http://www.rharte.nl/images/fotoindex_main.html
> However impressive subject, the photo seems somewhat 'flat'.
> This is mostly due to the fact that this thing is completely grey and
> was bading in sunshine, which quite flattens the histogram.
I can't see anything you could do to it. It covers all the tonal values.
As you said, the lighting was flat. I think it looks very good.
As you know, different lighting conditions will light it in different
ways. Keep going back. I'd like to see it lit up at night.
Please let us know and name the post oill rig or something similar so
we'll know.
You have a lot of other nice shots there too. You have a good eye.
Thanks for posting
Charlie

Signature
Charlie Dilks
Newark, DE USA
Willy Eckerslyke - 15 Jul 2003 14:32 GMT
> http://www.rharte.nl/images/fotoindex_main.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I can't see anything you could do to it. It covers all the tonal values.
> As you said, the lighting was flat. I think it looks very good.
I pretty much agree. If a different viewpoint was possible, a view from
a hundred or two metres to one side may help by not being so square on.
The problem areas for me are the rather muddy expanses of dark grey of
the legs. I'd be inclined to play around with selecting such areas and
fiddling with the levels to try to break them up a bit.
I don't know how the conversion to greyscale was done, but checking the
three colour channels seperately in Photoshop and then only using, say,
the red channel might open up some possibilities. Then again, perhaps
that's what he already did.
Rene - 15 Jul 2003 14:45 GMT
> > http://www.rharte.nl/images/fotoindex_main.html
> >
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> the red channel might open up some possibilities. Then again, perhaps
> that's what he already did.
That is exactly what i played around with. The funny thing is, and I have
been wanting to post this question: the red channel always seems much
more noisy than the other two channels. Is there a particular reason for
that? Is it just my camera (sony f707), or is it something most CCD's
have? Or am i just crazy? ;-)
As a result, I always put in more green and reduce red, to get a noise-free
B&W-picture. What I didn't try yet is convert to Lab and delete a and b
channel to leave pure luminance... I'll try that!
Tanx for the feedback!
Rene
Rene - 15 Jul 2003 14:39 GMT
> http://www.rharte.nl/images/fotoindex_main.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Please let us know and name the post oill rig or something similar so
> we'll know.
I'm planning on going tonite although it is a stunning 30+ degrees
here; not very inviting for carrying my stuff around ;-)
> You have a lot of other nice shots there too. You have a good eye.
Tanx for the compliment, Charlie! It's well appreciated....
Rene
Nice photograph! Contrast Masking, a little gamma and some
Unsharpening Mask bring it up beautifully. Search this newsgroup with
Google to read more about how to do Contrast Masking.
Peter
>Dear Usenetters,
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
>Rene
Digital Photography Reference
http://members.shaw.ca/jonespm2/PJDigPhot.htm
Touchup, an image viewing applet (also shows EXIF)
http://members.shaw.ca/jonespm2/software.htm
Health, happiness and healing
http://www.SuperNaturalWoman.com
Rene - 15 Jul 2003 16:30 GMT
> Nice photograph! Contrast Masking, a little gamma and some
> Unsharpening Mask bring it up beautifully. Search this newsgroup with
> Google to read more about how to do Contrast Masking.
I will! thanx!
Rene