Ligtroom revised

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Wayne J. Cosshall - 28 Jun 2007 06:26 GMT

Hi All,

Adobe has put out a 1.1 release of Lightroom:
http://www.dimagemaker.com/article.php?articleID=1036

Cheers,

Wayne

Signature

Wayne J. Cosshall
Publisher, The Digital ImageMaker, http://www.dimagemaker.com/
Blog http://www.digitalimagemakerworld.com/
Publisher, Experimental Digital Photography
http://www.experimentaldigitalphotography.com
Personal art site http://www.cosshall.com/

Reply to this Message

Hal Lowe - 28 Jun 2007 13:54 GMT

>Hi All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Wayne

Hi Wayne,

Thanks for the head's up!

http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshoplightroom/

Regards,

Hal Lowe

http://www.cafepress.com/halogos (unique logo t-shirts, mugs & more)
http://www.halowe-graphics.com/photo.html (digiPhoto)
http://www.halowe-graphics.com/music.html (Music Central)
http://www.1and1.com/?k_id=7391019 (web hosting)
http://www.halowe-graphics.com/tinc?key=0TmhZVQ5&formname=web_email

Reply to this Message

Aaron - 28 Jun 2007 17:29 GMT

And lo, Wayne J. Cosshall <wayne@dimagemaker.com> emerged from the ether
and spake thus:

> Hi All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Wayne

I can't even explain how happy I am that they have implemented the
ability to import photos from other catalogs. The library spray can is
a hot new tool, too.

http://www.singleservingphoto.com/2007/06/27/finally-photoshop-lightroom-11/

Signature

Aaron
http://www.fisheyegallery.com
http://www.singleservingphoto.com

Reply to this Message

Saguenay - 28 Jun 2007 20:36 GMT

> Hi All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Wayne

What do you guys think about the supposed newly recoded noise reduction
(according to dpreview only)?
Seems to me that the Colour noise is unchanged: works well at 25, then, no
more usefull between 25 and 100, no difference, so what?
Luminance : **seems** to me that it works better on the whole range than in
LightRoom 1.0, but **seems** to me that it has acquired the same drawback
that existed in RawShooter: sort of a "watercolor"-isation. Pretty ygly. I
think I'll continue tu use Noiseware instead.

Curious to read and learn about your opinions!
m.b.

Reply to this Message

John McWilliams - 29 Jun 2007 14:03 GMT

> What do you guys think about the supposed newly recoded noise reduction
> (according to dpreview only)?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Curious to read and learn about your opinions!

Pages and pages have been written on this. It's important to remember
that what you see on the screen isn't exactly what you'll get in print.

Signature

john mcwilliams

Reply to this Message

Saguenay - 29 Jun 2007 23:33 GMT

>> What do you guys think about the supposed newly recoded noise reduction
>> (according to dpreview only)?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Pages and pages have been written on this. It's important to remember that
> what you see on the screen isn't exactly what you'll get in print.

Discussing about difference between what does v. 1.0 and v. 1.1 about noise
reduction.
I doubt that "pages and pages" have been written here about this 2 or 3 days
old v. 1.1

Not dicussing about printing.

mb

Reply to this Message

John McWilliams - 30 Jun 2007 00:19 GMT

>>> What do you guys think about the supposed newly recoded noise reduction
>>> (according to dpreview only)?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>> Pages and pages have been written on this. It's important to remember that
>> what you see on the screen isn't exactly what you'll get in print.

> Discussing about difference between what does v. 1.0 and v. 1.1 about noise
> reduction.
> I doubt that "pages and pages" have been written here about this 2 or 3 days
> old v. 1.1

Didn't mean right here, and I see I should have been clearer. It's still
being actively debated, but some folks jump to conclusions that what
appears to be a problem at one level of viewing will necessarily
translate into a problem with the final print.

Signature

john mcwilliams

Reply to this Message