Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / Digital Photo / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Digital Camera Review Sites - What about us ?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Kevin K - 28 Mar 2005 22:13 GMT
I see alot of post about digital camera review sites but I never see
anyone point to us?

Digital Camera Reviews - http://www.camera-reviews.net
Scott W - 28 Mar 2005 22:21 GMT
I looked at your site and to me it looks more like ads then reviews.
I looked at the "review" for the 20D, it just looked like a spec sheet
with a link as to where to buy
it.

Did I miss something?

Scott
Kevin K - 28 Mar 2005 22:30 GMT
I appologize scott I will update the page for you if it doesn't have
enough information.

As you know their are thousands of cameras on the market it takes time
to do a quality review of each one.  Maybe you better stick to dpreview
then with 100,000 pages of forums then if you want that kind of
interaction.

In regards to " Did I miss something? "

I would suggest you missed the point your mother made earlier in life
about if you don't have anything nice to say don't say anything at all?

Regards, Kevin Katovic
Scott W - 28 Mar 2005 22:38 GMT
> I appologize scott I will update the page for you if it doesn't have
> enough information.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I would suggest you missed the point your mother made earlier in life
> about if you don't have anything nice to say don't say anything at all?

You did seem to be asking why nobody referred to your site, I told you
why I though this was so, or was that a rhetorical question you asked?

Scott
Kevin K - 28 Mar 2005 22:46 GMT
Thanks for the opinions, What do you suggest I do to make my site more
proffessonal so I can add to my credibility as a authority site other
than the semantics of ranking terms on search engines ext.  Lets say I
only can spend 6 hours a day doing so with articles and I am one person
and can only type at 40 wpm and my spelling is horrible and I can't
afford a proof reader.
philjackson - 29 Mar 2005 00:23 GMT
maybe your in the wrong business then

> Thanks for the opinions, What do you suggest I do to make my site more
> proffessonal so I can add to my credibility as a authority site other
> than the semantics of ranking terms on search engines ext.  Lets say I
> only can spend 6 hours a day doing so with articles and I am one person
> and can only type at 40 wpm and my spelling is horrible and I can't
> afford a proof reader.
Eric Gill - 29 Mar 2005 01:10 GMT
> Thanks for the opinions, What do you suggest I do to make my site more
> proffessonal so I can add to my credibility as a authority site other
> than the semantics of ranking terms on search engines ext.

The easiest way is to have something substantial on your site.

In fact, that's the only way. If you've got nothing to offer, you have no
authority, and no traffic.

<snip>
Matt Silberstein - 29 Mar 2005 06:19 GMT
>Thanks for the opinions, What do you suggest I do to make my site more
>proffessonal so I can add to my credibility as a authority site other
>than the semantics of ranking terms on search engines ext.  Lets say I
>only can spend 6 hours a day doing so with articles and I am one person
>and can only type at 40 wpm and my spelling is horrible and I can't
>afford a proof reader.

Get a more pleasant on-line personality. I know I am not going to
bother to look at your site.

Signature

Matt Silberstein

All in all, if I could be any animal, I would want to be
a duck or a goose. They can fly, walk, and swim. Plus,
there there is a certain satisfaction knowing that at the
end of your life you will taste good with an orange sauce
or, in the case of a goose, a chestnut stuffing.

Confused - 29 Mar 2005 07:10 GMT
Matt writes:

> All in all, if I could be any animal, I would want to be
> a duck or a goose. They can fly, walk, and swim. Plus,
> there there is a certain satisfaction knowing that at the
> end of your life you will taste good with an orange sauce
> or, in the case of a goose, a chestnut stuffing.

If I could be any animal, I'd be me.  Heh...

Jeff
Iain Laskey - 31 Mar 2005 21:35 GMT
> I would suggest you missed the point your mother made earlier in life
> about if you don't have anything nice to say don't say anything at all?
Oh purleeze....

Iain
Matt Silberstein - 31 Mar 2005 22:22 GMT
[snip]

>I would suggest you missed the point your mother made earlier in life
>about if you don't have anything nice to say don't say anything at all?

As Alice Roosevelt put it, if you can't say anything nice about
someone, come and sit next to me.

Signature

Matt Silberstein

All in all, if I could be any animal, I would want to be
a duck or a goose. They can fly, walk, and swim. Plus,
there there is a certain satisfaction knowing that at the
end of your life you will taste good with an orange sauce
or, in the case of a goose, a chestnut stuffing.

SeaShel - 28 Mar 2005 22:31 GMT
> I see alot of post about digital camera review sites but I never see
> anyone point to us?
>
> Digital Camera Reviews - http://www.camera-reviews.net

I tried to give it a fair look, but the brand links were broken, no mention
of the Rebel XT save the Amazon ad, and there are lots more informative
sites out there.  If you are out for site and eBay hits, it's okay, I guess,
but as a competitive review site, it's not even solid.  :(

---
Michelle
(SeaShel)

free the fish to reply
Mark B. - 29 Mar 2005 00:42 GMT
>I see alot of post about digital camera review sites but I never see
> anyone point to us?
>
> Digital Camera Reviews - http://www.camera-reviews.net

Gotta agree with Scott.  Looks more like cut & pasted specs and press
releases than actual reviews, with a bunch of buy links.

Mark
meow - 29 Mar 2005 01:16 GMT
You might advertise as a one stop spec. pages of digital cameras

>I see alot of post about digital camera review sites but I never see
> anyone point to us?
>
> Digital Camera Reviews - http://www.camera-reviews.net
Kevin K - 29 Mar 2005 01:27 GMT
<quote>
> You might advertise as a one stop spec. pages of digital
cameras</quote>

> >I see alot of post about digital camera review sites but I never see
> > anyone point to us?
> >
> > Digital Camera Reviews - http://www.camera-reviews.net

I was also thinking of maybe setting up a bananna stand on a few pages
and writing free press releases for the premium banana review site do
you think I may have the qualifications necessary.  I realize I need to
come up with some better reviews but do you think that this might get
my site past the growing pains a new site faces ?

Thank you all for all the helpfull advice !
Scott W - 29 Mar 2005 01:43 GMT
> <quote>
> > You might advertise as a one stop spec. pages of digital
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Thank you all for all the helpfull advice !

If you are going to review bananas don't forget the apple banana, they
are the best.

Seriously you seem to have a real attitude problem, you come here with
something that is not much beyond spam and you get mad when people tell
you that they don't see much beyond specs and ads.  Take a few deep
breaths and think about whether this is something you really want to
do.

You did not come here saying that you had the start of a web page how
did people like it so far, you came here wanting to know why your site
is not referenced, implying that you thought it was up to the same
caliber as the other sites and should be sighted as a reference, well
we have told you why it is not used as a reference and now you can
either fix it or live with it the way it is.  BTW people may try to
help you with how to improve your site but you need to be aware that
they are not at all obligated to do so.

And don't forget the apple banana, they really are good.

Scott
Kevin K - 29 Mar 2005 02:04 GMT
Well I take offense to the implication that it is spam as some
webmasters have found they had to eat their words.

http://www.chillingeffects.org/acpa/notice.cgi?NoticeID=1526&print=yes

I take offense to the thought that I would " Spam "

You might want to choose your words more carefully as I see piles of
crap posted in this group that has nothing to do with digital imaging
or anything else to do with photography.

At least mine is right on target with what this forum is about nice
friendly photographers sharing their experiences and knowledge.
Scott W - 29 Mar 2005 02:24 GMT
> Well I take offense to the implication that it is spam as some
> webmasters have found they had to eat their words.

http://www.chillingeffects.org/acpa/notice.cgi?NoticeID=1526&print=yes

> I take offense to the thought that I would " Spam "

Are you saying that Hormel Foods Corporation is going to go after me
for saying that you were not far from spaming? I think they would be
going after a LOT of people in that case, there are 54,300,000
references to spam on the internet, at least the ones that google knows
about.

I am sorry but I stand by what I said at the beginning, what I see is
mostly ads.

Scott
KennyJr - 29 Mar 2005 02:12 GMT
[snip]

> Thank you all for all the helpfull advice !

Since you don't have a lot of time to spend reviewing cameras then
perhaps you could create a page pointing people to digicam and digicam
related sites. Some places to put on the page would be review sites,
digicam related forums, how-to pages, manufacters pages, photo editor
pages etc.
Kevin K - 29 Mar 2005 02:24 GMT
Honest it was the spell checker. rotflmao
Kevin K - 29 Mar 2005 02:33 GMT
I thought this was great advice so I think the first thing I will do is
go to google.com and link to the " I just picked one " lets say the 3rd
site and I will link to him,  the guys site is just great and he seems
to be a real gentlemen.

http://www.google.com/search?complete=1&hl=en&q=digicam+reviews&btnG=Google+Search
Julian  Tan - 29 Mar 2005 04:12 GMT
Just a few tips Kevin, from one digital photography site owner to
another.

I agree with Erin regarding getting some quality content on your site.
Simply rehashing press releases and product brochures and passing them
off as "reviews" will probably get you nowhere.  People are after hands
on information about the cameras.  i.e. what did it feel like in
outdoor usage, how responsive were the functions, what the image
quality was like, ergonomics and other features... instead of just
"this camera has X megapixels and X zoom and functions X, Y and Z."

Alternatively, you could follow KennyJR's point about being a reference
site and linking to reviews from other sites.  Oh but wait - that's
already been done.  (www.dcviews.com).  :D

Cheers,
Julian
Shuttertalk
Owner and Editor-in-Chief
http://www.shuttertalk.com - the friendliest digital photography forums
on the net!
Steven M. Scharf - 29 Mar 2005 07:05 GMT
"Kevin K" <info@bargainfindsonebay.com> wrote in message

> I was also thinking of maybe setting up a bananna stand on a few pages
> and writing free press releases for the premium banana review site do
> you think I may have the qualifications necessary.  I realize I need to
> come up with some better reviews but do you think that this might get
> my site past the growing pains a new site faces ?

You need to try to provide some information that the established sites have
overlooked. When I was looking for a digital slr I found that no site
adequately addressed all the considerations and trade-offs that needed to be
made, no site had an easy to compare table of features, and too many of the
review sites were terrified to say anything bad about a specific model, for
fear of offending advertisers. So I took the spreadsheet I had made up and
added to it, and it became a web site. When people started complaining that
I had ranked what they had purchased too low, I knew that I was doing
something right!

It looks like your site's goal is simply to get Amazon referral fees. But
people are annoyed when it's so obvious, and will not click through. I've
been pleasantly surprised with the few hundred dollars in referral fees that
I've gotten from my site, given that it's relatively new, but the prime goal
of the site was not to make a living, and I'm happy with a couple of hundred
dollars per quarter in fees.

Don't get too excited about the apparent number of hits. Hundreds, and even
thousands of those hits are from automated bots that classify pages. I was
shocked to see the number of hits to my sites until I realized what was
going on.

Steve
http://digitalslrinfo.com
YANewsreader - 29 Mar 2005 02:08 GMT
> I see alot of post about digital camera review sites but I never see
> anyone point to us?
>
> Digital Camera Reviews - http://www.camera-reviews.net

I've copied your URL into my Bookmarks, thanks.

BTW, you might like to include a more obvious contact link. I noticed a
typo on the first page (Key points) I went to...FZ20's have a hot shoe,
not a horse shoe. And their most important Key Point, the Image
Stabilizer, doesn't get a mention at all.

Signature

YAnewsreader
<I do solemnly promise to trim all quotations appropriately before
replying>

Jack Rosier - 29 Mar 2005 05:06 GMT
First, this is not a personal attack, OK?
1. Listen to the advice that you have solicited, most of these people are
just trying to be helpful.
2. Don't try to compete with the other dozens of review websites. Go your
own direction and make your site really useful.
3. Get both a spell checker and a grammar checker and learn how to use them.
   Also consider: Most community colleges have English grammar courses,
sometimes on eves or weekends.
4. A small, well organized website with carefully researched articles will
be well-received.
5. Consider hosting a forum on your site where folks can share knowledge on
digital-photography techniques.
   You could organize, summarize, and further research the data into useful
articles or FAQ's.
It's not easy being successful. If it was, we'd all be rich &  famous.
Good luck, Jack

> I see alot of post about digital camera review sites but I never see
> anyone point to us?
>
> Digital Camera Reviews - http://www.camera-reviews.net
Kevin K - 29 Mar 2005 05:33 GMT
Thanks for the advice Jack,  I believe your comments regarding my
personal usage of the english language to be almost on a benevolent
level.

The forum thing is not gonna happen for now since I believe it would
then be too easy for me to surpase the competition that way, as well
its cheasy, which wouldn't be indicative of your above forementioned
well founded opinions.  I am right now about to get that spell checker
and grammar checker I so obviously need.

As far as being useful I think my sites doing a great job of laying it
on the line what the camera has, what it doesn't and where to get it.

Can you as well post a site I could have a look at that you have so I
could maybe get a few pointers.  I think I have something to say , and
I say it well.

I will never " Slam my audience with 5000 word pages of over
information "  I think thats the problem in the current industry is
that its all " over information " .  I think the other sites are just
bloated.

In regards to Ads, hey I guys got to pay the bills and I don't see the
other websites Not running them, I am just a tad more obvious.  But you
will find what your looking for when you come to any-one of my websites
and their very relevant.

Thank you for all your advice this is turning out to be very helpful.
Frank  ess - 29 Mar 2005 05:47 GMT
> First, this is not a personal attack, OK?
> 1. Listen to the advice that you have solicited, most of these people
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>>
>> Digital Camera Reviews - http://www.camera-reviews.net

Jack, I think you are underestimating Kevin K. I'll bet he is a graduate
of the finest public (USA usage) school system known to man. He's also
finished a finishing school and is as well-mannered as you could hope
for in today's world. The only thing missing is that Ghod needs to tell
him he should be president, or maybe just a digital camera review site
webmaster.

Any road, I commend you, Jack, on your good-heartedness and patience. If
Kevin K has any sense at all he will take your advice, as well as that
of others who have offered similar, and shape up his site and his self.

For my part, I'll skip his posts until some of the replies indicate a
change for the better.

(My turn in the grumpy seat)

Signature

Frank ess

Confused - 29 Mar 2005 06:52 GMT
Frank wrote:

> ...
> (My turn in the grumpy seat)

Dangnabit!    <VBG>

You stole the tone of my reply if he replies incorrectly...

Jeff  (never grumpy... No, really!)
Big Bill - 29 Mar 2005 05:30 GMT
>I see alot of post about digital camera review sites but I never see
>anyone point to us?
>
>Digital Camera Reviews - http://www.camera-reviews.net

I use Firefox,and when I use ctrl+ to increase text size, ot totally
screws up the site.
You're doing something non-standard in your HTML. It is not
user-friendly, especially for those of us who need larger type.

Did you write those reviews? They look amazingly like ad copy. You
call these "reviews", but I see little to suggest you've handled these
cameras, much less reviewed them.

You also have a serious attitude problem, judging from what I've seen
here.
You came here asking us to look at your site, remember? What did you
expect?

Signature

Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"

Kevin K - 29 Mar 2005 05:42 GMT
I appologize if I am being perceived by you as having a attitude
problem.  I am reallying trying to get some feedback here from my site
see bill I am right now getting thousands of hits on my website and no
one is emailing me regarding it.

Unfortunately this makes it very difficult to tailor a website for
users if they don't tell me what to change.

I am more than happy to change formats to whatever pleases my audience.
I think I will have to ad a FeedBack Form so people can tell me what
they think.

Possibly some more interactivity would be better.  Again thanks for the
info.
Confused - 29 Mar 2005 06:48 GMT
On 28 Mar 2005 20:42:17 -0800
In message <1112071337.853935.324020@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
Posted from http://groups.google.com

Several comments:

There are not too many ads.  There are too many ads that are poorly
placed on pages.  For example, a "review" headline placed off to the
right side of a page with ad text formatted directly underneath the
headline is confusing.

I agree with other's comments on "no substantial information".  The
two reviews I picked were quickly thrown together, and it's obvious
you don't have much (if any) experience with the cameras reviewed.

Your domain name is NOT one I would select for unbiased reviews.  You
might as well have a front door marked "SPAM INSIDE".

    Bargain Finds On eBay.com

> I appologize if I am being perceived by you as
> having a attitude problem.

If others are perceiving an "attitude" problem, I would guess the real
problem is a language barrier.  What is your native language?

> I am reallying trying to get some feedback here from my site
> see bill I am right now getting thousands of hits on my website and no
> one is emailing me regarding it.

"thousands of hits" is usually a highly inflated number.  A few people
can generate a lot of raw client-server requests in a short period of
time, especially when actively seeking advise from a usenet group.

You probably won't get very many " Vote Up " responses for two
reasons:  

 1) You will not get my eMail address to rate a camera.

 2) What's a " Vote Up " ???

> Unfortunately this makes it very difficult to tailor a website for
> users if they don't tell me what to change.

You have asked and been answered here.  Heed the advice.

> I am more than happy to change formats to whatever pleases my audience.

First the audience must be identified, then write for the audience.
AFTER you do that, you may get feedback if you hit your mark.

> I think I will have to ad a FeedBack Form so people can tell me what
> they think.

You've already gotten more feed back here in one day than you would
with a month of FeedBack (it's Feedback, btw).

> Possibly some more interactivity would be better.

That depends... do you want to write video games or reviews?  ;^)

> Again thanks for the info.

"Information R Us" ... heh

Jeff
Kevin K - 29 Mar 2005 08:36 GMT
I appologize again :( ,

I also noticed you misenterpreted my site like quite a few already
hence why I am changing it from http://www.bargainfindsonebay.com to
http://www.camera-reviews.net.  The current domain name is pronounced
Bargain Finds One Bay and not to be confused with the Online Garage
Sale that sells cheap useless merchandise.  I realize that this was a
poor choice in domain names.  I will 301 the domain to the following
domain and make the later root within 60 days to remove confusion since
eBay has already asked google to remove one listing and they did.

As I realize the following domain name is alot more auspicious than the
first so I must create a new site layout that will refect the site "
Flavor " again as not to confuse my readers.  I am trying to provide
the best reviews possible and the most unobtrusive ads as possible.

BTW I changed the ratings page and front page as asked.

I also don't know what my ethnic background maters but I am half
ukranian and half yugoslavian

Basically it means I like to fight with my neighbours and eat lots of
perogies.

I hope to create alot better reviews in the future thanks again for the
helpful advice.
Confused - 29 Mar 2005 09:31 GMT
On 28 Mar 2005 23:36:33 -0800
In message <1112081793.244811.275540@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
Posted from http://groups.google.com

> I also noticed you misenterpreted my site like quite a few already

Have you considered that you might not be communicating your intent as
intended?  No one has misinterpreted your web site.

> hence why I am changing it from http://www.bargainfindsonebay.com to
> http://www.camera-reviews.net.

That would be a mistake at this point in time.  When your site has
product review of note, then a change would be appropriate.  Change it
now and you will be a bottom feeder skimming click-through pennies
from people who know nothing at all about cameras.  Do you know how
much money and time it would take to review all the cameras on sale AT
THIS TIME?

> The current domain name is pronounced
> Bargain Finds One Bay

I don't believe that for one second.  Your english is too good to be
able to sell that one.  Nice try, though.  <G>

> and not to be confused with the Online Garage
> Sale that sells cheap useless merchandise.  I realize that this was a
> poor choice in domain names.  I will 301 the domain to the following
> domain and make the later root within 60 days to remove confusion since
> eBay has already asked google to remove one listing and they did.

??    "eBay has already asked google to
??    remove one listing and they did"

What does that comment have to do with anything?  Google doesn't
listen to anyone except the United States Government.

> As I realize the following domain name is alot more auspicious than the
> first so I must create a new site layout that will refect the site "
> Flavor "

Since you have ignored my specific comments, I'll join 'ol grumpy
after writing this reply.  Take heed to an old saying:

    You can't judge a book by it's cover.

Comments have been made as you requested, correctly observing that you
have no reviews on your web site.  There is an interesting twist to
most "old sayings" that appear in many languages: they have a flip
side.  The flip side to this one is:

    You can't change a book by changing the cover.

> again as not to confuse my readers.  I am trying to provide
> the best reviews possible and the most unobtrusive ads as possible.
> BTW I changed the ratings page and front page as asked.

I didn't ask.  (see next comment)

> I also don't know what my ethnic background maters but I am half
> ukranian and half yugoslavian

Your ethnic background is irrelevant.  You need to expand your
understanding of english before expanding and promoting your web site.

> Basically it means I like to fight with my neighbours and eat lots of
> perogies.
>
> I hope to create alot better reviews in the future thanks again for the
> helpful advice.

Jeff (off to join the old and grumpy :-)
Julian  Tan - 30 Mar 2005 03:32 GMT
Or you could just target an audience that speaks (reads? :D) a language
that you're familiar with, by writing your site in your native tongue.
That might be quite successful - there aren't many multilingual digital
camera sites out there...

Jules
http://www.shuttertalk.com - the friendliest digital photography forums
on the net!

>> I also don't know what my ethnic background maters but I am half
>> ukranian and half yugoslavian

>Your ethnic background is irrelevant.  You need to expand your
>understanding of english before expanding and promoting your web site.
Derek Fountain - 29 Mar 2005 08:22 GMT
> Unfortunately this makes it very difficult to tailor a website for
> users if they don't tell me what to change.

It doesn't work like that. You have to do some work for your money. All the
major browsers are free or have trial versions - download them and test
them.

The W3C's HTML validation service for your site is here:

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bargainfindsonebay.com%2F

And what the heck is that Bargain Finds On Ebay crap? If you expect your
http://www.camera-reviews.net website be taken seriously at least arrange
things so it keeps that name.

> I am more than happy to change formats to whatever pleases my audience.
>  I think I will have to ad a FeedBack Form so people can tell me what
> they think.

Unless you at least make an effort to do a professional job you won't get
any repeat visitors, let alone people who are prepared to put in the time
to help you improve. Decent websites don't just appear from thin air and a
bunch of advert referrals, as you've clearly found out.

Signature

The email address used to post is a spam pit. Contact me at
http://www.derekfountain.org : <a
href="http://www.derekfountain.org/">Derek Fountain</a>

Kevin K - 29 Mar 2005 08:47 GMT
OMG WOW 17 errors thanks Derek I had no Idea my coding was so bad.  I
will try and improve this immediately !  I realize that my website is
no where near what it should be.  I am a amateur so I will never be as
few errors per 1000 lines of code of such large corporations such as
microsoft.

As this site is very new I just started it yesterday on a whimb I knew
I had a long road ahead before I start seeing results.  I

Since my website started last month I have seen only but a few ad cents
and still havent sold a single camera.

I just keep plugging away here as I live in a adobe house in bagdad
right now and airconditioning isn't available.

I realized now when I checked my raw logs that all those thousands were
just googlebot :( I guess I still am never going to see and search
engine traffic.
Steven M. Scharf - 29 Mar 2005 06:54 GMT
> I see alot of post about digital camera review sites but I never see
> anyone point to us?
>
> Digital Camera Reviews - http://www.camera-reviews.net

There are no reviews on your site. You list the camera's features, and have
a link to Amazon so you can get affiliate fees. Nothing wrong with this, but
you shouldn't call it a review site.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.