> > I finally shot some, and posted a few examples. Take a look if interested:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> Alliance Graphique Studio
> <http://www.allgstudio.com
> I plan to shoot a side by side comparison with VS, just so I can see the
> results on a light table. I don't think the V100F is bad film, but I'm
> dissappointed in the lack of sharpness.
Only checking under an 8x loupe, and scanning a few images, it appears to be
slightly less sharp than E100VS. However, I think some of this apparent
sharpness difference may be down to the lower contrast. The fact that the
Velvia 100F did so well with green areas of trees in shadow, while the E100VS
just showed shadow, may be some indication of a bias in the films.
> As far as color rendition goes,
> well, you find out what this stuff can do, and use it for its strengths,
> like we do with old Velvia. Also, I haven't had a chance to test it on any
> bright reds or deep greens. I've got another pro pack to burn through, so I
> guess we'll see.
My first test of this was afternoon shooting outside. The more shadow in the
shots, the lower the contrast. It might be a good idea to add 1/3 stop exposure
when shooting more in shadow with the Fuji film. The Kodak E100VS does much
better in this regard.
I think for green testing, perhaps the E100GX might make a better comparison
than E100VS. Either way, I still think the Fuji might be slightly better at
rendering green, though that has been a traditional Fuji strong point.
I also have some of the new Astia that Fuji gave me. I have not yet had a
chance to test this. Previously, I have used Kodachrome 64 or Ektachrome 64,
though again the E100GX, and sometimes the E200, are other choices. The
previous Astia was very good for Portrait use, especially with lighter skins
tones.
Ciao!
Gordon Moat
Alliance Graphique Studio
<http://www.allgstudio.com