Going to a dusty place on holiday in the morning. Don't want to change lens
on my D80 whilst out there. Recovered my Nikon F60 from the attic and are
thinking of using that with the SIGMA 12-24mmD DG HSM.
What are the likely results going to be?
Jürgen Exner - 09 May 2008 07:54 GMT
> [Subject: digital lens]
There ain't no such thing as a digital lens. All lenses are purely
optical, no 'digital' involved in the processing of the image at all.
>Going to a dusty place on holiday in the morning. Don't want to change lens
>on my D80 whilst out there. Recovered my Nikon F60 from the attic and are
>thinking of using that with the SIGMA 12-24mmD DG HSM.
Is this a full frame or a reduced image circle lens?
>What are the likely results going to be?
If it is a full frame lens then you shouldn't have any problems.
If it is a reduced image circle lens then you will probably have at
least some vignetting at at least some focal lengths.
jue
nicholas - 09 May 2008 08:25 GMT
>> [Subject: digital lens]
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> jue
Hi,not sure about the meaning of image circle lens/full frame lens, however,
the lens is described as being suitable for a full frame camera.
Alex Monro - 09 May 2008 10:14 GMT
> Hi,not sure about the meaning of image circle lens/full frame lens,
> however, the lens is described as being suitable for a full frame
> camera.
Yes, the DG part of the lens designation is Sigma's notation for a lens
having full 24x36mm frame coverage, together with improved coatings to
reduce flare and ghosting when used with digital sensors.
It should work fine with your F60.

Signature
Alex Monro
Exeter, UK
Running on Linux (Kubuntu 7.1)
George Kerby - 09 May 2008 14:47 GMT
On 5/9/08 1:32 AM, in article ANudnW1GwoJncr7VRVnyiQA@bt.com, "nicholas"
> Going to a dusty place on holiday in the morning. Don't want to change lens
> on my D80 whilst out there. Recovered my Nikon F60 from the attic and are
> thinking of using that with the SIGMA 12-24mmD DG HSM.
>
> What are the likely results going to be?
The word "Sigma" equates with fecal matter.
And you claim 63+ years of expertise?
Yoshi - 09 May 2008 20:16 GMT
> The word "Sigma" equates with fecal matter.
>
> And you claim 63+ years of expertise?
No, I think the description "fecal matter" more aptly describes your reply.
George Kerby - 09 May 2008 21:53 GMT
On 5/9/08 2:16 PM, in article 4824a328$0$30522$4c368faf@roadrunner.com,
>> The word "Sigma" equates with fecal matter.
>>
>> And you claim 63+ years of expertise?
>
> No, I think the description "fecal matter" more aptly describes your reply.
Well, you *are* the scat expert.
Yoshi - 10 May 2008 04:06 GMT
> On 5/9/08 2:16 PM, in article 4824a328$0$30522$4c368faf@roadrunner.com,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>
> Well, you *are* the scat expert.
You introduced the subject. You are obviously fanscinated by it. Now shut
up before I have you removed from usenet.
George Kerby - 11 May 2008 15:48 GMT
On 5/9/08 10:06 PM, in article 4825111d$0$4067$4c368faf@roadrunner.com,
>> On 5/9/08 2:16 PM, in article 4824a328$0$30522$4c368faf@roadrunner.com,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> You introduced the subject. You are obviously fanscinated by it. Now shut
> up before I have you removed from usenet.
Whoa. I must have struck a nerve with Smegma-Boy! OK, Yoda, blow hard now...
John Turco - 10 May 2008 20:00 GMT
> On 5/9/08 1:32 AM, in article ANudnW1GwoJncr7VRVnyiQA@bt.com, "nicholas"
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> And you claim 63+ years of expertise?
Hello, George:
The original poster ("nicholas" <nicholas@spammehere.com>), in this thread, is
NOT who you think he is (i.e., Nicholas <Nicholas@nowhere.net>).
Don't believe me? Then, check their respective headers, and you'll see that
"nicholas" (lowercase spelling) is British, whereas "Nicholas" is American.
Besides, "nicholas" has come off as a somewhat polite poster, or haven't you
noticed?
Cordially,
John Turco <jtur@concentric.net>
Ray Fischer - 15 May 2008 12:46 GMT
>> Going to a dusty place on holiday in the morning. Don't want to change lens
>> on my D80 whilst out there. Recovered my Nikon F60 from the attic and are
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
>The word "Sigma" equates with fecal matter.
^^^^^
You misspelled "kerby".

Signature
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
George Kerby - 15 May 2008 18:22 GMT
On 5/15/08 6:46 AM, in article 482c228b$0$34525$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net,
>>> Going to a dusty place on holiday in the morning. Don't want to change lens
>>> on my D80 whilst out there. Recovered my Nikon F60 from the attic and are
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> ^^^^^
> You misspelled "kerby".
And you would be the one with a piece of crap lens and not know any better.
Moron.
BTW:That's "Mister Kerby" with a capital "K" to you, boy!
XxYyZz - 09 May 2008 15:31 GMT
> Going to a dusty place on holiday in the morning. Don't want to change lens
> on my D80 whilst out there. Recovered my Nikon F60 from the attic and are
> thinking of using that with the SIGMA 12-24mmD DG HSM.
>
> What are the likely results going to be?
I'm surprised that you don't know the answer to that already! To quote you
from another post: "I am 63+ and have spent my entire LIFE in photography at
all levels of the practice. My little finger contains more knowledge about
photography than Coe has in his entire body."
John Turco - 10 May 2008 20:00 GMT
> > Going to a dusty place on holiday in the morning. Don't want to change lens
> > on my D80 whilst out there. Recovered my Nikon F60 from the attic and are
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> all levels of the practice. My little finger contains more knowledge about
> photography than Coe has in his entire body."
Hello, XxYyZz:
Nope, you're mistaken, as "nicholas" <nicholas@spammehere.com> and Nicholas
<Nicholas@nowhere.net> aren't the same person.
(Please, see my earlier reply to George Kerby <ghost_topper@hotmail.com>,
for further info.)
Cordially,
John Turco <jtur@concentric.net>
Paul Furman - 12 May 2008 00:56 GMT
> Going to a dusty place on holiday in the morning. Don't want to change lens
> on my D80 whilst out there. Recovered my Nikon F60 from the attic and are
> thinking of using that with the SIGMA 12-24mmD DG HSM.
>
> What are the likely results going to be?
Post the results, this should be fun with that lens on full frame!

Signature
Paul Furman
www.edgehill.net
www.baynatives.com
all google groups messages filtered due to spam