x5) and if I
> : > can't get it in 4x5 I'll end up sticking with Fuji print film.  Does
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> I called and the person I got on the phone didn't know!! :-(

Frank, I doubt it will be made available in 4x5, because Portra 400UC
and its successor Ultra Color 400 are still not available in that size.
From Kodak you're stuck with 160NC and 160VC, I guess (although I find
160NC to be an absolutely great film).

Here's a question for you: do you find that different format film sizes
have different emulsion requirements?

For example, the high micro-contrast that helps APS and 35mm achieve
high resolution may be a drawback for sheet film, causing too-high contrast
and resulting in poor tonal transitions.
Gregory Blank - 31 Aug 2004 00:46 GMT
Portra NC & VC 400 were available in sheet film
however I deemed the NC version to have rather muted  
color.

> Frank, I doubt it will be made available in 4x5, because Portra 400UC
> and its successor Ultra Color 400 are still not available in that size.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> high resolution may be a drawback for sheet film, causing too-high contrast
> and resulting in poor tonal transitions.

Signature

LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918

Frank Pittel - 31 Aug 2004 18:38 GMT
: > : > I like to use the same film across format (35mm, 120/220, 4x5) and if I
: > : > can't get it in 4x5 I'll end up sticking with Fuji print film.  Does
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
: >
: > I called and the person I got on the phone didn't know!! :-(

: Frank, I doubt it will be made available in 4x5, because Portra 400UC
: and its successor Ultra Color 400 are still not available in that size.
: From Kodak you're stuck with 160NC and 160VC, I guess (although I find
: 160NC to be an absolutely great film).

I'm sorry to hear that. I tried the Portra films and prefer the Fuji NPS films.
I don't do any portrait work and as a result like very saturated films.

: Here's a question for you: do you find that different format film sizes
: have different emulsion requirements?

: For example, the high micro-contrast that helps APS and 35mm achieve
: high resolution may be a drawback for sheet film, causing too-high contrast
: and resulting in poor tonal transitions.

I've never used APS and only use 35mm for low end snapshot type stuff. I
normally use LF and use MF when I need the portability. As a result I'm not
terribly interested in what makes for a "high quality" image from 35mm.

What is important to me, is to be able to use the same film across the film
formats that I use. I want to be able to become comfortable with a limited types
of film. Otherwise there are to many things to keep track of.

In any case I thank you for your quick reply and humbly ask that you pass my
request for the Ultra Color 100 film in 4x5 up the marketing chain. :-)
Signature


Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------
fwp@deepthought.com

Bill Tuthill - 31 Aug 2004 19:02 GMT
> In any case I thank you for your quick reply and humbly ask that you pass my
> request for the Ultra Color 100 film in 4x5 up the marketing chain. :-)

For 35mm, I found that Ultra Color 400 is less grainy than Ultra Color 100.
Perhaps UC100 is sharper or something, but I could not see that in scans.
Have you tried UC400 yet?
Gregory Blank - 31 Aug 2004 21:19 GMT
Don't know if I would consider NPS as very saturated,
Its a good match for Provia 100 if your doing conventional prints.

Provia to my eye is more a normal rendering film than say E100VS or
Velvia which I classify as very saturated.

Provia versus say EPN however would lead one to say Provia
is more saturated. For 35mm work I actually prefer Sensia
to Provia as Sensia is a little warmer it seems and a little more
saturated.

> I'm sorry to hear that. I tried the Portra films and prefer the Fuji NPS
> films.
> I don't do any portrait work and as a result like very saturated films.

Signature

LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918

Frank Pittel - 01 Sep 2004 16:42 GMT
: Don't know if I would consider NPS as very saturated,
: Its a good match for Provia 100 if your doing conventional prints.

I agree about NPS not being super saturated. I like the film and it's colors.
It also meets my requirement of being available in 35mm, 120/220, and 4x5. I
used to use Kodak's Royal Gold 100 for 35mm but switched to NPS when they
dropped it.

: Provia to my eye is more a normal rendering film than say E100VS or
: Velvia which I classify as very saturated.

I switched to E100vs about a year and a half ago. Until then I was using
Ecktachrome 64 but was getting the feeling that Kodak was looking to drop it.
I decided on E100VS after I got a couple of rolls of all the non-consumer grade
slide film I could get my hands on. I preferred the results I got from E100VS.
The only one I didn't like were the two E100G films. I found the colors to flat
for my liking.

I know a lot of people that like the Fuji transparency film. I guess it's a
matter of personal taste.?.???

On the positive side I don't do much with color. :-) As an example I just got
back from 5 half days (it rained every day in theafternoon) of photography in
the Colorado Rockies. While there I went through 70 sheets and 10 120 rolls of
Tmax-100, 5 sheets and 6 35mm rolls of E100VS. I shot no color negative film!!

: Provia versus say EPN however would lead one to say Provia
: is more saturated. For 35mm work I actually prefer Sensia
: to Provia as Sensia is a little warmer it seems and a little more
: saturated.

: > I'm sorry to hear that. I tried the Portra films and prefer the Fuji NPS
: > films.
: > I don't do any portrait work and as a result like very saturated films.

: "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
: or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
: is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
: to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918

Signature

Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------
fwp@deepthought.com

Gregory Blank - 01 Sep 2004 18:15 GMT
I use both, Kodak and Fuji- I tend to prefer different films for
different uses, If I could only use one E6 film it would be Provia.

But I also like the E100G films they are saturated under the
circumstances I use them for which is long exposures under interior
lighting.

Every film has a personality and using different filters can
show the strengths and weaknesses of specific film under specific
use.... so hopefully we won't have to be limited to Kodak or Fuji.

> I know a lot of people that like the Fuji transparency film. I guess it's a
> matter of personal taste.?.???

Signature

LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918

Frank Pittel - 01 Sep 2004 19:14 GMT
: I use both, Kodak and Fuji- I tend to prefer different films for
: different uses, If I could only use one E6 film it would be Provia.

I know many people that use Provia with excellent result. It's a fine film.

: But I also like the E100G films they are saturated under the
: circumstances I use them for which is long exposures under interior
: lighting.

It may be that the E100G films work best with controlled lighting indoors.
Most of what I do is outdoor landscape with the occasional close up of flowers
and other plant life. For those situations I prefer the high saturation
although non-cartoonish colors of E100VS. Again it's a matter of personal
preference. After all if there was the one perfect film there would be no need
for all the different types. :-)

: Every film has a personality and using different filters can
: show the strengths and weaknesses of specific film under specific
: use.... so hopefully we won't have to be limited to Kodak or Fuji.

True!!! As I mentioned that's why there are different films and it's important to
know what films work under different conditions. As a capitalist I believe that
competition is a good thing for all involved and therefore think it's important
that Kodak has real competitor. As a personal matter as a US company I prefer to
use Kodak film and use that as a deciding factor when all else is equal. The
reason I switched to Fuji for color negative film is that I got tired of having
Kodak discontinue a film just as I was getting used to it and then have to start
all over again. When they dropped their Royal Gold 100 I switched to Fuji NPS
and only looked back with the Ultra Color film. I just wish they made it in
sheet film. :-(

: > I know a lot of people that like the Fuji transparency film. I guess it's a
: > matter of personal taste.?.???

: "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
: or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
: is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
: to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918

Signature

Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------
fwp@deepthought.com

DaveHodge - 29 Aug 2004 16:53 GMT
<<  Does anyone know if
Kodak has any plans of making it available in sheet film?? >>

Pose that question to:  ronbaird@kodak.com

He is on the inside and he will either know the answer or can get it for you.
Ron Baird - 30 Aug 2004 18:18 GMT
Greetings Frank,

I appreciate your interest Kodak film.  I have to agree that this film is
one of the best we have ever made.  Actually, Portra 160NC and 160VC have
been (since 1998) and continue to be available in all formats. Our new UC
film is currently only in a roll film. Unfortunately, not all of our films
are available in all formats. UC films presently fall into the latter
catagory.

Stay tuned, however, as we bring out new products and features all the time.
Remember, though, that it is the user that dictates availability and format,
etc.  Kodak will make what you want, if enough people want it.

Talk to you soon.

Ron Baird
Eastman Kodak Company

> I've just got the 100 speed roll I got in the trial pack Kodak sent me and I
> like what I see. The colors are saturated the way I like them without being
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> get it in 4x5 I'll end up sticking with Fuji print film. Does anyone know if
> Kodak has any plans of making it available in sheet film??
Nick Zentena - 30 Aug 2004 18:43 GMT
> Greetings Frank,
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Ron Baird
> Eastman Kodak Company

 While you're here. Can I ask if Colour printing filters are still being
made by Kodak?

    Thanks
    Nick
Ron Baird - 01 Sep 2004 22:39 GMT
Hi Nick,

I can appreciate the interest.

Yes, Wratten CC and CP filters are still made by EK. Color Print Viewing
Filters are not.

You can get from professional dealers.

Ron Baird

> > I appreciate your interest Kodak film.  I have to agree that this film is
> > one of the best we have ever made.  Actually, Portra 160NC and 160VC have
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>      Thanks
>      Nick
Nick Zentena - 01 Sep 2004 23:19 GMT
> Hi Nick,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Ron Baird

 Nobody seems to stocks a set of filters. I checked a few dealer online
catalogs and it seems at most they stock one or two different ones. At least
in the catalog. I only really need them for the extreme cases that over load
my enlargers filters but I'd still rather buy a set.

  Thanks
  Nick
DaveHodge - 02 Sep 2004 16:02 GMT
<< Nobody seems to stocks a set of filters. >>

I have a set of 5x5 in. CP filters I will give you if you want them.  (I've
tried to sell them several times on the photo boards but got no takers.)  They
are "used" but have been kept in cool dry dark storage.   I have the following
filters:
CP2B
CP10R
CP20R
CP40R
CP80R
(You probably know that red=yellow+magenta.)
CP05C
CP10C
CP20C
2-CP40C
CP05Y
CP10Y
CP20Y
CP40Y
CP80Y
CP05M
CP10M
CP20M
2-CP40M

I got these filters a few years ago when I purchased an Omega D-II enlarger and
accessories from a professional photographer who was closing his lab.  He used
them in the 4x5 enlarger, but I have not used them.  These filters have been
'trimmed' (i.e., corners rounded) to fit the filter drawer of the D-II.

When I was doing my own color printing (mid-1970's) I started with a Durst 606
and later got a Beseler 23C with a color head and analyzer.  With the Durst I
used CP filters.  A Kodak mentor told me about red being magenta+yellow, and
since the total number of filter surfaces used to be a concern (maybe it still
is) using one red filter eliminated 2 or more filter surfaces!

If interested, send me a snail mail address.

Best regards, David Hodge, Churchville,  MD
email: davehodge@aol.com
DaveHodge - 03 Sep 2004 21:25 GMT
<< I have a set of 5x5 in. CP filters I will give you if you want them. >>

I have tried twice to contact zentena@hophead.dyndns.org and his address bombed
both times.

Is there anyone else out there who would like to have a free set of Kodak CP
filters?  If so just email me at: davehodge!aol.com, and send me a snail mail
address.
Nick Zentena - 03 Sep 2004 21:47 GMT
> << I have a set of 5x5 in. CP filters I will give you if you want them. >>
>
> I have tried twice to contact zentena@hophead.dyndns.org and his address bombed
> both times.

 Sorry about that. It's an old email address. I don't think they'd fit my
enlarger if they've been trimmed.

    Thanks
    Nick
DaveHodge - 04 Sep 2004 03:09 GMT
<< Sorry about that. It's an old email address. I don't think they'd fit my
enlarger if they've been trimmed.

    Thanks
    Nick >>

Thanks for the response.  David
Photobossman - 06 Sep 2004 19:58 GMT
You may want to ask Ron Baird where Kodak is having their film Manufactured
you may be surprised!

photobossman

> << Sorry about that. It's an old email address. I don't think they'd fit
> my
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Thanks for the response.  David
Ron Baird - 07 Sep 2004 15:37 GMT
Greetings Photobossman,

Well, actually, the film is created right in good ol Rochester, NY,  as well
as other locations around the world where it makes sense to be.  Since Kodak
is a global company we have manufacturing in all parts of the world, and, of
course, film is included.  No different than most global companies and their
products today.  It is a part of being competitive in a global economy.

Talk to you soon.

Ron Baird
Eastman Kodak Company

> You may want to ask Ron Baird where Kodak is having their film Manufactured
> you may be surprised!
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> >
> > Thanks for the response.  David
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.