>>I have a bottle of Kodak Negative cleaner, probably quite old but
>>works.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> vast knowledge in rec.photo.film+labs, that maybe someone out there had
> already faced this problem and solved it.
Is there a museum in town? Are the plates of historical value, even
something like the plate is of your great great grandfather who lived in
the town from 1875 until 1928. Museums love this kind of material,
especially if the history is known. More then one museum has been
willing to do this kind of restoration, if they can get their hands on
the material. If you offer to loan the museum the plates, long term
open ended loan, where you can ask for the material back at some future
point, they might have better long term storage available too.
Of course all you really want is a copy that you can use. So if you can
get the plates separated, and scanned, your probably happy.
Paul
Derek Gee - 26 Mar 2004 03:21 GMT
> >>I have a bottle of Kodak Negative cleaner, probably quite old but
> >>works.
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> open ended loan, where you can ask for the material back at some future
> point, they might have better long term storage available too.
These particular plates belong to a friend of mine, and I doubt he would be
interested in sending them to a museum. I've spoken to the photographic
curator of a well-known local museum about these plates, and I doubt they
have the funds to undertake a restoration. Right now, I'm not certain how
restorable these actually are.
> Of course all you really want is a copy that you can use. So if you can
> get the plates separated, and scanned, your probably happy.
The plates are 5x7, and I don't have any scanning equipment that can handle
a plate that size. While there are scanners available that can do
transparencies larger than 4x6, these plates are very thick, and many are
very dense negatives, and wouldn't scan well anyway. I've been contact
printing the ones that weren't stuck together quite successfully, but they
sometimes need very long exposures with the lens aperture at f2.8 to print.
Derek