Um....they call the dual lens camera...that is a clue. One lens does the
wide angle and another does the tele. The user does not select the software
makes it seamless to move from one to the other.

Signature
Thanks,
Gene Palmiter
(visit my photo gallery at http://palmiter.dotphoto.com)
freebridge design group
> v570; What did Kodak give up to accomplish the flat telephoto?
> Anything?
hfs2 - 31 Jan 2006 04:15 GMT
Ummmm anyone else?
tomm42 - 31 Jan 2006 13:50 GMT
Imaging resource has a review on this camera, quite nifty, the lenses
are internal and sideways in the camera. A prism (or mirror) is what
you see looking from the outside. The problem with the camera according
to IR is that they try to cover the focal lengths between 23 and 39
with digital zoom, or masking the sensor. So at a 38mm equivalent focal
length you have 1.7mp instead of 5mp. Imaging Resource suggested to
turn off that option and use your feet.
Tom
Gene Palmiter - 31 Jan 2006 22:13 GMT
What? You don't like my answer. I read it in my local paper the day before.
Here is a link...
http://www.mcall.com/technology/all-mossberg127jan27,0,1374041.story
Its this camera?
http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=7402&pq-locale=en_US&CMP=KN
C-8P3E53373771

Signature
Thanks,
Gene Palmiter
(visit my photo gallery at http://palmiter.dotphoto.com)
freebridge design group
> Um....they call the dual lens camera...that is a clue. One lens does the
> wide angle and another does the tele. The user does not select the
> software makes it seamless to move from one to the other.
>
>> v570; What did Kodak give up to accomplish the flat telephoto?
>> Anything?