 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / Digital Photography / Digital Photo / May 2008Something Canon Shooters Wished They Had!!
A Nikon D3 with Nikkors so they can get razor sharp imaged and super tight DoF they can cut themselves on. Hell, most Canon shooters are happy to have something that resembles focus. Anyway, a trip to the salon today, a new hairdo, attire, and I'm strutting my stuff! I even started working on my tan. It's going to be a super great summer!!!! <http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com/sharp_dressed.htm> Rita  SignatureStamping out Internet stupidity one idiot at a time. Never empower the idiot, embrace it and stimulate it. For more details go to the Usenet Stimulus Project page. http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com >A Nikon D3 with Nikkors so they can get razor sharp imaged and super tight >DoF they can cut themselves on. Hell, most Canon shooters are happy to have How much is Nikon paying you, troll? SignatureRay Fischer rfischer@sonic.net >> A Nikon D3 with Nikkors so they can get razor sharp imaged and super tight >> DoF they can cut themselves on. Hell, most Canon shooters are happy to have > > How much is Nikon paying you, troll? Answering the question in the title of the thread: A nickel for every time Rita has made a fool of itself. Allen ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** >A Nikon D3 with Nikkors so they can get razor sharp imaged and super tight >DoF they can cut themselves on. Hell, most Canon shooters are happy to have [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >Rita Is the "super tight DoF" the reason why the tail feathers aren't in focus? And why do the rump feathers have the same amount of blur as the background? TR > >A Nikon D3 with Nikkors so they can get razor sharp imaged and super tight > >DoF they can cut themselves on. Hell, most Canon shooters are happy to have [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > focus? And why do the rump feathers have the same amount of blur as > the background? Perhaps motion blur caused by the bird not standing still? SignatureAlfred Molon ------------------------------ Olympus 50X0, 8080, E3X0, E4X0, E5X0 and E3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site >> A Nikon D3 with Nikkors so they can get razor sharp imaged and super >> tight DoF they can cut themselves on. Hell, most Canon shooters are [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > focus? And why do the rump feathers have the same amount of blur as > the background? You must be a Canon shooter content with mediocrity and poor optics? That was a head shot not an a.s shot. Rita SignatureStamping out Internet stupidity one idiot at a time. Never empower the idiot, embrace it and stimulate it. For more details go to the Usenet Stimulus Project page. http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com On 4/27/08 6:40 AM, in article NK6dnQwIBdih-onVnZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d@supernews.com, "Rita Berkowitz" <ritaberk2008@aol.com> wrote: >>> A Nikon D3 with Nikkors so they can get razor sharp imaged and super >>> tight DoF they can cut themselves on. Hell, most Canon shooters are [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > You must be a Canon shooter content with mediocrity and poor optics? That > was a head shot not an a.s shot. In your case, there is a difference? >A Nikon D3 with Nikkors so they can get razor sharp imaged and super tight That's the way, keep posting your self-serving utter rubbish where it belongs, along with all the other utter rubbish posted by the Chinese. You're right where you belong you f.cking moron. >A Nikon D3 with Nikkors About as good as the fake Rolexes your only friends here post about. You're certainly posting in the right NG, right there next to all the other scheiss. > A Nikon D3 with Nikkors so they can get razor sharp imaged and super tight > DoF they can cut themselves on. Hell, most Canon shooters are happy to have > something that resembles focus. Anyway, a trip to the salon today, a new > hairdo, attire, and I'm strutting my stuff! I even started working on my > tan. It's going to be a super great summer!!!! Your enthusiasm for your Nikon D3 is amusing. We Canon users do manage to get along fine without a Nikon D3. In my opinion, its not so much the camera, as the person using it, that's most important in terms of taking interesting photos. A good photographer can shoot nice photos with any reasonably good camera, regardless of who manufactured it, and that includes P&S cameras. So, Rita? Are you a good photographer? > Rita? Are you a good photographer? Hell no, I just play one on Usenet! Rita SignatureStamping out Internet stupidity one idiot at a time. Never empower the idiot, embrace it and stimulate it. For more details go to the Usenet Stimulus Project page. http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com >> Rita? Are you a good photographer? > > Hell no, I just play one on Usenet! I bet you use a Mac as well. John. >>> Rita? Are you a good photographer? >> >> Hell no, I just play one on Usenet! > > I bet you use a Mac as well. Hell no! A Mac is for idiots! Rita SignatureStamping out Internet stupidity one idiot at a time. Never empower the idiot, embrace it and stimulate it. For more details go to the Usenet Stimulus Project page. http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com > >>> Rita? Are you a good photographer? > >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Hell no! A Mac is for idiots! No way. We Mac users just like to get work done on our computers rather than having to be paranoid about malware and installing updates every time there's a day with an even number in it like Windows users do. On 4/27/08 7:59 AM, in article srhi-5EC9FE.08594627042008@newsgroups.comcast.net, "Shawn Hirn" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote: >>>>> Rita? Are you a good photographer? >>>> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > than having to be paranoid about malware and installing updates every > time there's a day with an even number in it like Windows users do. From the above post: > "Ed Mullikin" <edmull2@cox.net> wrote: >> Everytime I plug a compact flash card (or memory stick) into my computer I [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> Downloader rushing to download my photos. How can I stop all of this >> "help"? Now - which computer is controlled by idiots? Wait! It is the other way around, isn't it? >> >>> Rita? Are you a good photographer? >> >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >No way. We Mac users just like to get work done on our computers How do you manage that ... there's virtually no software available for Macs? ;-) >>>>>> Rita? Are you a good photographer? >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > How do you manage that ... there's virtually no software available > for Macs? ;-) You seem to be lost in the WinBlows anti-Apple 90's propaganda FUD myth. You obviously have not heard of CS3, PS Elements, Lightroom, Aperture, GraphicConverter, Gimp, PhotoGPSEditor, Capture NX, the various Nik packages & the useful, but limited iPhoto. Linux can be run on all Macs with all that offers. ... and with the current Apple offerings there are several methods of compromising and running some variation of Window (XP, 2000, or the dreaded Vista), or all at the same time if needed. try that with your Dell. >> How do you manage that ... there's virtually no software available >> for Macs? ;-) >You seem to be lost in the WinBlows anti-Apple 90's propaganda FUD myth. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Linux can be run on all Macs with all that offers. Linux = not ready for prime time. >... and with the current Apple offerings there are several methods of >compromising and running some variation of Window (XP, 2000, or the >dreaded Vista), or all at the same time if needed. try that with your >Dell. ...must be time we all went over to Macs. > >> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > Linux = not ready for prime time. > Partially Right and Partially Wrong It is ready for prime time for the computer literate. It is also ready for prime time for anybody who has a computer literate friend who can set it up for the average person. It requires very little maintenance after that and is easy to use and causes less problems for the average users. > >> ... and with the current Apple offerings there are several methods of [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > ...must be time we all went over to Macs. > Partially Right and Partially Wrong > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > maintenance after that and is easy to use and causes less problems > for the average users. Been like that for 15-years and will always be like that. This is why Linux will never be able to compete and has always taken a back seat to Windows. Rita SignatureStamping out Internet stupidity one idiot at a time. Never empower the idiot, embrace it and stimulate it. For more details go to the Usenet Stimulus Project page. http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com >> Partially Right and Partially Wrong >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> maintenance after that and is easy to use and causes less problems >> for the average users. measekite, Nonsense. And you're in my killfile doncha know measekite for posting in HTML. >Been like that for 15-years and will always be like that. This is why Linux >will never be able to compete and has always taken a back seat to Windows. Rita Berkowitz, It often seems that way, although I believe there will be a prime time Linux at some time. > It often seems that way, although I believe there will be a prime > time Linux at some time. I have serious doubts about that. Developers are not interested in creating version of Linux which is easy to use, just to name one reason. SignatureAlfred Molon ------------------------------ Olympus 50X0, 8080, E3X0, E4X0, E5X0 and E3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site > >> It often seems that way, although I believe there will be a prime [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > creating version of Linux which is easy to use, just to name one reason. > Linux is currently easy to use. The hard part is getting appropriate drivers for all of the hardware. >> It often seems that way, although I believe there will be a prime >> time Linux at some time. > >I have serious doubts about that. Developers are not interested in >creating version of Linux which is easy to use, just to name one reason. Does your view not preclude the likelyhood of commercial corps finalising a prime-time version to make $$$? > >> It often seems that way, although I believe there will be a prime > >> time Linux at some time. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Does your view not preclude the likelyhood of commercial corps > finalising a prime-time version to make $$$? I'd be very surprised if that happens. SignatureAlfred Molon ------------------------------ Olympus 50X0, 8080, E3X0, E4X0, E5X0 and E3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site >> It often seems that way, although I believe there will be a prime >> time Linux at some time. > I have serious doubts about that. Developers are not interested in > creating version of Linux which is easy to use, just to name one reason. The version of Linux I use was specifically created to make it difficult for the user to tell whether they were using Linux or MS Windows, so that secretaries etc. could easily switch systems, since they tend to be trained in MS Windows, whereas the computer scientists they support mostly use Linux. Seems to work well. I also note that some of the local system vendors and are now converting their customers to Ubuntu Linux because they say it's easier to install and support. SignatureChris Malcolm cam@infirmatics.ed.ac.uk DoD #205 IPAB, Informatics, JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK [http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/] > The version of Linux I use was specifically created to make it > difficult for the user to tell whether they were using Linux or MS [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > customers to Ubuntu Linux because they say it's easier to install and > support. I tried Ubuntu (Ultimate) and didn't like the user interface. Huge icons taking a lot of space on the 1024x768 screen of my notebook for starters. Then I could not figure out how to get things done, i.e. launching applications, working with them etc. In the end I started wondering why I should punish myself with such an operating system, which also didn't run most applications I needed (would have had to switch to the Linux counterparts which were inferior in my opinion). Every couple of years I give a try at Linux and end up giving up. I've discussed Linux in the past years in newsgroups and received angry replies from Linux users. Been called 'wintroll' and been told 'we don't want you'. SignatureAlfred Molon ------------------------------ Olympus 50X0, 8080, E3X0, E4X0, E5X0 and E3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site >>>> Rita? Are you a good photographer? >>> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Hell no! A Mac is for idiots! Oh Rita! As an undeniable Nikon/Mac/PowerBook user I feel slighted. Could it be the Intel Apple product you are using is a fine 8-Core 3.2 GHz Mac Pro tower, not the lesser one size fits all iMac ?? Regards, Savageduck > Rita > Could it be the Intel Apple product you are using is a fine 8-Core 3.2 > GHz Mac Pro tower, not the lesser one size fits all iMac ?? That's just it; Apple finally got their act together and started using Intel. We PC folks have been using dual, quad, and 8-way Xeons years before Apple got a clue. Don't get me wrong, there's nothing wrong with Mac if all you want is a pretty desk top ornament. Gotta admit, that's one sweet looking case. Rita SignatureStamping out Internet stupidity one idiot at a time. Never empower the idiot, embrace it and stimulate it. For more details go to the Usenet Stimulus Project page. http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com >> Could it be the Intel Apple product you are using is a fine 8-Core 3.2 >> GHz Mac Pro tower, not the lesser one size fits all iMac ?? > >That's just it; Apple finally got their act together and started using >Intel. Because IBM couldn't or wouldn't keep it's chips up to the needed speed. > We PC folks have been using dual, quad, and 8-way Xeons years before >Apple got a clue. You're full of sh.t, as usual. Intel hasn't been making "8-way Xeons" or even quad Xeons for more than a year. Apple has been putting multiple processors into its computers for years. > Don't get me wrong, I don't. You're a dishonest cretin. SignatureRay Fischer rfischer@sonic.net >> We PC folks have been using dual, quad, and 8-way Xeons years before >> Apple got a clue. > > You're full of sh.t, as usual. Intel hasn't been making "8-way Xeons" > or even quad Xeons for more than a year. Apple has been putting > multiple processors into its computers for years. Intel Pentium 90 and 100 chips have been configured in SMP. How many Macs was it again during that time frame that ran SMP? Rita SignatureStamping out Internet stupidity one idiot at a time. Never empower the idiot, embrace it and stimulate it. For more details go to the Usenet Stimulus Project page. http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com >>> We PC folks have been using dual, quad, and 8-way Xeons years before >>> Apple got a clue. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Intel Pentium 90 and 100 chips have been configured in SMP. So have PPC processors. BFD. > How many Macs >was it again during that time frame that ran SMP? Nothing like moving the goalposts to rationalize your lies. SignatureRay Fischer rfischer@sonic.net On 4/27/08 4:47 PM, in article od2dnYjw99E2aYnVnZ2dnUVZ_tHinZ2d@supernews.com, "Rita Berkowitz" <ritaberk2008@aol.com> wrote: >> Could it be the Intel Apple product you are using is a fine 8-Core 3.2 >> GHz Mac Pro tower, not the lesser one size fits all iMac ?? [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Rita You are about as confused in your computer knowledge as your f.cked up photographic ability. Congrats for proving what you are, the Village Idiot of rec.photo.digital. >> Could it be the Intel Apple product you are using is a fine 8-Core 3.2 >> GHz Mac Pro tower, not the lesser one size fits all iMac ?? [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > you want is a pretty desk top ornament. Gotta admit, that's one sweet > looking case. Hey, I have been a PC Windows user for many years and poo pood Mac. Now I use a PC platform running Linux. Linux is more secure, more stable, and faster than Windows albiet you have to chase down hardware drivers and be more selective of software but it is free. It is free of $$$ and free of copy protection and all of the bullshit. That said, if I was a fan of Notebooks and the additional money did not matter much I would look at a Mac Powerbook today. I think that Mac OSX is more stable and a better OS than Windows. The main thing is cost. But under Mac you can use Gimp, Open Office, Thunderbird, and Firefox all without charge. > Rita On 4/27/08 6:57 AM, in article R8-dnUONF4A194nVnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@supernews.com, "Rita Berkowitz" <ritaberk2008@aol.com> wrote: >>>> Rita? Are you a good photographer? >>> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Hell no! A Mac is for idiots! Spoken out of you a.s... You need some Bean-O, bitch. >> Hell no! A Mac is for idiots! >> > Spoken out of you a.s... > > You need some Bean-O, bitch. LOL! Thong filtered so you can bask in the ambiance. Rita SignatureStamping out Internet stupidity one idiot at a time. Never empower the idiot, embrace it and stimulate it. For more details go to the Usenet Stimulus Project page. http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com On 4/27/08 4:47 PM, in article od2dnYvw99E2aYnVnZ2dnUVZ_tHinZ2d@supernews.com, "Rita Berkowitz" <ritaberk2008@aol.com> wrote: >>> Hell no! A Mac is for idiots! >>> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > LOL! Thong filtered so you can bask in the ambiance. The only thing 'filtered' is the O2 supply to your cerebral cortex. > Hell no! A Mac is for idiots! It certainly looks that way... Message-ID: <R8-dnUONF4A194nVnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@supernews.com> From: "Rita Berkowitz" <ritaberk2008@aol.com> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 06:59:36 -0500 User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b2 (Intel Mac OS X) X-Newsreader: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b2 (Intel Mac OS X) ...out of the mouths of lying idiots. SignatureChris Savage Kiss me. Or would you rather live in a Gateshead, UK land where the soap won't lather? - Billy Bragg >>>> Rita? Are you a good photographer? >>> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Hell no! A Mac is for idiots! What are you, 12? On 4/28/08 11:28 AM, in article JLydne7WTuS4ZojVnZ2dnUVZ_jKdnZ2d@giganews.com, "giga" <foldack@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Rita? Are you a good photographer? >>>> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > What are you, 12? Mentally? Guess again. This time, stay away from double digits. > A Nikon D3 with Nikkors so they can get razor sharp imaged and super tight > DoF they can cut themselves on. Hell, most Canon shooters are happy to [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > <http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com/sharp_dressed.htm> Yeah, I really wish my Digital Rebel had oversharpening and produced maximum 1024x768 pictures... That's some nice bokeh. Run along ;-) >A Nikon D3 with Nikkors so they can get razor sharp imaged and super tight > DoF they can cut themselves on. Hell, most Canon shooters are happy to [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Rita > A Nikon D3 with Nikkors so they can get razor sharp imaged and super tight > DoF they can cut themselves on. Hell, most Canon shooters are happy to [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Rita Short of having someone shoot you with whatever is at hand, I just wish you would go away and take your stupid nonsense with you. Dave Cohen >> A Nikon D3 with Nikkors so they can get razor sharp imaged and super >> tight [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > wish you would go away and take your stupid nonsense with you. > Dave Cohen Why do you say she posts stupid nonsense? Is that the same as super opinionated that is contrary to others? >>> A Nikon D3 with Nikkors so they can get razor sharp imaged and super >>> tight [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] >Why do you say she posts stupid nonsense? Is that the same as super >opinionated that is contrary to others? I don't know about Dave's newsreader, but mine shows me the name of the poster of unopened posts. If Dave continues to open Rita's posts, and continues to follow the links to Rita's photographs, and continues to be disturbed by them, then who's the idiot? SignatureTony Cooper - Orlando, Florida >> Why do you say she posts stupid nonsense? Is that the same as super >> opinionated that is contrary to others? [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > and continues to follow the links to Rita's photographs, and continues > to be disturbed by them, then who's the idiot? I think he's just upset that I haven't added and major updates to the Usenet Stimulus Project page. I need to get that updated as I have host of tips and tricks for the group. Rita SignatureStamping out Internet stupidity one idiot at a time. Never empower the idiot, embrace it and stimulate it. For more details go to the Usenet Stimulus Project page. http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com >>> Why do you say she posts stupid nonsense? Is that the same as super >>> opinionated that is contrary to others? [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Rita My beef is with the Nikon vs Canon nonsense. I in no way intend to criticize your photographic skills which certainly exceed mine and suspect you would do equally well with other comparable models. Now maybe you're just kidding and I was a bit grumpy when I posted so just forget the whole thing. One serious comment on your site, the dark blue links on the black background are hard to read. Your pics are very good. Dave Cohen >>> I don't know about Dave's newsreader, but mine shows me the name of >>> the poster of unopened posts. If Dave continues to open Rita's [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > maybe you're just kidding and I was a bit grumpy when I posted so just > forget the whole thing. Of course I'm just kidding. Nobody really cares what a photographer shoots with. I like both Nikon and Canon, just gotta use Nikkors on the Canon if you want to get the most out of it. > One serious comment on your site, the dark blue links on the black > background are hard to read. Your pics are very good. I'll look into it. Since I got pretty much unlimited bandwidth now I'll be bringing my fans all the best under one roof. I'm thinking about posting both audio and video seminars, interactive blog, as well as a sweet FAQ page that everyone with get a chuckle from. The old D3 is really getting a serious workout and I haven't had much time for my fans. Rita SignatureStamping out Internet stupidity one idiot at a time. Never empower the idiot, embrace it and stimulate it. For more details go to the Usenet Stimulus Project page. http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com >>>> I don't know about Dave's newsreader, but mine shows me the name of >>>> the poster of unopened posts. If Dave continues to open Rita's [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > Rita All is made up - keep up the good work. Wish we could say for the Democrats over here. Dave Cohen |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.