Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / Digital Photo / May 2009

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

give it a rest kiddies

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ray - 18 May 2009 22:57 GMT
How about at least TRYING to act like intelligent adults for a while?
Quite obviously neither a P&S or a DSLR is going to be what everyone needs
- if that were so, then one or the other would die. You simply can't
accept the fact that different folks have different needs and let it go at
that!
Paul Heslop - 18 May 2009 23:10 GMT
> How about at least TRYING to act like intelligent adults for a while?
> Quite obviously neither a P&S or a DSLR is going to be what everyone needs
> - if that were so, then one or the other would die. You simply can't
> accept the fact that different folks have different needs and let it go at
> that!

some people have time on their hands and narrow views.
Signature

Paul  (We won't die of devotion)  
-------------------------------------------------------  
Stop and Look
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/

WW - 19 May 2009 02:53 GMT
> How about at least TRYING to act like intelligent adults for a while?
> Quite obviously neither a P&S or a DSLR is going to be what everyone needs
> - if that were so, then one or the other would die. You simply can't
> accept the fact that different folks have different needs and let it go at
> that!

Problem solved. I have both. WW
Bob Larter - 20 May 2009 07:48 GMT
>> How about at least TRYING to act like intelligent adults for a while?
>> Quite obviously neither a P&S or a DSLR is going to be what everyone needs
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Problem solved. I have both. WW

I used to, but I gave my P&S (Canon S30) to my sister. She's very happy
with it.

Signature

   W
 . | ,. w ,   "Some people are alive only because
  \|/  \|/     it is illegal to kill them."    Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

Bowser - 19 May 2009 13:13 GMT
> How about at least TRYING to act like intelligent adults for a while?
> Quite obviously neither a P&S or a DSLR is going to be what everyone needs
> - if that were so, then one or the other would die. You simply can't
> accept the fact that different folks have different needs and let it go at
> that!

Right. Asking us to be mature. Like asking a starving dog to refuse food.
ray - 19 May 2009 15:54 GMT
>> How about at least TRYING to act like intelligent adults for a while?
>> Quite obviously neither a P&S or a DSLR is going to be what everyone
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Right. Asking us to be mature. Like asking a starving dog to refuse
> food.

If you'll reread, you'll see that I was not asking folks to be mature - I
know that's way too much to ask. I merely requested that folks try to act
like adults for a while.
SMS - 19 May 2009 18:35 GMT
> If you'll reread, you'll see that I was not asking folks to be mature - I
> know that's way too much to ask. I merely requested that folks try to act
> like adults for a while.

I'm sorry, I had assumed that our friendly anti-DSLR troll had
disappeared, but it's just that my Usenet filters were working too well.

I didn't post that to bring him out of the woodwork, it was a legitimate
response to the thread on Sony launching a line of simple D-SLRs. The
reason they're doing this is because they believe that there are a lot
of point and shoot users out there that would like to have the
advantages of a D-SLR, but that feel that the current offerings are
overly complex to use.

Rather than just making their new D-SLRs simpler, they actually have to
explain to potential customers that these products will solve the major
areas of dissatisfaction with point and shoot digital cameras, as no
doubt most of us have explained to our friends and relatives.

The two biggest complaints of point and shoot cameras are the lag time
and the poor low-light performance. Neither of these problems were
present in point and shoot film cameras, and there is no technology to
fix the problems in point and shoot digital cameras. Hence, at this
time, going to a digital SLR is the only solution and the company that
can capitalize on this mass market will do well.
ray - 19 May 2009 19:33 GMT
>> If you'll reread, you'll see that I was not asking folks to be mature -
>> I know that's way too much to ask. I merely requested that folks try to
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> time, going to a digital SLR is the only solution and the company that
> can capitalize on this mass market will do well.

Getting a little off topic there, I think. The point is that I'm sick and
tired of all the bickering - all the arguments about: "16 reasons to
choose a DSLR over a P&S" which begets "25 reasons to choose a P&S over a
DSLR" which begets "37 reasons to choose a DSLR over a P&S" which begest
"51 reasons to choose a P&S over a DSLR" . . . And then all the incessant
"you're crazy - no one would want one of those damned things" . . . ad
naseum.
SMS - 19 May 2009 19:47 GMT
> Getting a little off topic there, I think. The point is that I'm sick and
> tired of all the bickering

LOL, if you don't like bickering, what are you doing on Usenet?!
Bowser - 19 May 2009 22:50 GMT
>>> If you'll reread, you'll see that I was not asking folks to be mature -
>>> I know that's way too much to ask. I merely requested that folks try to
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> "you're crazy - no one would want one of those damned things" . . . ad
> naseum.

So don't read the messages and don't extend the thread by replying. It's
pretty simple, no?
SneakyP - 29 May 2009 04:50 GMT
>> I'm sorry, I had assumed that our friendly anti-DSLR troll had
>> disappeared, but it's just that my Usenet filters were working too
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> all the incessant "you're crazy - no one would want one of those
> damned things" . . . ad naseum.

What they really want to say, but have a lack of resources and
intelligence to convey with is...

"I want a button on my head where whenever I push it the image that is
displayed on my eyeball rear wall is captured into my memory and I can
download that to my computer for later retrieval"

I wonder what kind of camera and lens will match the performance of the
human eyeball?

It's really simple - if they only could say that instead of the
"GREAT TASTE / LESS FILLING" troll whines.

Signature

SneakyP
To reply: newsgroup only, what's posted in ng stays in ng.

Some choose to swim in the potty bowl of nan-ae rather than flush it
down :0)

Chris Malcolm - 29 May 2009 10:09 GMT
> What they really want to say, but have a lack of resources and
> intelligence to convey with is...

> "I want a button on my head where whenever I push it the image that is
> displayed on my eyeball rear wall is captured into my memory and I can
> download that to my computer for later retrieval"

> I wonder what kind of camera and lens will match the performance of the
> human eyeball?

I wouldn't bother using a camera as bad as that even if it was cheap.

Signature

Chris Malcolm

Bowser - 19 May 2009 22:49 GMT
>>> How about at least TRYING to act like intelligent adults for a while?
>>> Quite obviously neither a P&S or a DSLR is going to be what everyone
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> know that's way too much to ask. I merely requested that folks try to act
> like adults for a while.

Ah, OK. Pretty much the same thing to me, though. I'll rephrase:

Right. Asking us to act like adults for a while. Like asking a starving dog
to refuse food.
Paul Heslop - 19 May 2009 23:59 GMT
> >> How about at least TRYING to act like intelligent adults for a while?
> >> Quite obviously neither a P&S or a DSLR is going to be what everyone
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> know that's way too much to ask. I merely requested that folks try to act
> like adults for a while.

definitely not asking for maturity then... I thought we were pretty
much acting as adults do nowadays.

Signature

Paul  (We won't die of devotion)  
-------------------------------------------------------  
Stop and Look
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.