Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / Digital Photo / October 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

why can't I use rechargeable batteries?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Nate Nagel - 27 Oct 2007 14:33 GMT
Hi all,

got a Nikon L6 that I've had for a year or two, although I had this same
problem with my previous two digicams.  I seem to only be able to get
good performance with non-rechargeable batteries (currently using
Energizer E2 lithium which actually seem to have decent life) if I use
my Energizer NiMH rechargeables I can *maybe* take one or two pics
before I get a "low battery" warning and the camera shuts down.  They
work fine in a flashlight however - will keep a mini mag lite going for
several hours.  I suspect it is because of the low voltage.  I tried to
get a set of the "real" Nikon batteries sold for my camera when I first
bought it but they were unavailable even direct from Nikon.  I suspect
the "problem" is the lower voltage of the NiMHs but don't know what to
do about it.

Is there something I'm missing here?  I'd *like* to be ecologically
correct but rechargeable batteries just don't seem to work in any
digital camera I've had.

I'm certainly not a serious photographer but I do need to use my camera
a lot for work.

nate

Signature

replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel

James Silverton - 27 Oct 2007 14:59 GMT
Nate  wrote  on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 09:33:45 -0400:

NN> got a Nikon L6 that I've had for a year or two, although I
NN> had this same problem with my previous two digicams.  I
NN> seem to only be able to get good performance with
NN> non-rechargeable batteries (currently using Energizer E2
NN> lithium which actually seem to have decent life) if I use
NN> my Energizer NiMH rechargeables I can *maybe* take one or
NN> two pics before I get a "low battery" warning and the
NN> camera shuts down.  They work fine in a flashlight however
NN> - will keep a mini mag lite going for several hours.  I
NN> suspect it is because of the low voltage.  I tried to get a
NN> set of the "real" Nikon batteries sold for my camera when I
NN> first bought it but they were unavailable even direct from
NN> Nikon.  I suspect the "problem" is the lower voltage of the
NN> NiMHs but don't know what to do about it.

NN> Is there something I'm missing here?  I'd *like* to be
NN> ecologically correct but rechargeable batteries just don't
NN> seem to work in any digital camera I've had.

Should your camera be adjusted for battery type? My small Nikon
certainly must be (on the setup screens) and the voltages that
the two types of battery deliver *are* significantly different.

James Silverton
Potomac, Maryland

E-mail, with obvious alterations:
not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not
Nate Nagel - 27 Oct 2007 15:08 GMT
> Nate  wrote  on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 09:33:45 -0400:
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> James Silverton
> Potomac, Maryland

Good point, I believe at least the L6 does have that setting although
that didn't seem to make a difference.

I just rechecked the Nikon web site and their own brand of batteries is
available again (I assume they private label them from someone else, but
still...) so I ordered four.  Charger is not available from Nikon so I
will have to try them in my existing Energizer branded charger.

nate

Signature

replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel

ASAAR - 28 Oct 2007 20:11 GMT
>> Should your camera be adjusted for battery type? My small Nikon
>> certainly must be (on the setup screens) and the voltages that the two
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> still...) so I ordered four.  Charger is not available from Nikon so I
> will have to try them in my existing Energizer branded charger.

 Of Nikon's several L# cameras, the L6 is the most battery
efficient, meaning that it should be good for the largest number of
shots per battery or per charge.  If you want to easily check
whether the camera is defective or not, buy a cheap set of fresh(!)
alkaline batteries and see how many shots you can take without using
the camera's flash.  For a fair test (which should more closely
duplicate Nikon's test methods) don't take them too quickly.  Take
maybe 10 or 15 at a time and then give the batteries a rest for 30
or 60 minutes.  Also, don't take them too slowly.  One shot every 5
or 10 minutes, with the LCD display burning up the batteries, might
be how some people take pictures, but it certainly won't be anything
like the conditions used by Nikon for rating battery usage.  Repeat
until the batteries are dead or until your finger tires.  According
to the L6 manual (page 120), alkalines should be good for 400 shots,
540 shots with Nikon's EN-MH1 NiMH batteries and up to 1,000 shots
using lithium AA batteries.  This performance is quite a bit better
than what Nikon claims for their L5, L10, L11 and L12 cameras.

  Surprisingly, Nikon didn't rate their cameras using the standard
CIPA test, which requires that 1/2 of the shots use the flash at
full power, among other things.  If they did, the numbers would
likely be considerably lower, but still much better than what you're
getting.  I assume that you've checked the battery contacts in the
camera, to make sure that they're not dirty or that there's no signs
of battery leakage.  It's best to do the test using fresh alkalines,
because that will eliminate the possibility that your rechargeable
batteries or the charger itself are causing the poor performance,
and one set of alkalines is about the cheapest way to test the
camera unless you have other, known good batteries/chargers.  That
the batteries can power a MagLite doesn't tell you very much, even
with an accurate Fluke meter.   How many hours the batteries can
power the MagLite will tell you more about the condition of the
rechargeable batteries.  MagLite's website has that information for
alkaline cells, but it may take some digging to locate it.  If you
can't get at least several hundre
Steve Wolstenholme - 27 Oct 2007 15:26 GMT
>Is there something I'm missing here?  I'd *like* to be ecologically
>correct but rechargeable batteries just don't seem to work in any
>digital camera I've had.

I had the same problem with a Nikon. They are very sensitive to a
slight drop in voltage. After exchanging possible problems & solutions
in this news group I gave up on rechargeable batteries. I now use
cheap alkaline batteries. They last for about 40 shots. Lithium
batteries last for about 50 shots but they are three times the price.

Steve

Signature

Neural Planner Software Ltd
http://www.easynn.com
http://www.tropheus.demon.co.uk

Jürgen Exner - 27 Oct 2007 16:04 GMT
NN> got a Nikon L6 that I've had for a year or two, although I
NN> had this same problem with my previous two digicams.  I

> I now use
> cheap alkaline batteries. They last for about 40 shots. Lithium
> batteries last for about 50 shots but they are three times the price.

40-50 shots? You must be kidding!

Not to re-kindle the dSLR versus P&S flame war, but the Li-ion batterie in
my D80 lasts _serveral_hundred_ shots in real life scenarions, meaning
including zooming, focussing, and VR of the heavy lenses and a little bit of
flash.
I don't even bother to take the charger on short weekend trips any longer.

jue
Steve Wolstenholme - 27 Oct 2007 16:19 GMT
> NN> got a Nikon L6 that I've had for a year or two, although I
> NN> had this same problem with my previous two digicams.  I
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>40-50 shots? You must be kidding!

No, it's about par for the course with the Coolpix 2100. No doubt more
modern cameras are considerably better.

Signature

Neural Planner Software Ltd
http://www.easynn.com
http://www.tropheus.demon.co.uk

ray - 27 Oct 2007 17:04 GMT
> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> nate

Same problem on my wife's Coolpix 2100.
Tzortzakakis Dimitrios - 27 Oct 2007 21:25 GMT
> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> work fine in a flashlight however - will keep a mini mag lite going for
> several hours.
That's very strange.Are you sure the NimH have received a full charge?I have
a mini mag lite (20 euros here) for more than 6 months in my tool case, with
the same set of sanyo 2000 mAh NimH and still it's going.While my still
camera runs on proprietary Li ion batteries (3.7 V 820 mAh)and with one
charge I had it going for more than 6 months.I also run a little transistor
radio for more than 4 months, with the same set of (chinese-MInWAor
something)Nimhs.(My camera is a P&S,nytech, www.nytech.de I'm not interested
in flame wars-it's very good for me)(For those of you not speaking german,
the nytech has an aluminium body, a pentax lens and a sony sensor.It's 7
megapixel.I know, it has small pixel size, but I always shoot at ISO 50
w/flash (or without).Long gone are the days when I shoot Tmax 3200 with my
Nikon FM-2 and the Nikkor 50/1.4...Now I'm older and I want convenience and
speed.Of course a dSLR is better, but how to define better?A mercedes is
better than a FIAT, but not everybody can afford a mercedes, and not
everybody *will* buy one, especially if all he wants is one car to go to
work with all his tools (like me);I'd buy a FIAT Punto Van.I like my
P&S;it's fast and takes excellent pictures, the difference is clear even on
5X4", compared to my previous one....On 8X10" it's very good, still, lots of
detail and no artifacts.
see here...
www.esnips.com/web/dimtzortzsPhotos

> I suspect it is because of the low voltage.  I tried to What is "Low
voltage"?You mean lower voltage than an alkaline?A brand new aerocell
alkaline shows 1.40 volts on my multimeter, an (almost full)MINWA chinese
1500 mAh NimH is just 1,10, while the 3,7 volt li ion for my camera is
3,60.ALL devices that take AA cells can work with NimH;the voltage
fluctuation does not matter for maglites and transistor radios, while the
cameras are *supposed* to be operating on Nimh anyway, nobody expects you to
put a new set of alkalines every week...That was true when only nicd were
available, and P&S were still film, but now nobody is supposed to use
alkalines, right?(Even the mains voltage is fluctuating 5%, now 5 past
eleven (evening)it's precisely 225 volts (nominal 230) on the computer
receptacle.The transmission voltage<the high voltage large poles you see in
country>can fluctuate 10%, but your utility uses transformers with automatic
voltage regulation,AVR, with a tap changer.Primary eg (in EU) say 150 kV,
secondary 15 kV.So, that's a 1:10 transformer.)

unavailable even direct from Nikon.  I suspect
> the "problem" is the lower voltage of the NiMHs but don't know what to
> do about it.

No idea, too.I don't know how they engineer cameras, but they surely do take
in account that you might use rechargeable batteries, don't they? Nimhs are
around since digital cameras have become popular, and they probably evolved
together.
> Is there something I'm missing here?  I'd *like* to be ecologically
> correct but rechargeable batteries just don't seem to work in any
> digital camera I've had.

I know, me too:-)In *any*?Even my crappy Kodak CX 7300 run for a couple of
dozens shots on Sanyo nicds (NB.:my current camera is made in China, but is
of excellent overall quality, and very well built, too.A small jewel.OTOH.
the Kodak was made in China too, but it's quality was someting like those
Nikons that the tab that hold the battery chamber broke off, remember?A
piece of junk.Shame on you, Nikon and Kodak!I was very pleased in the 20th
century with all Kodak films and chemicals, excellent quality all of
them.Also my Nikon FM-2 and its Nikkor glass were of utmost quality.But of
course, the chinese factories if they have good blueprints and good
materials provided, they will make excellent products, if they have crappy
blueprints and crappy plastics to boot they will produce junk
cameras.Notice, that 95% of my computer parts are made in China, including
the 17" miro CRT.Everything is working fine after 3 1/2 years, and 4-5 hours
operating every day, knock on wood.I read in wikipedia about capacitor
plague, and I thoroughly checked every mobo (QDI;chinese) but none seems to
fail.OTOH, these turkish made washing machines, that all immigrants buy,
have their motor running capacitors fail after a couple of years.On a
washing machine, it's 4 euros and a couple of minutes for an easy remedy.On
a mobo, it cam mean trashing the whole computer.Note, those turkish made
washing machines are of excellent quality and cost like 220 euros.Unlike
turkish made CRT TVs.

--
Tzortzakakis Dimitrios
major in electrical engineering
mechanized infantry reservist
hordad AT otenet DOT gr
Nate Nagel - 28 Oct 2007 02:01 GMT
>>Hi all,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 87 lines]
> mechanized infantry reservist
> hordad AT otenet DOT gr

I guess I wasn't clear about the problem.  I can take the batteries out
of the camera after the camera says the batteries are dead and they
still have a nearly full charge according to my Fluke and my Mag-Lite.

nate

Signature

replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel

tnom@mucks.net - 28 Oct 2007 04:15 GMT
>I guess I wasn't clear about the problem.  I can take the batteries out
>of the camera after the camera says the batteries are dead and they
>still have a nearly full charge according to my Fluke and my Mag-Lite.
>
>nate
Specifically what is nearly fully charged ?
Tzortzakakis Dimitrios - 28 Oct 2007 18:55 GMT
> >>Hi all,
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 83 lines]
> >
> > --
gr

> I guess I wasn't clear about the problem.  I can take the batteries out
> of the camera after the camera says the batteries are dead and they
> still have a nearly full charge according to my Fluke and my Mag-Lite.

Of course they can still operate your maglite and they show a voltage higher
than 1 volt in your Fluke, since digital cameras do no drain batteries
completely, due to security reasons(there would be a point where you would
lose images because of insufficient power).The problem could lie that your
Nimhs have reached the end of their life, so they can't supply enough
current anymore;that's only my speculation, though.Their life cycle is up to
1000 charging/discharging cycles.

HTH,

--
Tzortzakakis Dimitrios
major in electrical engineering
mechanized infantry reservist
hordad AT otenet DOT gr
Larry Bud - 29 Oct 2007 02:00 GMT
> >>Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 91 lines]
> of the camera after the camera says the batteries are dead and they
> still have a nearly full charge according to my Fluke and my Mag-Lite.

Does your fluke meter put a load on them?  A battery will read near
full voltage with no load, but dead with a load.
Tzortzakakis Dimitrios - 29 Oct 2007 14:58 GMT
> > >>Hi all,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 94 lines]
> Does your fluke meter put a load on them?  A battery will read near
> full voltage with no load, but dead with a load.

The load of a modern digital multimeter is negligible, because it drains its
own 9Vcell to display.Even an analogue multimeter, like the one I used,has a
very high internal resistance, in the range of Mohms(megaohms);it takes
power from the circuit to move the needle, though.

--
Tzortzakakis Dimitrios
major in electrical engineering
mechanized infantry reservist
hordad AT otenet DOT gr
Larry Bud - 29 Oct 2007 17:40 GMT
On Oct 29, 9:58 am, "Tzortzakakis Dimitrios" <nowh...@noone.com>
wrote:

> > > >>Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 141 lines]
> very high internal resistance, in the range of Mohms(megaohms);it takes
> power from the circuit to move the needle, though.

Exactly my point.  Unless the fluke meter has a setting designed to
test batteries by putting a load on them, the voltage reading is
meaningless.
tnom@mucks.net - 28 Oct 2007 02:47 GMT
Your problem may be from something other than you think.

The problem may be caused by dirty contacts either on the
batteries or the camera, or both.

It could also be caused by not using the NIMH batteries in a timely
manner because standard NIMH batteries self discharge and may be
under voltage after sitting just a month or two.

Try cleaning the contacts and purchase a set of Eneloop low self
discharge batteries.
Ron Hunter - 28 Oct 2007 06:43 GMT
> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> nate

My first suggestion would be to take your camera to a Nikon service
center and have it checked out.  It looks like the setting for the low
battery indicator is at too high a voltage.
Steve B - 28 Oct 2007 08:56 GMT
>> Hi all,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> and have it checked out.  It looks like the setting for the low battery
> indicator is at too high a voltage.

I agree.  Also, some NiMh are a slightly lower voltage than others and it
can be enough to make a big difference in service life if the cut-off
voltage is set too high.  The low self-discharge Eneloops or Hybrios have a
slightly higher voltage than just about all ordinary NiMh after a little
usage, and may give good service.
TrevM - 29 Oct 2007 00:18 GMT
> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> nate

Hi Nate,
Since your camera uses only 2 AA cells, the first thing to note is that they
have to provide double the current compared with a 4-cell camera (other
things being equal).  Also, the total voltage of less than 3 V (fully
charged) soon drops below 2.4 V when you start using them - a very low
starting point for any kind of electronics.  Two alkaline cells on the other
hand will maintain a voltage nearer 3 for much longer as they discharge,
although they will struggle to provide the high current demanded in many
2-cell setups.  So, have you checked the maximum current available from your
batteries, as well as the voltage?  I do this brutally by shorting the cell
for a second or so (only!) between the terminals of a multimeter with a 10
or 20 amp range as an ammeter.  A good rechargeable will give 5 to 10 amps
or even more (depending on the resistance of the ammeter and the internal
resistance of the cell, which is what is actually under test here), and so
will a fresh alkaline cell.  This treatment should not be prolonged or
repeated often, as the cell will soon overheat and be ruined anyway!  But it
is a crude way of ensuring that both of your cells are OK and reasonably
matched for current capability, as well as giving the right voltage.  You
will be surprised how often two cells from the same packet are very
different in their available current outputs, and you may have to test quite
a few to get two really good ones.

Certainly with 4 rechargeable cells in my equipment, I have found that there
is almost always one noticeably weaker than the others in a set as bought,
and as with only two cells it is the weak one that determines the number of
shots you get.  So battery life between charges in practice is rarely
anywhere near manufacturers' claims of hundreds of shots, in my experience,
whether cameras or flash guns are involved.  I have usually had to test at
least 8 cells to get 4 equally good strong ones.  Such variability between
cells is probably much less with non-rechargeables if from the same package,
so that is another reason why you might get better life from them than you
might expect.

If anyone can advise on a make of rechargeables whose quality control is
good enough to ensure that 4 out of 4 cells in a packet are equally good for
curreent capability and capacity (say, within 10%), I would like to hear
from them!

TrevM
TrevM - 30 Oct 2007 00:02 GMT
Second thoughts below...

>> Hi all,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>> Energizer NiMH rechargeables I can *maybe* take one or two pics before I
>> get a "low battery" warning and the camera shuts down.  [...]

>> nate
>
> Hi Nate,

[...snip]

> So, have you checked the maximum current available from your batteries, as
> well as the voltage?  I do this brutally by shorting the cell for a second
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> will a fresh alkaline cell.  This treatment should not be prolonged or
> repeated often, as the cell will soon overheat and be ruined anyway!

[...snip]

And I also want to add that there is a risk of wrecking the multimeter - a
good AA cell can give 12 -15 amps into a near-short-circuit, and this
current could damage a meter with a 10 amp max. rating.  So be careful, and
on second thoughts I would say you definitely need a meter capable of
handling at least 20 amps.

TrevM
SMS 斯蒂文• 夏 - 30 Oct 2007 01:58 GMT
> And I also want to add that there is a risk of wrecking the multimeter - a
> good AA cell can give 12 -15 amps into a near-short-circuit, and this
> current could damage a meter with a 10 amp max. rating.  So be careful, and
> on second thoughts I would say you definitely need a meter capable of
> handling at least 20 amps.

For "enrichment day" at my 4th grader's school last year I did a
presentation on Ohm's Law. I build up twelve experimenter boards with
ten resistors each, and two AA batteries. All worked well on measuring
the resistance and voltage, and even the current when measured properly
since it was only maybe 20mA around the loop. The problem came when the
students played around with the meters ($3 digital multimeters from
Harbor Freight) and put them directly across the batteries while in
current mode. By the end of the day, ten out of twelve meters had blown
fuses. No permanent damage, but a pain to find inexpensive small 1/2A
fuses and do the replacement.

I think more expensive meters have circuit breakers or resettable
polyfuses, but the cheap meters have regular fuses.
Tzortzakakis Dimitrios - 30 Oct 2007 18:43 GMT
> Second thoughts below...
>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> on second thoughts I would say you definitely need a meter capable of
> handling at least 20 amps.

No, he needs a current transformer;-)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Current_transformer

--
Tzortzakakis Dimitrios
major in electrical engineering
mechanized infantry reservist
hordad AT otenet DOT gr
TrevM - 30 Oct 2007 21:57 GMT
>> Second thoughts below...

[...]

>> > So, have you checked the maximum current available from your batteries,
> as
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> mechanized infantry reservist
> hordad AT otenet DOT gr

Ho Ho!

Seriously though, you have inspired me to edit the opening paragraph of that
Wiki entry to mention the fact that current transformers are a.c. devices!

TrevM
Larry Bud - 29 Oct 2007 02:03 GMT
> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> I'm certainly not a serious photographer but I do need to use my camera
> a lot for work.

What the rating on the batteries?
Jim - 31 Oct 2007 04:30 GMT
> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> nate

Simple   NICADS turn out 1.2 volts... Alkaline  1.5 volts  Big
difference. If the camera isn't designed to use the lower voltage then,
it won't work.. NiCads work best in high current device, short demand
devices... ie.e Electronic Flash,  some power tools like power screw
drivers.   They don't work so well in low amperage, long draw devices
like flashlights and cameras.

Signature

Jim     <jen....not....home..remvdots...@....yahoo

tnom@mucks.net - 31 Oct 2007 09:30 GMT
>Simple   NICADS turn out 1.2 volts... Alkaline  1.5 volts  Big
>difference. If the camera isn't designed to use the lower voltage then,
>it won't work.. NiCads work best in high current device, short demand
>devices... ie.e Electronic Flash,  some power tools like power screw
>drivers.   They don't work so well in low amperage, long draw devices
>like flashlights and cameras.

Who mentioned NICADS?..........

The battery in question is  a NIMH battery.

Since when is a camera not a high amperage device?

Since when is a camera not designed to use NIMH batteries?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.