 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / Digital Photography / Digital Photo / May 2008LOOKOUT, IT'S THE TOTALLY DIGITAL D60!
That would be the Totally Digital INFRARED D60, dontcha know! http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/96249811/original > That would be the Totally Digital INFRARED D60, dontcha know! > > http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/96249811/original Beautiful tones and contrasts that only IR can give! Good balance between the foreground and the background. With the cars mirror in sight, this could be a great example for the upcoming SI "point of view". Stunning work Bret! Helen > Stunning work Bret! > Helen God, you are so sickening. If he took a pic of a black wall at midnight you'd think it was stunning too > >> Stunning work Bret! >> Helen > > God, you are so sickening. If he took a pic of a black wall at > midnight you'd think it was stunning too. Stop it. You are hurting the cross dressing pervert's feelings. The deviant has multiple female personae here. 'He' also steals other's work and passes it off as his own. I know this, because he did this to me. It was a Christmas Manger Scene, of all things. No class whatever. mike > That would be the Totally Digital INFRARED D60, dontcha know! > > http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/96249811/original Did you do an IR conversion using a filter from LifePixel? I want to convert my old dslr, but I'm not happy with the US$145 & $40 freight per filter cost. > >http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/96249811/original > > Did you do an IR conversion using a filter from LifePixel? > I want to convert my old dslr, but I'm not happy with the US$145 & $40 > freight per filter cost. LifePixel converted my D60 to infrared. >>> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/96249811/original >> Did you do an IR conversion using a filter from LifePixel? >> I want to convert my old dslr, but I'm not happy with the US$145 & $40 >> freight per filter cost. > > LifePixel converted my D60 to infrared. I'm looking at blowing a tax refund on a 40D... maybe I should send these guys my Digital Rebel :) > > LifePixel converted my D60 to infrared. > > I'm looking at blowing a tax refund on a 40D... maybe I should send > these guys my Digital Rebel :) Why not? It's a good way to get use out of a camera that will otherwise sit on a shelf gathering dust. >>> LifePixel converted my D60 to infrared. >> I'm looking at blowing a tax refund on a 40D... maybe I should send >> these guys my Digital Rebel :) > > Why not? It's a good way to get use out of a camera that will > otherwise sit on a shelf gathering dust. Well, I have a potential buyer for it... waiting to see what she'll offer, whether I decide to sell it or convert it :) >> LifePixel converted my D60 to infrared. > > I'm looking at blowing a tax refund on a 40D... maybe I should send > these guys my Digital Rebel :) You would be better off getting a used D70 since it has less noise and sharper images than the 40D. Rita  SignatureStamping out Internet stupidity one idiot at a time. Never empower the idiot, embrace it and stimulate it. For more details go to the Usenet Stimulus Project page. http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com >>> LifePixel converted my D60 to infrared. >> >> I'm looking at blowing a tax refund on a 40D... maybe I should send >> these guys my Digital Rebel :) > >You would be better off getting a used D70 since it has less noise and You've blown your credibility, troll. SignatureRay Fischer rfischer@sonic.net > >You would be better off getting a used D70 since it has less noise and > > You've blown your credibility, troll. What credibility? Surely, nobody believes any of Rita's bullshit. >>>> LifePixel converted my D60 to infrared. >>> I'm looking at blowing a tax refund on a 40D... maybe I should send >>> these guys my Digital Rebel :) >> You would be better off getting a used D70 since it has less noise and > > You've blown your credibility, troll. Ray, I'm sure you didn't mean to say the above. For someone to blow their credibility they have to have credibility in the first place. Cheers, Alan > >>>> LifePixel converted my D60 to infrared. > >>> I'm looking at blowing a tax refund on a 40D... maybe I should send [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Cheers, > Alan Hello, Alan: Quite true! The words "credibility" and "troll" don't belong in the same sentence...how could there ever be a "credible troll," eh? Naturally, "incredible troll" works just fine, and can easily be applied to Rita Berkowitz and her ilk. :-J Cordially, John Turco <jtur@concentric.net> >>> LifePixel converted my D60 to infrared. >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > You would be better off getting a used D70 since it has less noise and > sharper images than the 40D. It also won't work with my existing collection of Canon lenses, flashes, and accessories. >>> I'm looking at blowing a tax refund on a 40D... maybe I should send >>> these guys my Digital Rebel :) [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > It also won't work with my existing collection of Canon lenses, > flashes, and accessories. Maybe it's time to sell off those unwanted accessories and go totally Nikon? With Nikon you will get better lenses as well as a superior flash system. The good thing is with Nikon you can always use these items on any future Canon dSLR body. If you must stick with Canon you should get the 1D Mk III and skip the 40D as it hasn't been perfected yet. Rita SignatureStamping out Internet stupidity one idiot at a time. Never empower the idiot, embrace it and stimulate it. For more details go to the Usenet Stimulus Project page. http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com On 4/29/08 7:34 AM, in article F92dnTLoWr9qiIrVnZ2dnUVZ_ryqnZ2d@supernews.com, "Rita Berkowitz" <ritaberk2008@aol.com> wrote: >>>> I'm looking at blowing a tax refund on a 40D... maybe I should send >>>> these guys my Digital Rebel :) [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Canon dSLR body. If you must stick with Canon you should get the 1D Mk III > and skip the 40D as it hasn't been perfected yet. Sorta like "Monkey Boy" claiming that Vista is a "work in progress", eh 'Rita'? >>> It also won't work with my existing collection of Canon lenses, >>> flashes, and accessories. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Sorta like "Monkey Boy" claiming that Vista is a "work in progress", > eh 'Rita'? What's Vista? Rita SignatureStamping out Internet stupidity one idiot at a time. Never empower the idiot, embrace it and stimulate it. For more details go to the Usenet Stimulus Project page. http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com >>>> It also won't work with my existing collection of Canon lenses, >>>> flashes, and accessories. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > What's Vista? Boy you are lucky Frankie Crankie hehehe..LOL! did not rip you up for that one. I think the moron would not like that. > Rita >>>> It also won't work with my existing collection of Canon lenses, >>>> flashes, and accessories. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > What's Vista? What's Nikon? >>>>> It also won't work with my existing collection of Canon lenses, >>>>> flashes, and accessories. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > What's Nikon? What's "Rita"? >>>>>> It also won't work with my existing collection of Canon lenses, >>>>>> flashes, and accessories. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > What's "Rita"? THAT is the $64,000 question, now isn't it? >>>> I'm looking at blowing a tax refund on a 40D... maybe I should send >>>> these guys my Digital Rebel :) [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Maybe it's time to sell off those unwanted accessories and go totally > Nikon? If they were unwanted, I'd do that. They're not. > With Nikon you will get better lenses as well as a superior flash system. > The good thing is with Nikon you can always use these items on any future > Canon dSLR body. If you must stick with Canon you should get the 1D Mk III > and skip the 40D as it hasn't been perfected yet. I'd love to... you gonna cover the price difference? Because you know, $4700 vs $1300 is just a WEE LITTLE bit more, and since the tax refund is just about $1300, well, that kinda makes that decision for me, doesn't it? But hey, if you'll pay the overage, why should I stop with a 1D-III? Why not just go to the 1Ds-III?? Got an extra $7G's to send me?? >> Maybe it's time to sell off those unwanted accessories and go totally >> Nikon? > > If they were unwanted, I'd do that. They're not. That's what happens when you get emotionally attached to your gear and don't follow the 18-month rule. You think you want it, but deep down inside you know you have to cut your losses to get a superior Nikon system. >> With Nikon you will get better lenses as well as a superior flash >> system. The good thing is with Nikon you can always use these items [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > refund is just about $1300, well, that kinda makes that decision for > me, doesn't it? Well, Bush is also giving you a $1,200 stimulus check. Take that and your refund and put it towards a Mk III next week when you get paid. > But hey, if you'll pay the overage, why should I stop with a 1D-III? > Why not just go to the 1Ds-III?? Got an extra $7G's to send me?? I wouldn't put you through the misery of suffering with a 1Ds. The 1D Mk III kills it in every category for half the price. Rita SignatureStamping out Internet stupidity one idiot at a time. Never empower the idiot, embrace it and stimulate it. For more details go to the Usenet Stimulus Project page. http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com >That's what happens when you get emotionally attached to your gear and don't >follow the 18-month rule. Gee, it's good that YOU would never get emotionally attached to your gear. After all, you might start spewing all sorts of stupid and dishonest claims about Canon and/or Nikon. SignatureRay Fischer rfischer@sonic.net >> That's what happens when you get emotionally attached to your gear and don't >> follow the 18-month rule. > > Gee, it's good that YOU would never get emotionally attached to your > gear. After all, you might start spewing all sorts of stupid and > dishonest claims about Canon and/or Nikon. We know she's emotionally attached to her Nikon camera straps... >> Gee, it's good that YOU would never get emotionally attached to your >> gear. After all, you might start spewing all sorts of stupid and >> dishonest claims about Canon and/or Nikon. > > We know she's emotionally attached to her Nikon camera straps... Damn straight, Skippy! The Nikon strap is a work of art as well as a feat in engineering to create such utter perfection. Rita SignatureStamping out Internet stupidity one idiot at a time. Never empower the idiot, embrace it and stimulate it. For more details go to the Usenet Stimulus Project page. http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com >>> Maybe it's time to sell off those unwanted accessories and go totally >>> Nikon? [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > follow the 18-month rule. You think you want it, but deep down inside you > know you have to cut your losses to get a superior Nikon system. If your pictures are any indication, I have yet to see anything "superior" to my parents' old 3MP Kodak P&S. >>> With Nikon you will get better lenses as well as a superior flash >>> system. The good thing is with Nikon you can always use these items [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Well, Bush is also giving you a $1,200 stimulus check. Take that and your > refund and put it towards a Mk III next week when you get paid. Really? I was unaware that Canadians were to be beneficiaries of this little scam... and even if we were, that would still leave me barely halfway there, so... pony up! >> Well, Bush is also giving you a $1,200 stimulus check. Take that >> and your refund and put it towards a Mk III next week when you get [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > little scam... and even if we were, that would still leave me barely > halfway there, so... pony up! Hell, America has been subsidizing the fucken' Canucks for the last 125 years. Whatever type of welfare they give you guys up there you can be assured America is paying for it. Your health care system is 80% funded by US taxpayers. Rita SignatureStamping out Internet stupidity one idiot at a time. Never empower the idiot, embrace it and stimulate it. For more details go to the Usenet Stimulus Project page. http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com >Hell, America has been subsidizing the fucken' Canucks for the last 125 >years. Whatever type of welfare they give you guys up there you can be >assured America is paying for it. Your health care system is 80% funded by >US taxpayers. Idiot, troll, or liar. SignatureRay Fischer rfischer@sonic.net > >Hell, America has been subsidizing the fucken' Canucks for the last 125 > >years. Whatever type of welfare they give you guys up there you can be > >assured America is paying for it. Your health care system is 80% funded by > >US taxpayers. > > Idiot, troll, or liar. How about "All 3?" You win the jackpot. > That would be the Totally Digital INFRARED D60, dontcha know! > > http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/96249811/original Being in the right place at the right time is what is needed to get that one great shot. Weither it is in IR, color or B&W, knowing your subject or location is what gets the shot. Good going Bret. Draco > >http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/96249811/original > > Being in the right place at the right time is what is needed to get > that one great shot. Weither it is in IR, color or B&W, knowing your > subject or location is what gets the shot. I can't tell you how many hours I've spent standing at the right place, but at the wrong time. > I can't tell you how many hours I've spent standing at the right > place, but at the wrong time. Ans some people just happen to drive by Hernandez NM at exactly the correct time! Doug McDonald On Apr 28, 9:59 am, u...@domain.invalid wrote: > > I can't tell you how many hours I've spent standing at the right > > place, but at the wrong time. > > Ans some people just happen to drive by Hernandez NM at exactly the > correct time! One of the great joys in photography is when the photo comes to you rather than going to it. Almost all of my better shots happened when I was out trying to shoot something else. (I'm talking more about wildlife than landscape photography, here.) With landscapes you just have to go when the light is right so that isn't much of a challenge. The thing I like most about shooting infrared is that it works best when the sun is high in the sky, usually the worst time for conventional photography. What I was talking about earlier was staking out the perfect flower for hours, hoping that a hummingbird would hit it. Or hoping that elusive Kingfisher will land on that one stump in the water with the perfect background. Or setting up on that stormy sky and trying to time the lightning. Those are the shots that are hard to get, but yield the most satisfaction to me. I guess what I'm saying is that anybody can take a pic of Mt. Rushmore, The Grand Canyon, Yosemite, or birds on a feeder. Getting the unique photo is the ultimate challenge. Now excuse me while I go work on my infrared macro stereograms taken at night. On 4/28/08 8:55 AM, in article 7ed3c70a-025d-4f86-a08a-e22b30c0606f@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com, >>> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/96249811/original >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > I can't tell you how many hours I've spent standing at the right > place, but at the wrong time. Looks like you were *sitting* at the right place with this one... > I can't tell you how many hours I've spent standing at the right > place, but at the wrong time. Getting charged with prostitution happens all the time, you cross dressing pervert. They weren't singling YOU out of the crowd, despite what your bloated ego tells you. Stolen any more pictures lately? mike > > >http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/96249811/original > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > I can't tell you how many hours I've spent standing at the right > place, but at the wrong time. I agree. There are lots of times when I drive by a place and the weather is wrong or the time of day is wrong or ect. ect. It takes perseverance to find and be at the right place at the right time. OR just plain dumb luck as noted by Doug McDonald.hehe Had a few of those myself. But no camera was involved.hehe Draco |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.