Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / Digital Photo / January 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Should I fire this guy because he bought his degree from the internet?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ZergZergLOL@gmail.com - 16 Jan 2006 21:09 GMT
Hey guys, I posted this on another board and the verdict I got was to
fire him. Since I've been lurking here for a while I thought I'd post
it here for some more advice.

A couple years ago I hired a guy named Thomas as a senior tech for a
small data center I run in California. He always seemed like a pretty
competent worker. Thomas had great personal skills, came into work
on-time, and pretty much completed projects better than any of the
other techs in our facility. He seemed like a pretty intelligent guy,
actually. On occasion I've even had dinner with his wife and young
daughter who's going through chemo. I generally consider Thomas a
friend.

The other day I invited him to my house to hang out and have a few
drinks. At one point in the evening we were shooting the sh.t and
talking about the worst things we've ever done in our lives. I
regaled him with a tale about how I stole expensive clothes from
department stores as a teenager and he told me about how he once sent
explicit pictures of his cheating ex-girlfriend sodomizing a toothbrush
to her parents. I laughed and passed him another drink.

I guess he was getting a little too tipsy because a little later he
related a story about how he got his college degree in philosophy. We
don't require college degrees, but we generally hire and give greater
pay to candidates with the degree over the candidate without one.
Thomas said that he bought it off the internet for $450 from some
website called "The Transnational Council" for something something. He
wrote the domain http://www.tcge.org on a napkin and said that he had
listed the degree he got through them on the resume he sent my
secretary two years ago. I've heard this website discussed on some
other message boards before. Apparently they represent universities who
grant degrees based on previous college credits, work history, and
military/life experience. Now I don't know what to do. Company policy
is to terminate people who lie on their resumes, but he doesn't seem
like that bad of a guy. The website he got his degree from looks like
what they're doing is pretty unethical since there's no coursework
involved. But I guess the degree is technically legal. Should I fire
him because he bought his degree from the internet instead of attending
a regular university?

What he did was pretty crooked. I think I'll decide to go ahead and
fire him over this. If you were his employer what would you do?
John Burke - 16 Jan 2006 21:16 GMT
Please go f.ck yourself.
Unclaimed Mysteries - 16 Jan 2006 22:13 GMT
> Please go f.ck yourself.

How come you didn't say "please" to me?

Signature

It Came From C. L. Smith's Unclaimed Mysteries.
http://www.unclaimedmysteries.net

MrB - 17 Jan 2006 00:52 GMT
Yes, PLEASE.

> Please go f.ck yourself.
Tony - 16 Jan 2006 21:38 GMT
Should we care because you are an idiot? If you hired him without checking
his resume you deserve whatever you get. Aholes like you are the reason why
4 out of 5 businesses go under quite rapidly and you are so stupid you'll
never figure out why.

Signature

http://www.chapelhillnoir.com
home of The Camera-ist's Manifesto
The Improved Links Pages are at
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/links/mlinks00.html
A sample chapter from  "Haight-Ashbury" is at
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/writ/hait/hatitl.html

> Hey guys, I posted this on another board and the verdict I got was to
> fire him. Since I've been lurking here for a while I thought I'd post
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> What he did was pretty crooked. I think I'll decide to go ahead and
> fire him over this. If you were his employer what would you do?
Paul Rubin - 16 Jan 2006 21:46 GMT
> Should we care because you are an idiot? If you hired him without checking
> his resume you deserve whatever you get. Aholes like you are the reason why
> 4 out of 5 businesses go under quite rapidly and you are so stupid you'll
> never figure out why.

The person is a spammer, that's why there's that url in the middle.
(I didn't click on it.)
Paul J Gans - 17 Jan 2006 18:50 GMT
>> Should we care because you are an idiot? If you hired him without checking
>> his resume you deserve whatever you get. Aholes like you are the reason why
>> 4 out of 5 businesses go under quite rapidly and you are so stupid you'll
>> never figure out why.

>The person is a spammer, that's why there's that url in the middle.
>(I didn't click on it.)

Of course.  If he was serious he'd be talking to a lawyer
not a bunch of wild and crazy photography nuts some with
hangups about plastic....   ;-)

  ----- Paul J. Gans
Mark² - 16 Jan 2006 22:13 GMT
> Should we care because you are an idiot? If you hired him without
> checking his resume you deserve whatever you get. Aholes like you are
> the reason why 4 out of 5 businesses go under quite rapidly and you
> are so stupid you'll never figure out why.

I think this was merely spam, Tony...trying to get people to click on the
included link.
It's actually a rather creative approach, since it's very indirect.
Spam, nonetheless...

>> Hey guys, I posted this on another board and the verdict I got was to
>> fire him. Since I've been lurking here for a while I thought I'd post
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>> explicit pictures of his cheating ex-girlfriend sodomizing a
>> toothbrush to her parents. I laughed and passed him another drink.
nascar20fan@nascar.com - 17 Dec 2006 05:07 GMT
>Should we care because you are an idiot? If you hired him without checking
>his resume you deserve whatever you get. Aholes like you are the reason why
>4 out of 5 businesses go under quite rapidly and you are so stupid you'll
>never figure out why.

While I agree this ounds like a SPAM post, there are many major
colleges hat give credirs for military experience. I went through a
major university, and after 17 years in the military (I did do the
other 3 and retire) I only had to do 9 courses for my associates. They
give credits for the schools done in the military, which are a lot
harder then regular courses are in college, due to the technical level
they get into. But then there are also schools that get no credits,
due to the classification level.
Ken Lucke - 17 Dec 2006 17:42 GMT
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

> >Should we care because you are an idiot? If you hired him without checking
> >his resume you deserve whatever you get. Aholes like you are the reason why
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> they get into. But then there are also schools that get no credits,
> due to the classification level.

Uhm, any particular reason why you are replying to a 11-month old post?
:^)

Signature

You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a
reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating
the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for
independence.
       -- Charles A. Beard

John Turco - 19 Dec 2006 06:10 GMT
>      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Uhm, any particular reason why you are replying to a 11-month old post?
> :^)

Hello, Ken:

That's not the only ancient article that "nascar20fan@nascar.com"
has dug up, lately, either. His news browser needs to "catch up,"
it seems. <g>

Cordially,
          John Turco <jtur@concentric.net>
Ken Lucke - 19 Dec 2006 19:47 GMT
<snippage of much irrelvant stuff, something many posters need to learn>

> > Uhm, any particular reason why you are replying to a 11-month old post?
> > :^)
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> has dug up, lately, either. His news browser needs to "catch up,"
> it seems. <g>

Yeah, I saw that.  I was hoping a single nudge might teach him to look
at the dates of stuff before just hitting "Reply".   Sometimes it's not
the browser, though - some weird things can happen to newsspools on the
server, it dishing up old articles that have long expired as if they
were new if another server offers it to it after it's expired locally.
I've seen it happen on my own news servers back when I was admining
one.

Heh.  I always look at the date (original, and any quotes), the
newsgroups (to see if they need trimming, too), and I also usually try
to read several replies into the thread to see if the answer I'm about
to give has already been given, so as to not repeat the same thing that
three or four others have already written.

Guess some of that comes from habit of being online back when a 300
baud Hayes Smartcom modem over a dialup phone line [with LD charges
racking up by the full minute] were standard.  I found this cute site
that I could relate to a while back:
http://dir.salon.com/story/tech/feature/2002/05/31/back_in_the_day/index.
html

Signature

You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a
reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating
the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for
independence.
       -- Charles A. Beard

John Turco - 23 Dec 2006 05:04 GMT
<edited, foe brevity>

> Heh.  I always look at the date (original, and any quotes), the
> newsgroups (to see if they need trimming, too), and I also usually try
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> http://dir.salon.com/story/tech/feature/2002/05/31/back_in_the_day/index.
> html

<edited>

Hello, Ken:

I first "connected," in January of 1996, using the "Prodigy" free-trial
software that had come installed on my original PC (a Pionex 486DX2
66MHz). The computer's generic modem was only 2400kbps, but I replaced
it with a Cardinal MVP144 (14.4kbps), within a couple of months; it was
one of several such upgrades, intended to improve my online speed.

Soon, I would discover various BBSes (bulletin board systems) and
inadvertently rack up some hefty long-distance phone charges. In
February of '96, I stumbled upon my current ISP (Concentric). Since
then, I've received unlimited Internet access for $19.95 USD a month,
and have been extremely satisfied with its dial-up service, overall.

Cardinal and Pionex both folded (in '99 and '00, respectively), alas.

Cordially,
          John Turco <jtur@concentric.net>
Ron Hunter - 23 Dec 2006 09:03 GMT
> <edited, foe brevity>
>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> Cordially,
>            John Turco <jtur@concentric.net>

Aren't you about ready to move up to broadband?  It lends a whole new
meaning to 'connected'.  If you can, give it a try.
John Turco - 24 Dec 2006 04:40 GMT
<edited, for brevity>

> > I first "connected," in January of 1996, using the "Prodigy" free-trial
> > software that had come installed on my original PC (a Pionex 486DX2
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Aren't you about ready to move up to broadband?  It lends a whole new
> meaning to 'connected'.  If you can, give it a try.

Hello, Ron:

I'm "ready," certainly; "willing," there's no doubt; it's the "able"
part, that's still hanging me up. :-P

Honestly, if broadband ever approaches the price of dial-up, I'll
probably give it a go.

Cordially,  
          John Turco <jtur@concentric.net>
Ron Hunter - 24 Dec 2006 08:49 GMT
> <edited, for brevity>
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> Cordially,  
>            John Turco <jtur@concentric.net>

There are some options that come close.  The local cable provider
(Charter) offers a $29.95 (regular price) connection that is
384kbpz/128kbps.  It also offers this package for $19.95 for the first
three months.  As always, cable is month-to-month, so if you don't like
(or can afford) it, you can cancel.  WARNING once you use broadband
internet, you will probably never want to use dialup again!
With the always on connection, the internet becomes a quick, immediate,
way to get information.  I can watch 'Who Wants to be a Millionaire',
and get answers from Google before the contestant comes up with an
answer.  Try that on dialup.
John Turco - 30 Dec 2006 03:54 GMT
<edited, for brevity>

> >> Aren't you about ready to move up to broadband?  It lends a whole new
> >> meaning to 'connected'.  If you can, give it a try.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> and get answers from Google before the contestant comes up with an
> answer.  Try that on dialup.

Hello, Ron:

Oh, I've seen those types of offers, from Cox cable, here. I simply
don't like the idea they'll raise their subscription rates, after so
many months of service.

Obviously, Concentric won't do that, because dial-up's only present
advantage over broadband, is its significantly lower cost. Plus, I'm
reluctant to change my e-mail address, which I'd be forced to do, if I
switched ISP's.

Hence, Concentric may be excruciatingly slow, but it's cheap and
reliable, which isn't a bad combination, at that. <g>

Cordially,
          John Turco <jtur@concentric.net>
Ron Hunter - 30 Dec 2006 09:12 GMT
> <edited, for brevity>
>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> Cordially,
>            John Turco <jtur@concentric.net>

If cost is the main concern, then dialup is very attractive.  However,
if you can afford $10 more a month, then even the lowest tier of service
available here (384kbps/128kbps) is a vastly better deal on a per byte
basis, and being connected all the time makes the internet an
'information appliance', which is one of the main uses I make of it.
Bill Funk - 30 Dec 2006 15:42 GMT
>Obviously, Concentric won't do that, because dial-up's only present
>advantage over broadband, is its significantly lower cost. Plus, I'm
>reluctant to change my e-mail address, which I'd be forced to do, if I
>switched ISP's.

The email thing is easily fixed, with a one-time change: get your own
domain, and for as little as $60/year or less, have the domain hosted.
You'll have your own email you can keep forever, no matter who your
ISP is.
As for ther $60/year, most spend that much on their coffee (err, laté)
and/or drinks each month. Not to mention those who smoke.
Signature

Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"

John Turco - 31 Dec 2006 15:32 GMT
> >Obviously, Concentric won't do that, because dial-up's only present
> >advantage over broadband, is its significantly lower cost. Plus, I'm
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Bill Funk
> replace "g" with "a"

Hello, Bill:

Don't drink or smoke. I do enjoy coffee, about once a week...and even
then, nothing fancy.

Colombian, all the way, baby! :-J

Cordially,
          John Turco <jtur@concentric.net>
Stewy - 01 Jan 2007 00:21 GMT
> > >Obviously, Concentric won't do that, because dial-up's only present
> > >advantage over broadband, is its significantly lower cost. Plus, I'm
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Colombian, all the way, baby! :-J

Good grief! I drink, smoke, inhale that stuff Bill Clinton denied
taking.

Don't you have any vices at all?
John Turco - 06 Jan 2007 06:20 GMT
<edited, for brevity>

> > Don't drink or smoke. I do enjoy coffee, about once a week...and even
> > then, nothing fancy.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Good grief! I drink, smoke, inhale that stuff Bill Clinton denied
> taking.

Hello, Stewy:

I've never tried weed, personally.

> Don't you have any vices at all?

Why, of course, I do; Coca-Cola and Kodak, are my demons! <G>

Cordially,
          John Turco <jtur@concentric.net>
Ron Hunter - 06 Jan 2007 10:13 GMT
> <edited, for brevity>
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Cordially,
>            John Turco <jtur@concentric.net>

I have lots.  Dr. Pepper (only 1/day these days though), chocolate chip
cookies, reading, and, posting to newsgroups....  But you all knew that.
Stewy - 09 Jan 2007 11:05 GMT
> > <edited, for brevity>
> >
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> I have lots.  Dr. Pepper (only 1/day these days though), chocolate chip
> cookies, reading, and, posting to newsgroups....  But you all knew that.

Dr Pepper and Coca Cola are OFF the menu since I reached 100kg, besides
the demon weed lasts longer.
Doug Robbins - 18 Dec 2006 12:18 GMT
Won't you still be a brainless turkey?

>>Should we care because you are an idiot? If you hired him without checking
>>his resume you deserve whatever you get. Aholes like you are the reason
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> they get into. But then there are also schools that get no credits,
> due to the classification level.
Ray Fischer - 16 Jan 2006 22:00 GMT
>Hey guys, I posted this on another board and the verdict I got was to
>fire him. Since I've been lurking here for a while I thought I'd post
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>What he did was pretty crooked. I think I'll decide to go ahead and
>fire him over this. If you were his employer what would you do?

If you fire him then you should fire yourself for not checking his
references when you were considering hiring him and for firing a good
worker because of your screwup.

Signature

Ray Fischer        
rfischer@sonic.net  

Gormless - 16 Jan 2006 22:25 GMT
> explicit pictures of his cheating ex-girlfriend sodomizing a toothbrush

How can a girl sodomise anything? Only you boys can sodomise.  In your case,
it's probably yourself.

> wrote the domain http://www.shite.org on a napkin and said that he had

Ah, we get to the point - this is spam isn't it?
Gene Palmiter - 16 Jan 2006 23:20 GMT
Not necessisarily. There are some schools that can offer legitimate degrees
by this method. Lots of military people use them since they are seldom in
one place long enough to go to just one university. They give credit for
military courses, CLEP exams, etc. Regents College of the University of New
York is one such.

He may not have lied. He says he has a degree and he does. If it was
important to you then you could have checked to see if it was a accredited
and with whom it was accredited.

Signature

Thanks,
Gene Palmiter
(visit my photo gallery at http://palmiter.dotphoto.com)
freebridge design group

> Hey guys, I posted this on another board and the verdict I got was to
> fire him. Since I've been lurking here for a while I thought I'd post
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> What he did was pretty crooked. I think I'll decide to go ahead and
> fire him over this. If you were his employer what would you do?
Harry Limey - 17 Jan 2006 18:57 GMT
> Not necessisarily. There are some schools that can offer legitimate
> degrees by this method. Lots of military people use them since they are
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> important to you then you could have checked to see if it was a accredited
> and with whom it was accredited.

Hey Gene
You are writing to a spammer who is targeting over 10 newsgroups with this
message (and of course you are copying his entire message and website
address) Do you really think he is going to care what you think, or even
know that you have replied?
Gene Palmiter - 17 Jan 2006 23:27 GMT
If I wanted to communicate with just one person I would email. Someone may
learn something from the thread and from what we each can offer....even what
you offer.

Signature

Thanks,
Gene Palmiter
(visit my photo gallery at http://palmiter.dotphoto.com)
freebridge design group

>> Not necessisarily. There are some schools that can offer legitimate
>> degrees by this method. Lots of military people use them since they are
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> address) Do you really think he is going to care what you think, or even
> know that you have replied?
Dogfart - 21 Jan 2006 04:41 GMT
> What he did was pretty crooked. I think I'll decide to go ahead and
> fire him over this. If you were his employer what would you do?

Promote him and double his pay.

Can I get a degree in Divinity and make millions from suckers from that same
"university"?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.