>Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>wonder if someone of you knows why I can't use new batteries (I suspect
>now it's a problem related to the camera). Thank you.
Batteries that were bought "one or two years ago" aren't new.
Probably, one or more of the "new" batteries are bad. Buy a new set,
and try them.
Much less expensive than buying a new camera.

Signature
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
nig - 14 Apr 2006 17:41 GMT
Sorry for the misunderstanding, but yes the batteries are new, I've
bought more than one set and I have always the same problem. Moreover a
friend of mine has the same equal problem with another PhotoPC 800.
Thank you.
> I've an old photo PC 800 bought in 2000. Well, one or two years ago
> the original batteries seem to be definitively dead. So I bought new
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> wonder if someone of you knows why I can't use new batteries (I suspect
> now it's a problem related to the camera). Thank you.
Any camera that old that uses AA batteries probably had poor
battery life right from the beginning. It should be better than 4
to 5 shots thought. Do you recall what it was (20, 40, 60, etc.).
The way cameras are used can greatly shorten the number of shots you
can get from your batteries. Some of these include not enabling a
power-off timeout, keeping the LCD display turned on, using a high
percentage of flash shots, and enabling Auto-Focus Mode if your
camera has that feature. Your battery charger may also be
malfunctioning. If you don't mind wasting a few AA alkalines, try
taking as many shots as you can get from them without using the
camera's flash. However many shots you get, figure that NiMH
batteries should provide 2 to 3 times more shots than that if
they've been properly charged. This should let you know if your
camera is working well or not.
Just to let you know in case you aren't aware, some of the P&S
cameras manufactured in the last year or two can get up to 500 shots
from AA NiMH batteries with the LCD turned on with many of the shots
using the flash, and 1,500 shots per charge if the LCD is turned off
and the flash isn't used. If there's nothing wrong with your Epson
PC800 it may continue providing decent pictures for a long time.
But cameras have improved in the last 6 years, and some of the
current models not only perform *much* better (shorter shutter
delays, etc.) but also produce better pictures.
nig - 15 Apr 2006 01:29 GMT
Thank you.
The behavior isn't normal, with the original batteries included I could
take a lot of photos using the LCD too. I bought new batteries because
I thought the original batteries were dead for ever. But I'm just
starting to think of it isn't a problem of batteries but a problem with
the camera. Infact it's strange that the friend of mine has the same
problem and we bought the camera togheter. However I know, I've to buy
a new camera, Epson PC Photo 800 was a great camera (It was quite
expansive in 2000) even if I missed a lot an optical zoom feature.
yui - 30 Apr 2006 12:18 GMT
nig
> Thank you.
> The behavior isn't normal, with the original batteries included I could
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> a new camera, Epson PC Photo 800 was a great camera (It was quite
> expansive in 2000) even if I missed a lot an optical zoom feature.
i have the same problem with my photopc 800 :(