Photo Forum / Digital Photography / Digital Photo / May 2008
Amateur Wedding Photography
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Barb - 13 May 2008 16:29 GMT I am writing this message for my sister, who has volunteered to photograph our niece's wedding. She is a marvelous amateur photographer, uses a Canon Digital Rebel and gets amazing shots. The niece is paying for the wedding herself and is on a tight budget, so my sister was glad to offer her services free of charge. She feels confident she can photograph all the outdoor shots, reception, etc., but is a little nervous about the actual church photography, largely because the wedding will be at 6PM and so the church lighting has her a little concerned. She is open to renting or borrowing or purchasing any lighting equipment she may need. I guess she could use any helpful words of advice from seasoned photographers. I am writing this message in earnest, and surely would appreciate sincere responses, as I have no wish to start any flame wars, etc. Thanks in advance for any 'light' you can shed.
George Kerby - 13 May 2008 16:50 GMT On 5/13/08 10:29 AM, in article e9d3ddaa-a75e-4ebc-bbb3-4f8bec9b11f2@24g2000hsh.googlegroups.com, "Barb" <sleibo@corecomm.net> wrote:
> I am writing this message for my sister, who has volunteered to > photograph our niece's wedding. She is a marvelous amateur [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > responses, as I have no wish to start any flame wars, etc. Thanks in > advance for any 'light' you can shed. Most churches will not allow such lighting equipment. Pro photogs use available. Tell her to bring a tripod since the exposure can be lengthily.
Allen - 13 May 2008 18:02 GMT > I am writing this message for my sister, who has volunteered to > photograph our niece's wedding. She is a marvelous amateur [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > responses, as I have no wish to start any flame wars, etc. Thanks in > advance for any 'light' you can shed. There was a very long thread on this about a year ago. You might check Google Groups and see if you can find it. Allen
peter - 13 May 2008 18:03 GMT >I am writing this message for my sister, who has volunteered to > photograph our niece's wedding. She is a marvelous amateur [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > responses, as I have no wish to start any flame wars, etc. Thanks in > advance for any 'light' you can shed. You can use google to find many guides to wedding photography tips and tricks. But one cannot expect to absorb all the tips and tricks just by reading them. It takes practices.
Whenever I'm asked to shoot a wedding, I always tell the couple I'm not a pro and they *need* to get at least one other photographer, amateur or pro. The last thing I want is to ruin a friendship because I screw up, got sick, or my equipment fail on the day.
If there is a wedding rehearsal at about the same time of day, it would be a good practice opportunity.
The photographer needs to know her equipment very well because there is no time to think when shooting a wedding. If she rents studio strobes, she may not even have time to set them up. She needs to have on-camera flash ready at all times (probably need a flash bracket and an external battery pack). An assistant to carry stuff, set up lighting, locate missing relatives, tear down lighting, watch her gear, ... is very very useful.
Do the couple want posed group shots or posed couple shots? Posing people in a pleasing manner is a whole new topic and something most amateur photographers have trouble with. Some photographers skirt the issue by declaring themselves photojournalist-style wedding photographers :)
bugbear - 14 May 2008 09:40 GMT > If there is a wedding rehearsal at about the same time of day, it would be a > good practice opportunity. Superb tip!
BugBear
Joseph Meehan - 13 May 2008 21:07 GMT In all due respect, no one is really prepared to do this the first time, unless they have been trained by a professional at real weddings.
There are so many things that can and do go wrong. The last person you really want to have this happen to would be a close friend or family member. There are a lot of tricks to the trade. For example, no matter how good your equipment is, it can and will fail right at the worse moment. No real professional is going to try and do a wedding with just one camera or flash etc.
I worked at a photo studio and even with experienced professionals we had some real problems. I also worked at a large Department Store. I was in the photo retail end, not the studio at the time. The President's daughter's wedding was being done by the store. Guess what... That *&$% professional decided to do that wedding drunk. No photos. The Mother of the bride knew me and asked what I might do. In that case it did not turn out totally bad. We got the negatives (this was 40 years ago) that anyone attending the wedding had. From those we ended up with a good, memorable, if not traditional, album.
However don't send your sister away. She has something that no professional has. She know the people there. Like those photos in the album from all those guest, she will have photos that not professional would know to take. For example, if Uncle Fred is seen dancing with his cousin Alma who he has not spoken to since that time 20 years ago when she ... Well that would be a tremendous photo. She also can back up that professional just encase he does the same thing that happened 40 years ago.
> I am writing this message for my sister, who has volunteered to > photograph our niece's wedding. She is a marvelous amateur [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > responses, as I have no wish to start any flame wars, etc. Thanks in > advance for any 'light' you can shed.
 Signature Joseph Meehan
Dia 's Muire duit
Ali - 13 May 2008 22:29 GMT Good post. I agree.
I think that good wedding photography is very under-estimated. To do it well is quite specialist and although you need decent equipment, there is so much more to it that this. Pressing the button is the easy part.
> In all due respect, no one is really prepared to do this the first > time, unless they have been trained by a professional at real weddings. [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] >> responses, as I have no wish to start any flame wars, etc. Thanks in >> advance for any 'light' you can shed. bugbear - 14 May 2008 12:39 GMT > Pressing the button is the easy part. Hereby nominated as rec.photo.digital quote of the week.
BugBear
Jürgen Exner - 13 May 2008 22:54 GMT > In all due respect, no one is really prepared to do this the first time, >unless they have been trained by a professional at real weddings. > > There are so many things that can and do go wrong. The last person you >really want to have this happen to would be a close friend or family member. With all due respect, but doesn't that also depend upon how much value the bride/groom attaches to the formalities? What is more important: the love between the two newlyweds or the 4-tier wedding cake, the gown, the tuxedo, and the perfect pictures? The last wedding I attended as best man I had to choose one of my older sport jackets to not outdress the groom. Yes, those weddings exist, too, and we don't know which style wedding this one is. If someone does place so much emphasis on the outward formalities, then yes, by all means, hire a professional photographer. And for the amateur: stay away as far as possible because you will be blamed for every shot you took and every shot you missed.
However if the choice is between photos taken with cell phone cameras and an amateur photographer with a somewhat decend camera, then I hope the amateur photographer will win hands down. It should just be _very_ clear to everyone upfront what the individual expectations are. And if there is any mismatch then don't do it.
In this context I can't find anything wrong with asking for additional advice from experienced photographers.
jue
Barb - 13 May 2008 23:46 GMT It's me again, the original poster. Everyone has given some wonderful suggestions, and I appreciate them. I think my sister has things nailed as far as the composition goes, an "eye" for a great shot, and probably a lot of the innate qualities that make a photographer great. She has an amazing knack for capturing the moment. What is making her shake is the actual wedding ceremony itself, and just making sure she gets some decent shots of some of the special moments, in lighting that may not be as favorable as what she is used to. As for the bride and groom - they are totally non-fussy, even tho the reception will be at a Country Club, and my sister and her family are laid back as well.
I had a fiasco at my own wedding a hundred years ago with a 'professional' photographer that took 47 photos of a good friend of mine who looked like Farah Faucett (who btw used to be pretty good looking!) and exactly one of my grandmother. So the amateur status of my sis doesn't bother me much, either, and I think if she had equipment failure or any other catastrophe, no one would be too upset except her. That said, any helpful hints that have worked for any of you would surely be taken to heart. Thanks again in advance for your time and interest! Barb
> > In all due respect, no one is really prepared to do this the first time, > >unless they have been trained by a professional at real weddings. [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > jue Atheist Chaplain - 14 May 2008 01:56 GMT It's me again, the original poster. Everyone has given some wonderful suggestions, and I appreciate them. I think my sister has things nailed as far as the composition goes, an "eye" for a great shot, and probably a lot of the innate qualities that make a photographer great. She has an amazing knack for capturing the moment. What is making her shake is the actual wedding ceremony itself, and just making sure she gets some decent shots of some of the special moments, in lighting that may not be as favorable as what she is used to. As for the bride and groom - they are totally non-fussy, even tho the reception will be at a Country Club, and my sister and her family are laid back as well.
I had a fiasco at my own wedding a hundred years ago with a 'professional' photographer that took 47 photos of a good friend of mine who looked like Farah Faucett (who btw used to be pretty good looking!) and exactly one of my grandmother. So the amateur status of my sis doesn't bother me much, either, and I think if she had equipment failure or any other catastrophe, no one would be too upset except her. That said, any helpful hints that have worked for any of you would surely be taken to heart. Thanks again in advance for your time and interest! Barb
On May 13, 4:54 pm, Jürgen Exner <jurge...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Joseph Meehan" <sligoNoSPAM...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > In all due respect, no one is really prepared to do this the first time, [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > jue To digest a couple of the suggestions made here, get someone to help the photographer, especially in the church, someone who knows everyone involved is probably best, they will act as a runner and to herd the wedding party for the formal shots, finding uncle Herb out the back etc as well as also carry a bag of spare gear.
On the spare gear front, borrow or rent a second camera complete with lenses, one the same as the photographer already has, so it will already be familiar to use, don't go changing lenses all the time, change cameras and have a different lens on each, also if one of the cameras fails, there is a backup. spare batteries are a must as well as spare memory cards, the more the better (this is why you need an assistant, someone has to carry all the gear while the photographer is taking shots.) Get a decent tripod for the Church shots, as has already been said, most Churches don't allow flash or extra lighting so the tripod will assist when long exposures are called for (avoid high ISO shots if possible as even from the best Professional class cameras, they can be noisy)
It might also help the photographer to practice posing groups of people for shots, (use friends and family) that way you can get an idea of what does and doesn't work. go the wedding rehearsal and look for places to take good shots, create a list of expected shots and then make sure they get ticked off, things like Bride and Groom signing the wedding register, first kiss at the alter, exchanging rings etc. etc. Talk to the priest, he has seen a lot of weddings and may be able to assist with good locations, and by asking, you will get the priest on side and having the person actually running the ceremony as a friend can only be good :-)
While I may not be an experienced wedding photographer per se, I was married to one for a while and acted as the gopher at most of the ones she shot ;-) hopefully some more tips may be forthcoming good luck :-)
 Signature "Calling Atheism a religion is like calling bald a hair color." Don Hirschberg
Robert Coe - 17 May 2008 17:40 GMT : It's me again, the original poster. Everyone has given some wonderful : suggestions, and I appreciate them. I think my sister has things [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] : at a Country Club, and my sister and her family are laid back as : well. In the overall context of things, failure to capture the ceremony may not be all that big a deal. Some churches don't allow photography during the ceremony anyway, or place such restrictions on it that good pictures are often hard to get, even for an experienced professional. If your sister gets good pictures after the ceremony and at the reception, that may be all that's required. (And as someone suggested, she should go to the rehearsal if possible. She may get some good pictures there, and at least it will be good practice.)
: I had a fiasco at my own wedding a hundred years ago with a : 'professional' photographer that took 47 photos of a good friend of [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] : you would surely be taken to heart. Thanks again in advance for your : time and interest! Barb I have an interesting situation coming up in a couple of weeks. Back when I was in college, one of my cousins got married. I had recently bought my first Nikon, and through some process I don't quite remember, I was designated the official photographer of the event. I did the best I could, shooting in B&W and making the prints myself. As I recall, they were adequate, although nothing to really brag about. The bride and groom liked them well enough, and I'm told they still have them.
Now a bit of time has passed, and my cousin and his wife are about to celebrate their 50th anniversary. My wife and I will be driving from Boston to Chicago for the occasion, hauling along our Canons and our collection of lenses. I expect the whole weekend to be a grand photo shoot, wherein I'll be competing, in a way, with the original wedding photographer, which was me. If my pictures of the anniversary parties, taken with modern digital equipment, aren't an order of magnitude better than those I took 50 years ago, I'll feel like a dope.
So tell your sister that if she does too good a job, she may just be providing retroactive competition for herself in the future!
Bob
Ali - 14 May 2008 00:05 GMT Another good post.
One point in particular that really hit the nail on the head, is that marriage is all about the love between two people. If people are unable to afford a GOOD professional photographer, then it isn't important, it really isn't. It's the marriage that's important.
If you can afford it, then these are the photos that will be shown to your children, grand children, great grand children, etc.
One thing to bear in mind though is that most people can drive a car and most think that they are a good driver. How would they do competing against a WRC, WTCC or F1 driver?
> With all due respect, but doesn't that also depend upon how much value > the bride/groom attaches to the formalities? What is more important: the [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > jue Shawn Hirn - 14 May 2008 02:01 GMT In article <e9d3ddaa-a75e-4ebc-bbb3-4f8bec9b11f2@24g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
> I am writing this message for my sister, who has volunteered to > photograph our niece's wedding. She is a marvelous amateur [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > responses, as I have no wish to start any flame wars, etc. Thanks in > advance for any 'light' you can shed. My advise. Don't do it! A professional photographer will get much better results. Your sister needs to realize she is offering to undertake a real job with a lot of responsibility and it is a hell of a lot of work. The bulk of the work occurs after the photo shooting is done, when she has to sit down at her computer and post-process the photos she wants to give the newlyweds.
I did this for my sister, and all I can say is, never again. Doing wedding photography when you are also attending the wedding as a guest is a real drudge. My sister loved the results, as did my parents and her in-laws, but I spent at least 200 hours AFTER the wedding working on the wedding album. I also didn't get to enjoy the wedding festivities at all because I was working.
If your sister must do this, she needs the help of at least one other photographer who has a good camera because there is no way one person can get all the shots that a wedding typically involves. Your sister also needs to rent lighting, and she needs to see the wedding venue before the wedding takes place and make a list of the photos the bride and groom want. There are numerous books on wedding photography. Your sister should read at least one of them.
George Kerby - 14 May 2008 02:44 GMT Why am I the ONLY one who gave her real advice? The rest of you have gotten into a mindless dissertation.
On 5/13/08 8:01 PM, in article srhi-B8304F.21012313052008@newsgroups.comcast.net, "Shawn Hirn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote:
> In article > <e9d3ddaa-a75e-4ebc-bbb3-4f8bec9b11f2@24g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > and groom want. There are numerous books on wedding photography. Your > sister should read at least one of them. Shawn Hirn - 14 May 2008 03:18 GMT > Why am I the ONLY one who gave her real advice? The rest of you have gotten > into a mindless dissertation. To each his own. I related my own personal experience with doing amateur wedding photography and if you read my posting, you would see that I did provide some advice.
Mr. Strat - 14 May 2008 03:34 GMT > Why am I the ONLY one who gave her real advice? The rest of you have gotten > into a mindless dissertation. I've had it with these idiots. You can tell them until you're blue in the face, and they'll go ahead and shoot it anyway.
But when it's all over, and they've screwed up a once-in-a-lifetime event, you can say, "See, I told you so."
George Kerby - 14 May 2008 19:31 GMT On 5/13/08 9:34 PM, in article 130520081934067189%rag@nospam.techline.com,
>> Why am I the ONLY one who gave her real advice? The rest of you have gotten >> into a mindless dissertation. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > But when it's all over, and they've screwed up a once-in-a-lifetime > event, you can say, "See, I told you so." Not me. I tend to try to help, but it's so frustrating at times...
Robert Coe - 17 May 2008 18:13 GMT : On 5/13/08 8:01 PM, in article : srhi-B8304F.21012313052008@newsgroups.comcast.net, "Shawn Hirn" [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] : Why am I the ONLY one who gave her real advice? The rest of you have gotten : into a mindless dissertation. You're joking, right? Shawn made some potentially helpful suggestions. All you did was remind her to bring a tripod. Bob
Robert Coe - 17 May 2008 18:07 GMT : In article : <e9d3ddaa-a75e-4ebc-bbb3-4f8bec9b11f2@24g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] : wedding album. I also didn't get to enjoy the wedding festivities at all : because I was working. Good lord, man! You didn't "enjoy the wedding festivities"? Unless you were trying to pick up one of the bridesmaids, what possible difference does that make? Weddings are for the bride and groom (and their parents); the guests are merely props. With 200+ hours of work, you pleased your parents and gave your sister a fine wedding present. In the fullness of time, you may come to regard it as some of the most satisfying work you ever did.
Anyway, your advice comes too late; Barb's sister is already on the hook.
: If your sister must do this, she needs the help of at least one other : photographer who has a good camera because there is no way one person [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] : and groom want. There are numerous books on wedding photography. Your : sister should read at least one of them. Excellent advice. But if she doesn't manage to get to any of it, the world won't end.
Bob
DD - 14 May 2008 11:03 GMT I have taken wedding photographs for friends who did not have the means to hire a professional and in each situation I got no criticism and a lot of praise! I must say that this was in the 60's and they were all film cameras then. I did not have a very good camera, a Japanese "Echoflex" which was a Rollei copy but it produced some really good photographs. My main issues were:
1) I did not always know how to set up the group photographs because it was rare that I knew everyone in the wedding group. I would suggest that the groups and the relative positions of the various family members is agreed before the day.
2) Another problem I encountered was that when I had a group composed and I was about to take a photograph, I was hindered by people among the guests who would wait until I was ready and start taking their own photographs. This was eventually overcome by the simple act of leaving an old wooden tripod in front of the group until the last minute. Nobody wants a tripod in their photograph! After taking all the photographs you want, it is a good idea to invite the guests to take their own photographs. Once they get the idea it is sometimes possible to forget about the tripod.
3) I always took at least four photographs of groups because there is always someone making a funny face, looking the wrong way or with their eyes closed! I always used to warn the group that I was going to take a lot of photographs and sometimes I faked the first few to get attention and natural expressions.
4) If there are children to be photographed in a group, do those groups first and if there are individual or groups of children, try to do the photographs before the adult groups and preferably away from the guests.
5) Photographs taken in the church were always taken with flash, a slave flash near and to one side adds a bit of shadow and helps to bring out the details of the brides dress. I used to calculate my exposures from light readings taken from the bride because the first thing that the bride will look for is the detail of the dress!
6) Lastly, it is a good idea to have someone to help get the groups set up and give you time to think about the next move. The faster the photography is done, the more successful the shoot will be and the happier everyone will be.
Hope this helps, Oh by the way look out for wine glasses, they can spoil a photograph, either in the hand of a group member or just sitting innocently on a table nearby.
DD
> I am writing this message for my sister, who has volunteered to > photograph our niece's wedding. She is a marvelous amateur [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > responses, as I have no wish to start any flame wars, etc. Thanks in > advance for any 'light' you can shed. bugbear - 14 May 2008 12:37 GMT > I used to calculate my exposures from > light readings taken from the bride because the first thing that the > bride will look for is the detail of the dress! Watch out for contrast (dynamic range)
A bride in white next to a groom in black is a tricky scene, and rather common.
I saw a (pro) photographer take a photo of the B&G (as above) from inside the church, backlit by full sun from the open porch door.
He was a brave man!
BugBear
peter - 14 May 2008 16:33 GMT Please post the results/experience of your sister shooting her first wedding.
George Kerby - 14 May 2008 19:32 GMT On 5/14/08 10:33 AM, in article bDDWj.1573$i51.827@trndny09, "peter" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
> Please post the results/experience of your sister shooting her first > wedding. It ain't gonna be pretty, I tell ya...
http://www.slideshare.net/ericptak/wedding-on-bayou-lafouche
Joseph Meehan - 14 May 2008 20:35 GMT In all due respect, no one is really prepared to do this the first time, unless they have been trained by a professional at real weddings.
There are so many things that can and do go wrong. The last person you really want to have this happen to would be a close friend or family member. There are a lot of tricks to the trade. For example, no matter how good your equipment is, it can and will fail right at the worse moment. No real professional is going to try and do a wedding with just one camera or flash etc.
I worked at a photo studio and even with experienced professionals we had some real problems. I also worked at a large Department Store. I was in the photo retail end, not the studio at the time. The President's daughter's wedding was being done by the store. Guess what... That *&$% professional decided to do that wedding drunk. No photos. The Mother of the bride knew me and asked what I might do. In that case it did not turn out totally bad. We got the negatives (this was 40 years ago) that anyone attending the wedding had. From those we ended up with a good, memorable, if not traditional, album.
However don't send your sister away. She has something that no professional has. She know the people there. Like those photos in the album from all those guest, she will have photos that not professional would know to take. For example, if Uncle Fred is seen dancing with his cousin Alma who he has not spoken to since that time 20 years ago when she ... Well that would be a tremendous photo. She also can back up that professional just encase he does the same thing that happened 40 years ago.
> I am writing this message for my sister, who has volunteered to > photograph our niece's wedding. She is a marvelous amateur [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > responses, as I have no wish to start any flame wars, etc. Thanks in > advance for any 'light' you can shed.
 Signature Joseph Meehan
Dia 's Muire duit
George Kerby - 15 May 2008 00:15 GMT On 5/14/08 2:35 PM, in article 482b3f00$0$7079$4c368faf@roadrunner.com,
> In all due respect, no one is really prepared to do this the first time, > unless they have been trained by a professional at real weddings. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > daughter's wedding was being done by the store. Guess what... That *&$% > professional decided to do that wedding drunk. That last statement indicated that whoever was hired to do the photography was *anything* but a Professional. While not on the same scale as a surgeon, or a pilot doing their jobs while inebriated, it is *NOT* "professional".
When I was doing wedding work (1970-early80's), I would not even have a customary glass of champagne offered me until the bride & groom were on their way off in the honeymoon-mobile.
C J Campbell - 17 May 2008 18:57 GMT > I am writing this message for my sister, who has volunteered to > photograph our niece's wedding. She is a marvelous amateur [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > responses, as I have no wish to start any flame wars, etc. Thanks in > advance for any 'light' you can shed. My advice would be to check with the venue and see if any lighting equipment is even allowed. Some churches attempt to prohibit photography entirely.
There are reasons wedding photographers charge several thousand dollars for an event. Event photography represents an enormous expenditure of time, not only at the event itself, but in preparing for it. Experience is worth a lot, too. Your sister is attempting to do something for which a pro would require at least one assistant, a great deal more equipment than your sister has, several days of preparation, and extensive interviews with the couple.
Well, okay. Most pros have to admit they started out like your sister. Robert T. Williams is one of the most highly paid wedding photographers in the country. It wasn't that many years ago he charged $100 for his first wedding. It didn't even pay for his film and the cost of development. He learned his lessons the hard way.
Your sister will need an assistant, preferably one who has a camera of her own. The assistant, when not doing the thousands of chores needing to be done so that the photographer can actually take pictures, will be taking detail shots and secondary views, backing up the photographer in case anything goes wrong. If the photographer misses it, maybe the assistant will get it.
Your sister should plan the shots she wants to take as far in advance of the wedding as possible, scouting the venue for good locations as well as familiarizing herself with the local area for unusual settings, quickest routes to and from the church, etc.
She should plan on arriving early to get set up and to take test shots. If she wants that shot from the choir seats looking over the audience she needs to get into position before people start coming into the chapel -- and the assistant needs to be posted at the door to cover the doors and aisles.
What is she going to do with the pictures? Burn them to a CD and hand them to the bride? Do you know what happens when you do that? The bride usually has no idea what to do with the CD. She ends up taking it to Costco and having a few of the pictures printed to 5x7. No album, no real mementos, and no real clear idea of how to create them.
 Signature Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor
|
|
|