> > Does anyone knows what is the largestcapacityCFcard that can be
> > used with30D?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> PS. The camera may display 999 exposures left (if it is limited to 3 digits)
> but just read 999 or more in that case.
Thank you for the fast response.
Given the high price of 16GB, I may go for multiple 8GB.
Could you recommend a specific brand/model?
Regards
John McWilliams - 18 May 2007 22:10 GMT
>>> Does anyone knows what is the largestcapacityCFcard that can be
>>> used with30D?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Given the high price of 16GB, I may go for multiple 8GB.
> Could you recommend a specific brand/model?
I've had no problems with Lexar or Sandisk; nor have I had any with a
couple of no-name brands.
You might consider multiple 4 Gigs; each one will still hold plenty of
RAW files, which I assume you plan on shooting mostly. Check out the
per-Gig cost; the "sweet spot" is a moving target, and it may fall into
a size that makes sense for you.

Signature
john mcwilliams
Haydon - 18 May 2007 22:29 GMT
Yeah, 4gb will hold well over 400 RAW's. Not to mention if you have
multiple cards, your images are safer.
> You might consider multiple 4 Gigs; each one will still hold plenty of RAW
> files, which I assume you plan on shooting mostly.
William4 - 19 May 2007 15:34 GMT
> Thank you for the fast response.
> Given the high price of 16GB, I may go for multiple 8GB.
> Could you recommend a specific brand/model?
>
> Regards
Not personally, it is a variable market place out there and there are too
many factors.
No,1 being where are you buying from (in the world).
I have tested quite a lot of flash drives (CF and USB drives) for speed etc
and found some remarkable facts - not all the speed increases affect *both*
reading and writing the same, most of the multiplier figures can be
justified (by the manufacture) but are not what you'd expect. The greater
the cost of the drive generally the better for capacity/speed, so just as
you'd expect you get what you pay for.
So for my purchases I get down to xxx for this size/speed or (maybe twice)
the capacity or slower for similar money.
Second hand ones are often a good buy - but are never the faster cards (just
due to their age), and often not large enough.
Not all ebee ones are bad - but there are a lot of fakes, workers but not so
quick.
Very much depends upon your own needs/wants - esp. the kit you are using it
in. (Newer camera can have larger buffers *and* write faster too).
Frank Pittel - 20 May 2007 04:25 GMT
: > > Does anyone knows what is the largestcapacityCFcard that can be
: > > used with30D?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
: > PS. The camera may display 999 exposures left (if it is limited to 3 digits)
: > but just read 999 or more in that case.
: Thank you for the fast response.
: Given the high price of 16GB, I may go for multiple 8GB.
: Could you recommend a specific brand/model?
I've been using the ridata cards. The price is good and they're as fast and
reliable as the Sandisk Extreme III's.

Signature
-------------------
Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
Tomgo1 - 22 May 2007 03:22 GMT
I have used Transcend CF cards for years.
Great card. Good prices,
I have 2 1GB and 2 2GB and believe me that's plenty.
TG
> Whatever you put in it.
> CF isn't 'limited' like other technologies, the controller is there. PS.
> The camera may display 999 exposures left (if it is limited to 3 digits)
> but just read 999 or more in that case.
CF isn't, but it depends whether it's formatted FAT16 or FAT32. If the
camera can only cope with FAT16 that implies a 4GB limit, while the limit
for FAT32 is 2TB (2048GB). I suspect most modern cameras can cope with
FAT32, but it's worth checking.
Theo
Silicon Sam - 20 May 2007 19:49 GMT
> > Whatever you put in it.
> > CF isn't 'limited' like other technologies, the controller is there. PS.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Theo
FAT16 limit is 2GB, not 4.
Mitko - 21 May 2007 17:18 GMT
> On May 20, 11:18 am, Theo Markettos <theom
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> FAT16 limit is 2GB, not 4.
This is a limitation for the size of a single file supported by the
file system.
I don't see how is this relevant to the max size of the card that is
supported by the camera. Given the fact that the camera does not make
movies, it is not possible to reach this limit with a single image
file.
Regards,
Mitko