I'm not complaining about the pics, but the method of advertising it.
He was asking opinions, now he seems to have decided he wasn't happy
with that so he'll just go for folks having a look. Writing 'sexy
pics' is probably aiming for and hoping for hits at any cost.

Thanks Roy

As mentioned in an earlier reply to Paul , perhaps sexy varies from
person to person , for me it does not mean neccessarily nude etc but in
any event thanks for the comments on ths pics , much appreciated

I did send paul another link where there may be a bit more to
expectations, i will make sure to clearly indicate in the title what to
expect..

http://www.pbase.com/marcc/image/66685612

in case it's needed: warning - nudity in the link above

cheers

It's not like that Marco. Sorry if it sounds like I'm jumping down
your throat, it's not personal. If you look lately we seem to be
getting a small rash of links without real explanation. As for what
defines 'sexy' I find most 'glamour' shots boring, there just doesn't
seem to be anything new to say. So, your hi-contrast face shot has
more to say by miles (to me) than any head and shoulder pic of a
woman. I probably ogled girly mags like any other lad as I grew up but
it's just same old same old now. That's not having a go at your
technical abilities or anything, just saying it needs to have an extra
something to interest me now.

Thanks Marco... the adds are beyond my control, it's a free site so I
have zero choice in the matter. :O)