Anyone have experience with this lens? I just picked it up for around
600 USD. This complements the Sigma 24-70 2.8 I just got. I'm
thinking about the 10-22 or some 3rd party flavor thereof down the
road. Either way, any pointers owners have would be appreciated.
Thanks!
Adam.
Douglas - 28 Nov 2007 03:22 GMT
> Anyone have experience with this lens? I just picked it up for around
> 600 USD. This complements the Sigma 24-70 2.8 I just got. I'm
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Adam.
I have both of those lenses. The 24-70 is the worst. It's not the same late
model as the 70 -200 which is a pearler. Smooth, fast auto focus and pin
sharp results. I hardly ever use the 24 -70. It's noisey. Hunts for a focus
point the minute light falls off and doesn't focus very well at all past
about 20 feet. Not a pinch on the genuine Canon 24 -70 lens.
Douglas
ajamess@gmail.com - 28 Nov 2007 03:28 GMT
> <ajam...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Douglas
Ha - good to know my of my impending experience, then. As for the
24-70, I imagine once I get off a budget, I may be able to afford a
nicer normal zoom. That said, the Sigma 24-70 does seem reasonably
sharp, if a little soft at the wide end.
Thanks for the post :).
Adam.
bob - 28 Nov 2007 18:36 GMT
> Anyone have experience with this lens? I just picked it up for around
> 600 USD. This complements the Sigma 24-70 2.8 I just got. I'm
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Adam.
I have the 2001 version, 70-200 EX APO 2.8
It's an extremely sharp lens, fairly fast focus. I've hauled it around the
world a few times, and am very happy with the results.
Bob
Steve Dell - 29 Nov 2007 19:54 GMT
for a wide angle zoom, I have the Tokina 12-24 f/4 that is great.
in the mid-range, you might be more interested in the Tamron 24-75 f/2.8
Steve
> Anyone have experience with this lens? I just picked it up for around
> 600 USD. This complements the Sigma 24-70 2.8 I just got. I'm
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Adam.