Photo Forum / Digital Photography / Digital Photo / August 2006
DSLR choices?? help please
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Stormlady - 23 Aug 2006 20:21 GMT So I'm in the market now for a DSLR and I jsut don't know what to do. We're definately getting either a Canon or a Nikon. We were looking at the D70s and the 20D primarily. Then Nikon goes and announces the D80 and Canon stops making the 20D so that kinda threw us for a loop and altered our choices somewhat. The 30 D I'm fairly sure is out of our price range, but should I really count out the 20D because it's been discontinued?
We're planning to go to the camera shop tonight and would like to have some idea what we're after. Is there any real difference between the CCD and CMOS sensors, I believe Canon uses one while Nikon uses the other. Is it worth waiting for the D80 over the D70s?
Right now we're just taking general pictures, some scenery, a lot of our daughter (of course). This would be our 3rd camera in 17 months so we would like to get one we're going to be happy with.
That will leave us with a Nikon cp5600 and a Kodak P850, which would be better to keep for situations were a DSLR is not really practical, or just sell both because we'll never use them again?
 Signature ******** http://www.flickr.com/photos/stormlady/
Bill - 23 Aug 2006 21:39 GMT >So I'm in the market now for a DSLR and I jsut don't know what to do. What is it about DSLR that makes you want one?
> We're >definately getting either a Canon or a Nikon. We were looking at the D70s >and the 20D primarily. Then Nikon goes and announces the D80 and Canon >stops making the 20D so that kinda threw us for a loop and altered our >choices somewhat. The 30 D I'm fairly sure is out of our price range, but >should I really count out the 20D because it's been discontinued? If you can find the 20D, there's nothing wrong with it. Get it and save some money.
Have you considered the Nikon D50? It's a great camera with plenty of features, and image quality is as good as the others. It costs a fair bit less than the others mentioned too. The price difference could be used to invest in better lenses.
>We're planning to go to the camera shop tonight and would like to have some >idea what we're after. Is there any real difference between the CCD and >CMOS sensors, I believe Canon uses one while Nikon uses the other. They work slightly different, but they do the same thing. More important are things like features and performance.
> Is it worth waiting for the D80 over the D70s? That depends on your needs, but generally I think for the price the D80 will be a fairly solid choice over the D70s.
But we have to see it on the store shelves first.
>Right now we're just taking general pictures, some scenery, a lot of our >daughter (of course). This would be our 3rd camera in 17 months so we would >like to get one we're going to be happy with. What do you do with the images?
Do you make large poster-sized prints?
Will you be buying 2-3 lenses, or just use one lense?
>That will leave us with a Nikon cp5600 and a Kodak P850, which would be >better to keep for situations were a DSLR is not really practical, or just >sell both because we'll never use them again? I'd keep one of them for social functions where you don't want to drag around the DSLR. I have a small 3mp P&S that I keep for BBQs, parties and so forth. If you're having a few drinks, you don't want anyone to drop a $1000+ camera/lense combo! ACK!
:-( Ben Thomas - 23 Aug 2006 21:40 GMT > So I'm in the market now for a DSLR and I jsut don't know what to do. We're > definately getting either a Canon or a Nikon. We were looking at the D70s [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > better to keep for situations were a DSLR is not really practical, or just > sell both because we'll never use them again? I'm very happy with my D70 - the D80 will have more resolution IINM which is great if you want to print bigger than A4 (~8.5"x11") or absolutely must have the highest possible resolution at A4 size. The are other reasons but for scenery or family photos I don't think you need the extra resolution.
I had a Kodak DX6490 (4MP 10x zoom) for 12 months before upgrading to the Nikon D70 for the reasons below.
The main advantages of a DSLR are: - shallow depth of field is achievable so portraits are much more attractive - shutter lag is non-existent. - the lenses are sensors are bigger so you get less noise and sharper pictures
May I ask why you are not satisfied with the Kodak P850?
Ben
Stormlady - 23 Aug 2006 22:29 GMT >> So I'm in the market now for a DSLR and I jsut don't know what to do. >> We're definately getting either a Canon or a Nikon. We were looking at [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > Ben The Kodak is not a bad little camera, it's just that there are things that we try to do with it that we just can't. Macro being a big one for me, it just doesn't get close enough to the subject sometimes. My boyfriend is unhappy with the results he gets when he tries to take clouds/sunsets, they just don't look as crisp as we would like. And of course the shutter delay.
John Turco - 29 Aug 2006 06:06 GMT > >> So I'm in the market now for a DSLR and I jsut don't know what to do. > >> We're definately getting either a Canon or a Nikon. We were looking at [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > unhappy with the results he gets when he tries to take clouds/sunsets, they > just don't look as crisp as we would like. And of course the shutter delay. Hello, Stormlady:
Are you and your friend both sure that you want (or need) the added expense and complexity? A bulky, heavy DSLR body is often the heart of a "camera system," and buying and lugging extra lenses, filters, flash attachments, etc., can easily turn photography into a chore, rather than a pleasure.
Also, a DSLR's interchangeable lenses ensure that its sensor will require cleaning, at least occasionally. (Unlike a "point & shoot" digicam, with its fixed lens.)
I'm not trying to dash your dreams, but merely pointing out that you should cautiously weigh all the factors involved. You're moving up to considerably costlier equipment, and must avoid rushing any purchases.
Even with a fancy DSLR on hand, you'll still need a backup camera, and the Kodak P850 is an ideal one. Use it at those times that you just don't feel like hassling with the DSLR, or when the "big gun" would be overkill. (I, myself, own a P850, and it's as close to a DSLR as I care to get. <g>)
Good luck and happy hunting!
Cordially, John Turco <jtur@concentric.net>
Stormlady - 29 Aug 2006 14:01 GMT >> >> So I'm in the market now for a DSLR and I jsut don't know what to do. >> >> We're definately getting either a Canon or a Nikon. We were looking [quoted text clipped - 61 lines] > attachments, etc., can easily turn photography into a chore, rather than > a pleasure. Hi, we're sure 100% that we want a DSLR. We're figuring that we'll get it by Christmas.
> Also, a DSLR's interchangeable lenses ensure that its sensor will > require cleaning, at least occasionally. (Unlike a "point & shoot" > digicam, with its fixed lens.) Yep, I know.
> I'm not trying to dash your dreams, but merely pointing out that you > should cautiously weigh all the factors involved. You're moving up to > considerably costlier equipment, and must avoid rushing any purchases. We've decided to wait a bit till we save a bit more money and the new offerings from Nikon and Canon are available.
> Even with a fancy DSLR on hand, you'll still need a backup camera, and > the Kodak P850 is an ideal one. Use it at those times that you just [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Good luck and happy hunting! Thanks Heather
John Turco - 31 Aug 2006 08:55 GMT > "John Turco" <jtur@concentric.net> wrote in message <edited, for brevity>
> > Hello, Stormlady: > > [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > Thanks > Heather Hello, Heather:
You're welcome, and please be sure to keep us apprised of your continuing efforts.
Cordially, John Turco <jtur@@concentric.net>
Adrian Boliston - 23 Aug 2006 22:32 GMT > The main advantages of a DSLR are: > - shallow depth of field is achievable so portraits are much more > attractive > - shutter lag is non-existent. > - the lenses are sensors are bigger so you get less noise and sharper > pictures The whole "experience" of using a DSLR is totally different frfom a P&S camera:
No more fiddling around with complex menus to get it to do what you want - controls are at your fingertips. (WB, ISO, metering mode etc) Being able to set aperture or shutter speed while looking through the viewfinder. Not having to hold the thing at arms's length looking at a grainy LCD "preview" No more fiddling with a useless "zoom button" - you actually get to control the zoom via a zoom ring. You get a proper "click" when you take the photo, rather than with a P&S when you are never really sure when it has actually taken the shot!
Cheers - Adrian www.boliston.co.uk
David J Taylor - 24 Aug 2006 07:41 GMT []
> The whole "experience" of using a DSLR is totally different frfom a > P&S camera: [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > shot! > Cheers - Adrian www.boliston.co.uk Adrian,
You should try one of the ZLR cameras - you can set the shutter speed etc. while looking through the EVF, and the camera doesn't need to be held away from the body. Having a loud "clunk" noise when you take a picture isn't always an advantage!
David
ASAAR - 24 Aug 2006 09:31 GMT >> You get a proper "click" when you take the photo, rather than with a >> P&S when you are never really sure when it has actually taken the [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > from the body. Having a loud "clunk" noise when you take a picture isn't > always an advantage! And with the ZLR you often are able to select different noises or disable them completely. Some digital P&S cameras, such as Ricoh's moderately expensive GR Digital can have short enough delays (Half to Full-press Lag using external viewfinder of ~0.03 sec.) and even No Press to Full-press Lag can be very short (0.2 sec) if the camera is used in Snap Mode which uses fixed focus, so there's no AF delay.
Adrian Boliston - 24 Aug 2006 09:33 GMT > Adrian, > > You should try one of the ZLR cameras - you can set the shutter speed etc. > while looking through the EVF, and the camera doesn't need to be held away > from the body. Having a loud "clunk" noise when you take a picture isn't > always an advantage! There was a zlr the salesman showed me when I was buying my D70s (a panasonic i think) but it didn't have the erganomic "feel" that the Nikon had, yet it was almost as expensive! Also it has not got the flexability of swapping lenses. Also an EVF can never match a true optical viewfinder
ASAAR - 24 Aug 2006 09:42 GMT > Also an EVF can never match a true optical viewfinder True. Some people actually prefer seeing less than 100% of what will be captured by the sensor as well as the preferring the parallax error that can make macro shooting so much fun! :)
David J Taylor - 24 Aug 2006 10:03 GMT []
> There was a zlr the salesman showed me when I was buying my D70s (a > panasonic i think) but it didn't have the erganomic "feel" that the > Nikon had, yet it was almost as expensive! Also it has not got the > flexability of swapping lenses. Also an EVF can never match a true > optical viewfinder You mean you can get the D70S for about GBP 250? - I hadn't realised they were that strongly discounted! <G>
Something like the compact Panasonic FZ5 (weighing about 300g) would probably be a nice complementary camera when you don't want to risk the D70S. No dust when not swapping lenses, as well!
David
VK - 24 Aug 2006 12:18 GMT To the OP -
You've been getting some good advice but you may find this article of mine, on picking your first SLR, to be useful: http://www.photosafariindia.com/articles/beg1-slr.html
It most likely wont help you figure out which camera you need, but it will help you ask the right questions to determine the best camera for YOU (as opposed to me, or anyone else).
Cheers, Vandit
PS: There is also a newly-revised companion piece of lenses that you may find helpful.
Mr.Bolshoyhuy - 25 Aug 2006 03:26 GMT > There was a zlr the salesman showed me when I was buying my D70s (a > panasonic i think) but it didn't have the erganomic "feel" that the Nikon > had, yet it was almost as expensive! Also it has not got the flexability > of swapping lenses. Also an EVF can never match a true optical viewfinder was it the Lumix FZ30? Yes, the sensor is smaller than on a DSLR, but for $500, you get a 35 - 420mm [12x] (+extended optical zoom), thus no need for additional lenses. How much does a prime 420mm lens cost for a Nikon or Canon?
Bill Funk - 25 Aug 2006 16:13 GMT >> There was a zlr the salesman showed me when I was buying my D70s (a >> panasonic i think) but it didn't have the erganomic "feel" that the Nikon [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >additional lenses. >How much does a prime 420mm lens cost for a Nikon or Canon? For a Canon 400mm f/5.6L, about $1100US. But that lens is far, far better than the one on an FZ30. Just asking about the price doesn't get you a fair comparison.
 Signature Bill Funk replace "g" with "a"
Mr.Bolshoyhuy - 27 Aug 2006 02:36 GMT > >was it the Lumix FZ30? > >Yes, the sensor is smaller than on a DSLR, but for $500, [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Bill Funk > replace "g" with "a" I see. So I am supposed to spend $1100 for the lens alone when I could get the Olympus Evolt-500 with the 150mm kit for less. Then attach a 2x Tele-converter to it, and get 300mm. For anyone not working for National Geographic, $1100 for 400mm would be mucho $.
Bill Funk - 27 Aug 2006 03:32 GMT >> >was it the Lumix FZ30? >> >Yes, the sensor is smaller than on a DSLR, but for $500, [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >For anyone not working for National Geographic, $1100 for 400mm would >be mucho $. I'm not telling you to buy anything. What I said was, "Just asking about the price doesn't get you a fair comparison." You can buy whatever suits your needs/wants and budget. Yes, $1100 is a lot of money, but I seriously doubt only NG photogs buy them.
 Signature Bill Funk replace "g" with "a"
Neil Harrington - 24 Aug 2006 12:42 GMT "David J Taylor" <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.not-this-bit.nor-this-part.uk> wrote
> You should try one of the ZLR cameras - you can set the shutter speed etc. > while looking through the EVF, and the camera doesn't need to be held away > from the body. Having a loud "clunk" noise when you take a picture isn't > always an advantage! As I recall, "ZLR" was the term coined by Olympus several years ago to mean its non-interchangeable zoom-lens 35mm SLRs. But you're using it to mean the more advanced "SLR-like" digital cameras, right?
If this is a new usage, I do like it a lot better than "P&S" for such cameras -- which is terribly inappropriate.
Neil
David J Taylor - 24 Aug 2006 12:56 GMT []
> As I recall, "ZLR" was the term coined by Olympus several years ago > to mean its non-interchangeable zoom-lens 35mm SLRs. But you're using [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Neil Yes, Neil. There was a discussion some time ago, when the split of rec.photo.digital was being considered, as to what to call 'more advanced "SLR-like" digital cameras', and ZLR won the day. Things have blurred even more since then, with many of the entry-level DSLRs offering P&S features like scene modes, EVF, built-in flash etc. etc.
David
Neil Harrington - 24 Aug 2006 22:11 GMT > [] >> As I recall, "ZLR" was the term coined by Olympus several years ago [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > rec.photo.digital was being considered, as to what to call 'more advanced > "SLR-like" digital cameras', and ZLR won the day. Ah. Fair enough. Technically wrong (the "R" part) but it's sure better than the other.
> Things have blurred even more since then, with many of the entry-level > DSLRs offering P&S features like scene modes, EVF, built-in flash etc. > etc. How can even an entry-level dSLR have an EVF? What camera, for instance? (Mostly I only follow Nikons and Minoltas [Sony] and don't know much about the others.)
As for built-in flash, I don't see that as a "P&S feature." Every 35mm SLR I bought after the Minolta 8000i has a built-in flash, as do my Maxxum 5D and Nikon D70s of course. These are certainly not P&S cameras.
As for scene modes, sure they're on P&S models, but Minolta SLR 35s have used them for several years too, so I wouldn't necessarily call that a "P&S feature."
The whole idea behind the "point and shoot" term originally was that that was just about all you could do with such a camera. No controls, no settings, no adjustments except for a few on-off things having to do with flash and self-timer. This seems to have been lost in the current popular misusage of "P&S."
Neil
acl - 24 Aug 2006 18:12 GMT > The whole "experience" of using a DSLR is totally different frfom a P&S > camera: [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > You get a proper "click" when you take the photo, rather than with a P&S > when you are never really sure when it has actually taken the shot! Well, it depends on the camera. Some of the EVF cameras are very good ergonomically, eg the minolta dimage a2 (and I suppose the a200) are really excellent (and no zoom button!). The a2 also has an excellent EVF. Ergonomically, I imagine they're comparable to others of that kind.
Their main disadvantage compared to SLRs are lack of interchangeable lenses, slower autofocus, more noise.
John Turco - 29 Aug 2006 06:06 GMT > > The main advantages of a DSLR are: > > - shallow depth of field is achievable so portraits are much more [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > Cheers - Adrian www.boliston.co.uk Hello, Adrian:
Quit ragging on P&S digicams. Despite your negative views, they're not all bland, compact models; some of the more advanced "ultra zoom" ones are quite competent and powerful, in fact.
So, please be more respectful, in the future! <g>
Cordially, John Turco <jtur@concentric.net>
John Turco - 29 Aug 2006 06:06 GMT <edited, for brevity>
> I had a Kodak DX6490 (4MP 10x zoom) for 12 months before upgrading to > the Nikon D70 for the reasons below. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > - shutter lag is non-existent. > - the lenses are sensors are bigger so you get less noise and sharper <edited>
Hello, Ben:
With the DX6490, if you want narrow DOF, on portraits, just zoom to 10x; that'll make the background extremely fuzzy.
Trust me -- I've done it! ;-)
Cordially, John Turco <jtur@concentric.net>
ASAAR - 23 Aug 2006 22:12 GMT > So I'm in the market now for a DSLR and I jsut don't know what to do. We're > definately getting either a Canon or a Nikon. We were looking at the D70s > and the 20D primarily. Then Nikon goes and announces the D80 and Canon > stops making the 20D so that kinda threw us for a loop and altered our > choices somewhat. The 30 D I'm fairly sure is out of our price range, but > should I really count out the 20D because it's been discontinued? Is the 30D really that much more expensive than the 20D? Most of the comments I've seen indicated that it was only a slight upgrade and even Canon fans seem to agree that unless they've been sorely dissatisfied with the 20D's lack of a spot meter, upgrading the 20D to a 30D probably isn't justified. On the other hand, if the choice was to be between a 20D and a 30D, the preference swings more toward the 30D. But this preference was far from unanimous, and depended on whether the 30D's additional features were justified despite its higher cost. Don't automatically rule out the 20D. There are in-depth reviews of the 30D that compare it with the 20D, and one good one is dpreview's. Don't rely too heavily on newsgroup opinions (mine included). It's better to compare features and prices and make your own decision. Note that the link below points to only the first of the review's 30 pages.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos30d/
> We're planning to go to the camera shop tonight and would like to have some > idea what we're after. Is there any real difference between the CCD and > CMOS sensors, I believe Canon uses one while Nikon uses the other. Is it > worth waiting for the D80 over the D70s? Not enough of a difference to worry about. As for the D80, I've only seen some previews, but they've been much more extensive than most previews generally are. The consensus is that the D80 offers significant improvements in many areas and should be well worth waiting for. As with the 30D review, the preview offers some comparisons of the D80 with its sibling, the D70.
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/nikond80/
> Right now we're just taking general pictures, some scenery, a lot of our > daughter (of course). This would be our 3rd camera in 17 months so we would [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > better to keep for situations were a DSLR is not really practical, or just > sell both because we'll never use them again? I've never sold old cameras. They either are used infrequently, mostly gathering dust, or become gifts. I tried to give an old Canon Powershot to a niece only to discover that she just received a camera as a Christmas gift. Her mother became the happy owner of the Powershot. :)
My choice would be to sell no more than one of the other cameras. In addition to the smaller P&S cameras being more convenient to use under some circumstances, they can be useful backups if something unfortunate happens to the DSLR and you don't have enough time to get it repaired or replaced, or if you need the use of more than one camera for some reason.
Stormlady - 23 Aug 2006 22:39 GMT >> So I'm in the market now for a DSLR and I jsut don't know what to do. >> We're [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > prices and make your own decision. Note that the link below points > to only the first of the review's 30 pages. We've gone to look at them locally, and there does seem to be a bit of a difference in price, around $400-500 if I recall correctly, that is enought right now to put it effectively out of our range.
<snip>
Kitt - 24 Aug 2006 23:12 GMT Where will it stop? BTW, did you look at the Sony with the built in Image Stabilization or the Olympus with the sensor cleaning and two lens bargain kit?
http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/2880/hands-on-canon-eos-digital-rebel-xti.html
> >> So I'm in the market now for a DSLR and I jsut don't know what to do. > >> We're [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > <snip> Roy G - 23 Aug 2006 23:51 GMT > So I'm in the market now for a DSLR and I jsut don't know what to do. > We're definately getting either a Canon or a Nikon. We were looking at [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > better to keep for situations were a DSLR is not really practical, or just > sell both because we'll never use them again? Hi.
I use a D70, and it is an excellent Camera. (I am not saying it is better than a Canon).
I have been reading the reviews fot the D80 and it looks as if it will be considerably better. More Focus points, ISO 100, larger review screen and In-camera editing as well as the 4 Mp extra resolution. The only drawback could be a delay before stocks arrive in sufficient quantities.
The D70 will probably be heavily discounted any time now, to clear stocks, so it could prove to be quite a bargain.
You have the choice, wait for a better one or get a good one for a bargain price. The money you save could get you another lens.
Roy G
frederick - 24 Aug 2006 00:13 GMT >> So I'm in the market now for a DSLR and I jsut don't know what to do. >> We're definately getting either a Canon or a Nikon. We were looking at [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > > Roy G I agree.
Do not buy a new D70s, D50, or 20d right now unless bargain priced. You expressed an interest in shooting macro. The way prices for second hand "old generation" dslr bodies seem destined to go, you could probably pick up good low shutter count second-hand D70 with a good "kit" (18-70) lens and buy a new Sigma or Tamron macro lens for less than than the price of new D80 body for which you may still have to spend many hundreds of $ on lenses. By the time the limitations of that camera body (compared to the new model(s)) become apparent to you, then the new model 10mp dslr prices will have have fallen. Nikon D70 and Canon 350d prices dropped considerably from the list prices when they were first released. Now that there are three (and soon four - with Pentax?) 10mp high quality but "entry level" dslrs to be competing for the same market, the market just got a whole lot more competitive than it was a couple of years ago. Prices will head south.
Neil Harrington - 24 Aug 2006 05:00 GMT > So I'm in the market now for a DSLR and I jsut don't know what to do. > We're definately getting either a Canon or a Nikon. We were looking at > the D70s and the 20D primarily. Then Nikon goes and announces the D80 and > Canon stops making the 20D so that kinda threw us for a loop and altered > our choices somewhat. The 30 D I'm fairly sure is out of our price range, > but should I really count out the 20D because it's been discontinued? I'd count the 20D out anyway, but that's mainly because I'm a Nikon fan. ;-)
> We're planning to go to the camera shop tonight and would like to have > some idea what we're after. Is there any real difference between the CCD > and CMOS sensors, I believe Canon uses one while Nikon uses the other. Is > it worth waiting for the D80 over the D70s? Well, that's up to you of course, but the D70s with the 18-70mm kit lens is one terrific camera. No doubt the D80 is better yet. Which to get probably depends on how you feel about the price difference. . . . Of course there will always be something better coming along later.
> Right now we're just taking general pictures, some scenery, a lot of our > daughter (of course). This would be our 3rd camera in 17 months so we [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > better to keep for situations were a DSLR is not really practical, or just > sell both because we'll never use them again? I would *definitely* keep the 5600 as long as you're happy with it. I have a D70s and also several Coolpix models, and would not sell any of 'em. The smaller cameras are very, very handy when you don't feel like carrying the much heavier and bulkier dSLR around -- which in my case is pretty often. Also, the 5600 or any other Coolpix will use the same software that you get with the D70s or D80, which simplifies things a bit.
Neil
Stewy - 25 Aug 2006 01:32 GMT > So I'm in the market now for a DSLR and I jsut don't know what to do. We're > definately getting either a Canon or a Nikon. We were looking at the D70s [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > better to keep for situations were a DSLR is not really practical, or just > sell both because we'll never use them again? What you're really asking is who has spend money buying two completely different camera systems and which do the prefer?
Why not go to the camera store and get a feel of both cameras?
What exactly do you want to do? Do you want an extremely versatile camera with interchangeable lenses but weighs a ton, is very bulky and probably needs a camera bag too to get all the extra bits and pieces you think you'll need?
Or do you want a 'near' DSLR with many of the options but few of the hassles of a true DSLR? eg the Fuji S9500, Panasonic FZ50, Sony DHC-S5 etc?
Or do you want an unobtrusive camera that fits in your pocket and is small enough to carry all the time? Probably not.
Are you going on trip where photography is the main point or is hiking/driving/sightseeing/entertainment the main point and you'd like to take a camera along?
I'm assuming 'we' means 'I'm dragging my wife/husband along too' How about talking to the spouse and listening to what he/she wants?
The only thing you're going to hear here is 'I've got a xxx and I'm really happy/totally disgusted with my camera.
Take a look at the comparison sites first - type <digital camera comparisons> into google and see what you get.
Adrian Boliston - 25 Aug 2006 10:02 GMT > I'm assuming 'we' means 'I'm dragging my wife/husband along too' How > about talking to the spouse and listening to what he/she wants? When I purchased my D70s it was a shared purchase for my partner and myself, but we soon found sharing a camera did not really "work". It was annoying to constantly have to ask each other to "give me the camera" each time you see a good shot and the other one has the camera! Photography is a lot about spontenaety and sharing a camera prevents this.
Stormlady - 25 Aug 2006 13:40 GMT ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stewy" <anyone4tennis@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 10:02 PM Subject: Re: DSLR choices?? help please
>> So I'm in the market now for a DSLR and I jsut don't know what to do. >> We're [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > Why not go to the camera store and get a feel of both cameras? We have, but having never used a dSLR before, we don't really know what we're looking for in terms of "feel"
> What exactly do you want to do? Do you want an extremely versatile > camera with interchangeable lenses but weighs a ton, is very bulky and > probably needs a camera bag too to get all the extra bits and pieces you > think you'll need? Absolutely! We already have a Kodak P850 which has some manual control, good zoom, but just can't do everything we want it to do.
> Or do you want a 'near' DSLR with many of the options but few of the > hassles of a true DSLR? eg the Fuji S9500, Panasonic FZ50, Sony DHC-S5 > etc? See above about the Kodak.
> Or do you want an unobtrusive camera that fits in your pocket and is > small enough to carry all the time? Probably not. we have a cp5600, if that was what we wanted, we wouldn't have bought the Kodak.
> Are you going on trip where photography is the main point or is > hiking/driving/sightseeing/entertainment the main point and you'd like > to take a camera along? We will be going on some trips where photography is the main point, yes. Not huge trips, but we will be going for walks/drives with the express purpose of taking pictures.
> I'm assuming 'we' means 'I'm dragging my wife/husband along too' How > about talking to the spouse and listening to what he/she wants? He is not sure either, that is why I asked for opinions. He wants either a Canon or a Nikon too, but is just not sure. I'm certainly not "dragging" him along. As a matter of fact, photography was my hobby when I bought the P850, but then he began to like having some control over his pictures and got into it too. The money to buy a dSLR came from him, and his parents lottery winnings.
> The only thing you're going to hear here is 'I've got a xxx and I'm > really happy/totally disgusted with my camera. > > Take a look at the comparison sites first - type <digital camera > comparisons> into google and see what you get. We've done that too, but it still leaves unsure which camera to get.
Adrian Boliston - 25 Aug 2006 14:32 GMT > He is not sure either, that is why I asked for opinions. He wants either > a Canon or a Nikon too, but is just not sure. I'm certainly not > "dragging" him along. As a matter of fact, photography was my hobby when > I bought the P850, but then he began to like having some control over his > pictures and got into it too. The money to buy a dSLR came from him, and > his parents lottery winnings. Lottery winnings? Ask to have a look and feel of a D2Xs or D2Hs complete with 12-24 F4, 17-55 F2.8 & 70-200 2.8 VR :-)
Stormlady - 25 Aug 2006 15:43 GMT >> He is not sure either, that is why I asked for opinions. He wants either >> a Canon or a Nikon too, but is just not sure. I'm certainly not [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Lottery winnings? Ask to have a look and feel of a D2Xs or D2Hs complete > with 12-24 F4, 17-55 F2.8 & 70-200 2.8 VR :-) Not quite that much lottery winnings for us, unfortunately.
mexican_equivalent@yahoo.com - 25 Aug 2006 11:56 GMT > So I'm in the market now for a DSLR and I jsut don't know what to do. We're > definately getting either a Canon or a Nikon. We were looking at the D70s If I were you, I'd just wait until September and pick up the just-announced Digital Rebel XTi (400D). It's basically an upgraded 350D with some of the features from the 20D (9-point autofocus) plus some other perks (Dust removal and 10 megapixel sensor!).
Price is going to be $900 for the kit set, or $800 for the body only. Lots of people have nothing bad bad things to say about the kit lens. A good idea would be to buy the $800 body only, and a cheap prime lens like the EF 50mm f1.4 (approx $300). You won't have zoom, but the image quality will on par with some of Canon's best zoom lenses that cost over a thousand dollars.
Adrian Boliston - 25 Aug 2006 12:31 GMT > If I were you, I'd just wait until September and pick up the > just-announced Digital Rebel XTi (400D). It's basically an upgraded [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > image quality will on par with some of Canon's best zoom lenses that > cost over a thousand dollars. I'm not sure I'd want the equivalent of *just* an 80mm lens unless I was an avid portrait photographer who never really did other types of photography!
Rick Geyerman - 26 Aug 2006 05:02 GMT >> So I'm in the market now for a DSLR and I jsut don't know what to do. >> We're [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > image quality will on par with some of Canon's best zoom lenses that > cost over a thousand dollars. How would I figure out if the lens for my Canon (film) EOS Rebel will fit this body?
Thanks, Rick
Bill - 26 Aug 2006 15:30 GMT >> If I were you, I'd just wait until September and pick up the >> just-announced Digital Rebel XTi (400D). It's basically an upgraded [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >How would I figure out if the lens for my Canon (film) EOS Rebel will fit >this body? The new Rebel XTi will take all EF and EF-S lenses, so your film lenses from any EOS camera will fit just fine.
|
|
|