Photo Forum / Film Photography / Film and Labs / June 2004
Scanning larger format negs to CD-ROM or DVD
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Bob Hayden - 31 May 2004 08:40 GMT Hi all, Our wedding photographer sent us all of our negatives from our wedding and reception and they are of a larger format, NOT 35mm. In order to preserve their usefulness I would like to have them scanned and have high res pic files put on CDs or DVDs. There are several hundred photos, maybe as many as a thousand, so I'd like it to be someone who not only does good work and is trustworthy, but can do this at a reasonable price. Any idea of what to expect price-wise and where should I turn for these services? Any and all advice appreciated. Bob in RSM, CA
Mark A - 31 May 2004 09:14 GMT > Hi all, > Our wedding photographer sent us all of our negatives from our wedding and [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Any and all advice appreciated. > Bob in RSM, CA More than likely, you have 120 or 220 film which is called medium format (MF). The only difference between 120 and 220 is the length of the roll, they are both the same width (approximately 60 mm). You negatives are probably cut into strips, so the original length is irrelevant.
MF can actually have several size negatives called 645, 6x6, 6x7, 6x9, etc All of them use the same roll film. Many wedding photographers use 6x6 (Hasselblad cameras), and some use 645 or 6x7. 6x9 is rare for weddings.
I think you would have a hard time finding someone to scan them at what you consider to be a reasonable price. It may pay to purchase a decent MF scanner for about $400-$500 and then learn how to scan them yourself. Epson makes a fairly good scanner that also scan prints and documents.The Epson Perfection 4870 PHOTO is one such scanner. The Epson Perfection 4870 PRO is a bit more, but comes with some very good scanning software.
When you are done, you could sell the scanner on ebay for about half what you paid, so it would end up being a very economical solution if you (or someone you know) has the time.
If you really high-res pictures (I doubt it) you would need to send them to a professional scanning lab that would use a drum scanner to get images of about 50 MB each. These would cost $25 or more each. But I am fairly sure you really don't need that level of detail.
Also, assuming the negatives are color, store them in a cool dry place, never in an attack, etc. It would be best to seal them in airtight bags on a very dry day (so as not to trap humidity inside the bag).
In rec.photo.film+labs Mark A <ma@switchboard.net> wrote:
> More than likely, you have 120 or 220 film which is called medium format ...
> consider to be a reasonable price. It may pay to purchase a decent MF > scanner for about $400-$500 and then learn how to scan them yourself. Epson Mark's quite right, IMO; if you can spare the time, buying a scanner would be MUCH cheaper than trying to pay someone to do it for you. The Epson 2450 was well-liked, and a quick peek at Ebay just now shows that they're selling used for around $100. I've got the same scanner at home and it works quite nicely; at that price you could throw the thing away when you're done scanning the wedding pics and you'd still come out way ahead, in terms of price. :-) I've got an Epson 1680 with the transparency adapter at work, and that works a bit better for scanning large numbers of negs or slides, but it's way more expensive (I think around $1200 is what we paid.)
I use my 2450, among other things, for scanning a lot of my father-in-law's old slides, so all his kids can have copies of them. The scanning is sort of slow, so I'll sit there with a book; read a few pages, take the old slides out, put new ones in, start it scanning again, and read a few more pages. :-) Slow but not unpleasant. And the 2450 will do medium-format negatives--not all scanners will.
Good luck and let us know what you decide!
_______________________________________________ Ken Kuzenski AC4RD kuzen001 at acpub .duke .edu _______________________________________________ All disclaimers apply, see? www.duke.edu/~kuzen001
Gary W. McIntyre - 31 May 2004 12:41 GMT > Hi all, > Our wedding photographer sent us all of our negatives from our wedding and [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Any and all advice appreciated. > Bob in RSM, CA Bob,
Take the negs to a local professional lab (look in your yellow pages) and have them scanned. Be prepared to spend a few bucks per scan, yes I know it'll cost you quite a bit of money, but it is YOUR wedding! Call a few labs and get some pricing and don't go with the cheapest, again it's yuour wedding. Don't be tempted to buy a scanner and do it yourself, it's your wedding and your wife will kill you. :) The scanners the pro labs use are worth at least $50K and do a fabulous job, anything you do with a flatbed will be substandard and a cheap 120 film scanner will be at least $3K and really won't do a great job. Screw this up, and your wife will kill you.
I'm not familiar with "RSM" otherwise I'd try to make some recommendations.
JR - 31 May 2004 17:40 GMT > Bob, > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > I'm not familiar with "RSM" otherwise I'd try to make some > recommendations. Bad advice...and bad information. Medium format film can be scanned quite well with a $500 flatbed, and fantastically well with a $1000-$2000 film scanner. I use the Minolta Scan Multi Pro and I get 600+ MB files that are stunning that I can print to poster sizer at 300 dpi...If you have computer aptitude then scanning them yourself is an option, although there is a learning curve. My advice is to pick the ones that are the best, then scan those. You may find that you only need to scan 30, not 300. That may be much more affordable at probably $10 per scan from a pro lab. Or find someone local that is willing to do the job, if you are on SoCal, email me and maybe we can come up with an agreeable price, if you want 300 images scanned, then it may be a few wekks worth of work. It can take 10 minutes per scan depending on the resolution you need.
JR jrhone@mac.com
Mark A - 31 May 2004 20:50 GMT > > Bob, > > [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > JR I doubt seriously that he needs more than about 10MB resolution per scan, except for a few full length portraits. Most wedding photos are shots of the wedding and guests that would not be printed larger than 5x7. If they were stored digitally for display on a computer monitor, I doubt the would ever be printed in the distant future.
Mark A - 31 May 2004 20:45 GMT "Gary W. McIntyre" <sillywillybobsdad_withoutspam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:sillywillybobsdad_withoutspam-> Bob,
> Take the negs to a local professional lab (look in your yellow pages) > and have them scanned. Be prepared to spend a few bucks per scan, yes I [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > film scanner will be at least $3K and really won't do a great job. > Screw this up, and your wife will kill you. Why would she kill him? If you don't like scan, you can do it over again. It is not like he will destroying the negatives.
A pro lab will charge a lot more "a few dollars per scan." More like $25-$50 per scan. The only ones that cost a few dollars per scan are the ones that use the same flatbed scanners (or worse) as I suggested. Also, don't be surprised if the negatives come back scratched and with finger prints from the high school kid they hire to do the work.
You are wrong about flatbed scanners, they work fine for most work, especially if displayed on computer monitor. Wedding photos do not need to contain excruciating detail of a professional photo shoot.
Your statement about not buying a flatbed scanner and doing the work oneself, is obvious self-serving because your are in the professional photo lab business yourself.
Gary W. McIntyre - 01 Jun 2004 00:45 GMT > "Gary W. McIntyre" <sillywillybobsdad_withoutspam@hotmail.com> wrote in > message news:sillywillybobsdad_withoutspam-> Bob, [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > oneself, is obvious self-serving because your are in the professional photo > lab business yourself. Well, she would kill him, if he is like many people and misplaces the negs in the next few years... and has to rely on the scans for output.
I don't work for a lab, nor do I own one. I do visit labs on a daily basis as a techician and have been servicing printers and scanners for many years. The results I have seen from flatbeds with transparency adapters have much lower dynamic range and typically have poor shadow detail. In contrast, a good pro scan looks amazing. My customers routinely do 30 mb scans for a couple bucks, and they do not employ high school kids... actually many of my customers are replacing their optical printers with the intent of scanning all film by the end of the year and the old optical printer operators are the people running the scanners.
Mark A - 01 Jun 2004 03:20 GMT > Well, she would kill him, if he is like many people and misplaces the > negs in the next few years... and has to rely on the scans for output. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > the end of the year and the old optical printer operators are the people > running the scanners. I am not suggesting that someone scan the negatives without looking at them and then through away the negatives. Scan some, and make sure they are done right. No one needs 30BM scans for wedding pictures. 10MB is probably fine.
But I would really like to see the name and/or website of one that does 30MB scans for a couple of bucks.
Flatbed scanner technology has increased dramatically in the last few years and the prices have come down (just like digital cameras). The $500 Epson will produce remarkable results for what is needed in this situation. I am not talking about scans that will be used to make 20" x 30" prints. These are wedding pics.
Gary W. McIntyre - 02 Jun 2004 03:26 GMT > But I would really like to see the name and/or website of one that does 30MB > scans for a couple of bucks. http://www.tcnlab.com/default.htm
30MB scans from full rolls at time of development are $1.50 per frame. Scans from individual frames or cut negs are $8 per frame. Note these prices are in Canadian dollars, so it's almost free in US dollars. :)
filmscan@look.ca - 14 Jun 2004 21:09 GMT Look at my website, covered in my signature below, for my prices for 35mm. Add $500 and I will do the 120/220 negatives since that will pay for the scanner. The basic price per scan will be the same. I can do it if it is NOT in a great rush since I am simply adding to my retirement income.
If I didn't have a pension and other sources of money coming it, I too would be charging $5.00 per scan or more.
The real issue is time. Anyone who does this spends their time instead of your time doing it, and is lucky if they can do a good job of scanning more than 10-15 negatives or slides per hour with a review of each and minimal adjustments for each. That is what you are really paying for... TIME. The equipment gets paid for over time. I have 3 flatbed scsi scanners and one pull through scanner plus a Nikon film scanner with the APS adapter. I do NOT have any for 120/220 film however, so would need to acquire one, and that is not in great demand around here.
In any case, if you do it yourself, you are looking at using up your time, and what is that worth to you and yours? If it is more than any of us charge, choose someone from the various responders and 'save' that way.
In the end it is totally your decision, so go from there..
Filmscan
============================================================ FilmScan@Look.CA Toronto, ON, Canada
See http://members.rogers.com/rheuman/index3.html
Copyright retained for what it is worth. If this is illegal where you are, do not read it. Trademark also retained.....
Craig Schroeder - 31 May 2004 14:57 GMT Just curious, but the phrase "preserve their usefulness" left me wondering a bit.
Are you concerned with preservation? Is so, your safety deposit box and proper packaging would be best. Usefulness for sharing digitally (email, etc?), then simple scans of the photos might suffice (I assume they're sharp and well processed if someone bothered with medium format in the first place). Decent hi-res scans of medium format negatives are very bulky as there is a lot of information there! They can take 6-10 minutes each to scan correctly and it sounds like you might have days of work there! Again, it all matters what your intended purpose is in digitizing these.....
>Hi all, >Our wedding photographer sent us all of our negatives from our wedding and [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >Any and all advice appreciated. >Bob in RSM, CA RWatson767 - 01 Jun 2004 07:06 GMT Bob
> Scanning larger format negs to CD-ROM or DVD There are several hundred photos, maybe as many as a thousand,
This must have cost a bundle uness it was a gift. At $10.00 a print it was a several thousand dollar photo job
But what ever. Good scans will cost $5.00 and up. I do jobs like your by the hour. Several per hour for 120/220. Actually have three scanners to work with so things go along quickly.
Bob AZ
Paul Schmidt - 01 Jun 2004 15:42 GMT > Hi all, > Our wedding photographer sent us all of our negatives from our wedding and [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Any and all advice appreciated. > Bob in RSM, CA You could really use any flatbed scanner that has 240DPI (optical) resolution, don't forget that a 120 negative is 4 times the size of a 35mm negative, so prints can be made that are 4 times the size at the same resolution. Now CD's and DVD's are no more archival storage, then the original negatives. In fact storage methods are roughly the same.
Then again, simply store the nrgatives properly, and you can print from the original negative as well. There are 3 enemies for photographic negatives, heat, light and moisture. So you want to store them in a way that they are kept cold, dark and dry. Your targetting storing them for around 100 years, much beyond your own grandchildren, nobody will really care. So, go ahead and scan them if you like, just make sure you store the CD's or DVD's and the Negatives in a different physical location. If there is a fire or tornado or something wipes out your house, and they are stored together, then everything is gone.
Storing the negatives:
Put them in a chemically neutral envelope, put that in a box, put the box in a plastic bag with some desicent inside, put that inside another plastic bag, sealing both with strong tape. Drop the whole thing into the bottom of the deep freeze, and they should be quite happy there, If at some future point, you need them for something, take out the whole thing, let it thaw for a good 3 days, then open the package. Seal it up the same, either refrech the desicent or replace it.
Paul
Tim - 02 Jun 2004 10:28 GMT There is nothing wrong with the current technology in home scanners. In fact many professional photographers are using them to produce some very high quality prints!!! A Perfection 4870 will be more than adequate producing top quality scans. Yes you will obtain more detail from a drum scanner, but I doubt that you would at the prices quoted earlier in this thread. To obtain maximum output you need to put the input (work) into achieving the result. What is your output device? Is your system colour calibrated? Ask yourself if you will be able to notice the small amount of detail a drum scan will reveal? And it is a small amount of detail, the prints from your own scans will only look different under a magnifier, and who looks at photos under a magnifier? There is some good advice in this thread, and some that is a little misleading...
> > Hi all, > > Our wedding photographer sent us all of our negatives from our wedding and [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > > Paul Mark A - 02 Jun 2004 11:12 GMT > There is nothing wrong with the current technology in home scanners. > In fact many professional photographers are using them to produce some [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > There is some good advice in this thread, and some that is a little > misleading... I don't think there is an output device. He wants them for archival purposes. Maybe in the future some will be printed, but these days many people are quite happy to view pics on the monitor (except perhaps for one or two wedding shots).
Gordon Moat - 02 Jun 2004 08:58 GMT > Hi all, > Our wedding photographer sent us all of our negatives from our wedding and [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Any and all advice appreciated. > Bob in RSM, CA You can try getting a Kodak Pro Photo CD, or several. There are more than a few options for scanning your films. Just to give you an idea of options, and a good quality professional lab, take a look at:
<http://www.chromedigital.com/filmscans.html> Be sure to scroll down to see many prices for different types of scans, or just contact them for more specific quoting.
Ciao!
Gordon Moat A G Studio <http://www.allgstudio.com
Mark A - 02 Jun 2004 09:38 GMT > You can try getting a Kodak Pro Photo CD, or several. There are more than a few > options for scanning your films. Just to give you an idea of options, and a [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Gordon Moat Looks to me like the reasonable prices scan options on that website only apply to 35mm and are done by machine with questionable quality. The custom scans (probably all 120/220) are quite expensive.
Gordon Moat - 02 Jun 2004 20:26 GMT > > You can try getting a Kodak Pro Photo CD, or several. There are more than > a few [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > apply to 35mm and are done by machine with questionable quality. The custom > scans (probably all 120/220) are quite expensive. Unfortunately true. However, I thought it was important for you to see a variety of choices. This might make it easier for you to decide if you want to get your own scanner, or shop around for a different service. I have seen places that advertised placing still images onto DVD, but only 35 mm sized. In general, it is faster for a lab to scan 35 mm, and that is reflected in the costs. It might actually be cheaper to have duplicate negatives/positives made, and store the copies in another location for the future.
Ciao!
Gordon Moat A G Studio <http://www.allgstudio.com
Bowzre - 10 Jun 2004 15:36 GMT Do you really need to scan all of them? Why not select the best hundred and have them scanned?
> Hi all, > Our wedding photographer sent us all of our negatives from our wedding and [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Any and all advice appreciated. > Bob in RSM, CA
|
|
|