 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / Digital Photography / Digital Photo / November 2006Raw converter for Nokon D200
Hi, Can anyone please give me some recommendations for RAW conversion software for the Nikon D200. Thanks ! Graham Hi Raw Essentials from Pixmantec is free and very good and easy to use. You can download it at: http://www.pixmantec.com/ Mike >Hi > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >http://www.pixmantec.com/ Nope the free version does not support the D200. Adobe Camera Raw 3.3 does so that allows PSE3 and 4 and PS CS2 at least. Then there's the latest version of Nikon Capture. ________________________________________________________ Ed Ruf Lifetime AMA# 344007 (Usenet@EdwardG.Ruf.com) See images taken with my CP-990/5700 & D70 at http://EdwardGRuf.com >Hi, > Can anyone please give me some recommendations for RAW conversion >software >for the Nikon D200. I like Bibble from http://bibblelabs.com/ I don't have a D200 yet, but it does work great with my D2x. Bibble was one of the first to support the D200. Peter if you have a Mac check out Graphic ConverterX V5.7.5, 30USD shareware and may have come bundled with a recent Mac so you can try it out first. >if you have a Mac check out Graphic ConverterX V5.7.5, 30USD shareware >and may have come bundled with a recent Mac so you can try it out first. Even if I had a Mac would I use Bibble. Its available for Windows, Mac OS X and Linux- Peter Please forgive this dumb question but if you open it in Photoshop or Capture or NX cant you then save it in what ever format you want, why buy software that converts ? Or did I misunderstand and software like bible are a cheaper solution than photoshop ??? >>Hi, >> Can anyone please give me some recommendations for RAW conversion [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >Peter Nikon Capture NX can save an edited file as a NEF file. PhotoShop and any other photo editor can not save as NEF. Also Capture NX will handle NEF files better than other programs. > Please forgive this dumb question but if you open it in Photoshop or > Capture or NX cant you then save it in what ever format you want, why [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > > >Peter Thanks George. I purchased NX today, and already own Capture 4.4 thanks for the update. Would seem that most then would prefer to use NX to work on the file and only use Photoshop when they are happy and ready to perhaps move the photo to lets say JPG. Thanks for your explanation. >Nikon Capture NX can save an edited file as a NEF file. PhotoShop and >any other photo editor can not save as NEF. Also Capture NX will handle [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >> > >> >Peter Here is a link to a comparison of various programs that can process Nikon RAW files. http://www.nikonians.org/dcforum/DCForumID36/16777.html It shows why one would use more than one image processor. > Thanks George. I purchased NX today, and already own Capture 4.4 > thanks for the update. Would seem that most then would prefer to use [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > >> > > >> >Peter Great link, before I read all these. Why does the Nikon capture look so much better than Bibble ? what a difference. >Here is a link to a comparison of various programs that can process >Nikon RAW files. [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] >> >> > >> >> >Peter The programers Nikon uses need only optimize their code for the Nikon products and have access to the Nikon enginers while the programers for the 3rd party products have to code for many more cameras and only have access to the System Development Disk, SDK, routines and documentation. Which means the Nikon programers can produce a better product. > Great link, before I read all these. Why does the Nikon capture look > so much better than Bibble ? what a difference. [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > >> >> > > >> >> >Peter |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.