I was chatting about Wilhelm recently with a fellow photo enthusiast
who has a few more years under his belt than I do; he made the
following statement, and I'd like to confirm it. Not because I
disagree with him, but because I am curious as to the history of
Wilhelm, this info is pretty important to me, and I want to make sure
that none of it is exaggerated or misremembered.
What he said was this:
"Wilhelm got his reputation in the seventies by predicting accurately
that contary to their claims, Kodak's most popular new papers would
last less than a decade."
Is that all true regarding 'predicting', 'most popular', 'Kodak's
claims', 'less than a decade', etc.? If not, how did Wilhelm build his
reputation exactly? Also, any historical sources you've got would be
very helpful.
Thanks for any insight.
DB.
John Horner - 26 Aug 2004 05:59 GMT
> I was chatting about Wilhelm recently with a fellow photo enthusiast
> who has a few more years under his belt than I do; he made the
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> DB.
Sounds about right. Wilhelm published a landmark book on the topic "The
Permanence and Care of Color Photographs: Traditional and Digital Color
Prints, Color Negatives, Slides, and Motion Pictures" in the 1993 and was
writing and speaking about it much earlier than that. The 70s might be a
bit early of a claim, but I have not followed his work for that many years
:).
John
Dogger the Filmgoblin - 31 Aug 2004 00:25 GMT
> > I was chatting about Wilhelm recently with a fellow photo enthusiast
> > who has a few more years under his belt than I do; he made the
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> bit early of a claim, but I have not followed his work for that many years
> :).
Thanks, John, I appreciate you taking the time to give me your opinion
of this statement.
DB.